The book explains more about slavery. The movie makes slavery appear very easygoing and mild. When the book makes it appear very real and how slavery actually was. In the book it talks about pit schools and the movie doesn't even discuss them.
There are many simularities and differences in the book and movie " The
In the end I found the film to be easier to understand vs the book as it was an easier and more straight forward plot line whereas in the book it seemed to jump around leading to constant flipping between stories and pages to get a better
Hatchet does a better job explaining because it is in order and the movie is not in order. For example, in the movie Brian finds the cave in the middle of the movie and in the book he finds the cave in the beginning of the book. Also, what I liked about the book is it makes sense. In Hatchet it has less special effects and in the movie it has a lot of special effects. In the movie it has a lot of violent parts in it but in the book it only has like one violent effect.
A book and a movie are similar and different in many ways, for instance, a movie is a visual representation including audio, while a book leaves you with reading and imagination. In most cases your imagination prevails the limited visuals a movie offers but, I believe that the movie tells this survival story better. In this case we are comparing Hatchet (the book) and A Cry In The Wild (the movie) , and frankly, the movie’s visuals depicted a lot of things better.
The literary techniques that are used in “Hatchet” are parallelism, personification, and anomotopea. Gary Polsen uses parallelism to describe an emotion the character is feeling by repeating one word over and over again. One example of parallelism is in section three of chapter 13, which states “Turn, smell, listen, feel, and then a sound, a small sound”. The second example is in section 15 in chapter 17, which says “He took out the wing and tail feathers, which were stiff and long and pretty-banded speckled in browns and grays and light reds.” The third and final example of parallelism is in chapter 19, which says “Out one at a time to examine them, turn the in the light, touch them and feel them with his hands and eyes”.
If people give up all the time individuals will never get far in life or become successful, but if people try their best until people get better or at least try, people are less likely to fail. To begin, in the realistic fiction novel, Hatchet by Gary Paulsen, there is a kid named Brian Robeson whose parents are divorced. So he gets on a plane to go see his dad, but usually stays mainly with his mom. When he goes on the plane for the first time since the divorce his plane crashes in the middle of a forest. Brian has to learn how to survive in the wilderness and hope he gets saved.
I enjoyed the movie better than the book. It included just the right amount of action scenes, description words, and details from the story. The story was amazing but I like seeing things more than reading them. I usually like the movies better than the book.
Another example is when Alby got stung and Minho and Alby couldn't make it back to the glade in time so Thomas ran into the maze to help them. “He grabbed one of the vines and wrapped it around
The movie The cry in the wild does a better job telling the story than the book. I believe this cause the movie gives more details than the book. Also, in the movie gives more foreshadowing than the book. For example,in the book Brain’s had when to sleep and dream about the time when him and his dad were camping. The next day, Brain got up and when hunting for fish.
This is why the book is always better than the movie. The IMAGINATION
Firstly, in my opinion I think it has more details than the movie. The book has the same characters but in the book there is three sisters. The book had details that felt so real. It described everything, the setting and the mood.
In my opinion there are a lot of comparisons between the film and the book, but there are also differences between them too, but also they have impacted the audience in both the film and the
For example, the first allusion Paul uses takes him and his team “down the rabbit hole” to avoid a crisis in his dream. Paul’s fantasy developes a big problem when he imagines the squad meeting a young woman, Sarkin Aung Wan, and the lieutenant says she is not permitted to accompany them. Unknown to the reader, Sarkin will later act as the alter ego of Paul when it comes time to make his decision so it is crucial that she accompanies the team. Paul realizes that he needs to find a way out of a difficult situation and imagines an earthquake, and suddenly “[t]he road was gone and they were simply falling, all of them…. everything, tumbling down a hole in the road to Paris” (O’Brien 76).
Books vs. Movies The constant battle between watching a movie and reading a book has lead to many disagreements. Many valid arguments can be made in favor of each as well as each having it’s own disadvantages, yet the question still remains unanswered. Books and movies have many similarities and differences when it comes to experience, development, and imagery. To begin, there are a variety of reasons that make movies not as good as books. The experience, the depth, and the imagery are the three main aspects one needs in order to understand why movies are not as good as books.
