Hedda Gabler Essay

Bjorklund’s 2016 journal article for the Scandinavian Studies electronically published in Questia School explicitly explored the aspect with regard to Female Masculinity demonstrated in Hedda Gabler, the 1890s drama play written by Norwegian playwright Henrik Ibsen. The article therefore focused on one symbol, namely General Gabler’s pistol inherited by Hedda Gabler in introducing Halberstam’s theory of the female masculinity. In brief terms, the theory suggested that one experienced signs of ‘misidentification and maladjustment’ (Bjorklund) which is further expressed through the desire of possessing power beyond what is capable and allowed. That Bjorklund found the character of Hedda Gabler in being an example of female masculinity in the late 19th century, which is strong supported by her possession and playing of the father’s pistols. Simply as

Hedda rejects femininity more than she embrace masculinity. Throughout the play, Thea and Aunt Julia had done played the role as foils for Hedda. In which both women especially represented the traditional late-19th century femininity which Hedda refused to convert That their difference in appearance showed the contrast. For example, Thea’s hair is ‘abundant and way’ suggesting femininity while Hedda’s hair is ‘not particularly abundant’ suggesting a lack of femininity; thus Thea’s large blue eyes and questioning look suggesting her submission nature while Hedda’ steel tray gaze suggesting a sense of strength over others. However, the article suggested that Hedda embraces masculinity demonstrated by her will in controlling one’s destiny. That this can be seen through the name ‘Gabler’ emphasising the identification to her father, General Gabler, the symbol of power and