INTRODUCTION In this essay I am going to provide a brief but detailed account of Hegel, Fichte, Rousseau and Helevictus. Lastly, discuss the similarities or differences between this theorists. However, All those theorists have been exploring how as human being exist, how we attain freedom as individuals in our society, but those theorists have not succeeded to give proper understanding. We as human being still looking for certainty whether we free or not, it’s of course a close concern to everybody. Firstly Helevictus believe that there is one system, morality and freedom. He argues that there is one system and one rule. He said the man “seek pleasure and avoid pain”, that is how we are. We are selfish being. Man is not good but we can merely be changed by society that we live in. If the man get what he wants he will be much contented and honest, we all do things that makes us happy and be virtious. We find pleasure from government and laws, you just follow the rules of government because if you break the law you will be unhappy …show more content…
Hegel says we in the Geinst and it’s like a movement that we are uncertain about. You don’t have the power to change things in it, which means you can never be fully free. We are not sure when the process is going to end. There is completely no freedom. I think there shall always be privileged individual like heroes look in our world as leaders people who would have used Hegel’s system of dialectic to make changes in our society. But even them are imprisoned in to this system of Hegel since they always intend to make changes and mend their synthesis. We are rational human beings and we reason, we always think and want to make changes in our lives and get certified. But apparently we are stuck through our thought so we can never be