More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics of totalitarianism
Merits and demerits of totalitarianism
Merits and demerits of totalitarianism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the wake of the second world war, the consensus amongst historians was that the power of Hitler in the third Reich was that of omnipotent and outright, and his control over such was definitive. This has been reason of debate following the emergence of interpretation through revisionist Historians such as Martin Broszat. Broszat argues that Hitler was a weak and indecisive leader dependent upon the actions of his subordinates through which manipulated him by way of their competing and overlapping power structures. This has found its way to the conclusive ‘structuralist’ vs ‘intentionalist’ debate for which historians such as Karl Dietrich Bracher take acceptance to the fact of competition amongst rival power structures however lays greater
This philosophy dictates that everyone in a society are equal and that all aspects of life are controlled by the state (Waugh, 2001). Unlike his counterpart, Hitler practiced Nazism during his tenure as Nazi Germany’s totalitarian (Waugh, 2001). Nazism asserts that everyone has unconditionally pledged their loyalty to the ‘Führer’ and that the Aryan race was superior to all other races (Waugh, 2001). Such contrasting beliefs would eventually play an integral role in discerning both men. Both tyrants were also segregated by their dissimilar
Do you think the World is an inch away from becoming in totalitarianism? Animal farm, by George Orwell, is a novel about razor-edged fairy tale that was written about a farm taken by its intelligent, mistreated Animals who believe their freedom is taken away in a devastated totalitarian society. It also include how the Animals on the farm are set out to create their own progress of justice and equality from the human beings. There are numerous differences between totalitarian society in the book and in America today, but there is multiply similarities too. A similarities of totalitarian in the book is that totalitarian is represented by Propaganda, which Propaganda is used to spread idea’s everyday.
“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the lie passed into history and became truth. ' Who controls the past' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past” (Orwell). Throughout history, and particularly since the authoritarian regimes of the twentieth century, historians have struggled to understand the fundamental factors behind dictators’ ascendancy to power. Why did the fascists and communists do what they did, and how did an otherwise freedom-loving populace allow such tyranny to occur? What contributed to the Nazi Party’s majority in the Reichstag after the July 1932 elections?
Hannah Arendt once said, “There are no dangerous thoughts; thinking itself is dangerous”. This quote really helps to grasp the harsh reality of the world Arendt went through because it captures the essence of the fierce criticism she faced. Arendt was a thinker, but her thinking was different which led her to become the face of huge controversy not only in the local community, but among her own people. Arendt’s major focus in her book Eichmann of Jerusalem revolves around a famous concept of hers, the “banality of evil”. The “banality of evil” lies in Hannah Arendt’s belief that Eichmann was not thinking and was merely following the commands of his superior.
The novel’s use of totalitarian government is relevant in today’s government use of
What Arendt did do was open a massive divide between two versions of a painful past: a monstrosity or a normality. Arendt’s critics wanted Eichmann to be the clearest verdict of evil that history has put on record. Arendt disputed not that he was evil, but rather the nature and consequence of such evil. Arendt casts Eichmann into a theory of evil and a narrative of history which, to many of her counterparts, is not only outrageous but perhaps terrifying.
Throughout history governments have evolved in their laws and ruling tactics. It has also changed the way literature has been portrayed to the readers. This essay is based on Totalitarian government. Totalitarianism is a form of government that whereabouts the fact that the ruler and government is an absolute control over the state. Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Benito Mussolini are some of the dictators that had total control over the people and state.
Hannah Arendt's challenge to Adolf Eichmann | Judith Butler. Retrieved February 04, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/hannah-arendt-adolf-eichmann-banality-of-evil Hartouni, V. (2012). Visualizing atrocity Arendt, evil, and the optics of thoughtlessness. New York: New York University
As a conclusion, Arendt define totalitarianism as a combination of total terror and ideology with the potential of destructive power existing within both Nazi Germany and Stalin’s rule in Soviet Russia. Arendt’s argument was criticized massively since it draws similarities between a communist regime and national socialism which have completely different economic base and the structure of the party system (Kershaw, 2004 : 239). Moreover, there are differences between Nazism and Stalinism in terms of the role of the leader (Sauer, 1967 : 419). While fascist regimes are identical with their leaders, Bolshevism is relatively less dependent on the leaders in order to survive and maintain the social and political order. (Sauer, 1967 : 419).
I. The origin of totalitarianism. A. Stalin 's regime had been giving the both instances of a novel form of government a name called totalitarianism. B. Hannah Arendt knows as political theorist from Germany like Some people think that the opposing Stalin 's regime was political.
Political theorists such as Hannah Arendt have noted that the members of a totalitarian state “can be reached by neither experience nor argument; identification with the movement and total conformism seem to have destroyed the very capacity for experience.” At this point, you may think that our current western liberal democracy is too strong to fall under the influence of someone like Hitler. But is that the case, and is the process currently underway? Arendt argues that the successes of totalitarian movements hinges dismissal of two illusions commonly believed and are in the hearts of current democratic states.
History is defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary as “a chronological record of significant events; events of the past” (Merriam-Webster). That’s generally what people think of when they hear the word “history”, but not everyone was/is satisfied with that term for the definition. Hannah Arendt, the writer of “The Concept of History”, stated that “These single instances, deeds or events, interrupt the circular movement of daily life… The subject matter of history is these interruptions – the extraordinary” (Arendt). By defining history as such, Arendt gives off the impression that history is for the greats or for those who were lucky enough to go on a life adventure.
In this paper, the paradox of human rights will be discussed from a Arendtian perspective, and it will be argued that a solution to this paradox can be found only and foremost with deconstructing what a human and politics mean, following Agamben’s perspective on “bare life” and “biopolitics.” A)Post WWI “Imperialism,” the second part of The Origins of Totalitarianism entails Hannah Arent’s critical discussion on human rights. “The Decline of the Nation-State and the End of the Rights of Man” is the final chapter of “Imperialism” where Arendt mainly discusses how the failure of human rights is the fundamental fact of modern times.
Research Proposal for Master of Philosophy in Humanities Thesis Title: Historical Dimension of Action: Political Experience in Hannah Arendt’s Thought Name of Applicant: Sigmund Tung-tin WONG Application No.: 61600000141 Research Interest: History of Political Thought This page is left blank intentionally.
