Puritans have shown that more often than not, they have the same philosophy regarding their religious views and moral values, but often tend to express them in different ways. Anne Bradstreet wrote a poem, “Here Follow Some Verses upon the Burning of our House, July 10, 1666.” Her poem was about a personal experience where, although she had lost everything, including her home, she came to the realization that everything she had, came from God, all she had to do was to leave her troubles and worries in his hands. Jonathan Edwards wrote a sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”. In this sermon, Jonathan voices his belief in a strongly way stating how people should conform to his idea of a Puritan lifestyle, otherwise the consequences of not being one would be Hell. Although both authors are trying to portray the same idea, they have very different ways of expressing …show more content…
Edwards uses a harsh tone for readers to face the reality of what the consequences would be for not following the life a Puritan should be living. An example of this reality from his sermon, “ there is hell’s wide gaping mouth.”(Edwards, 80) God has all the power of choosing what he wants to do with you and saying it’s as if he’s holding you above Hell getting ready to drop you without hesitation. Bradstreet uses a calmer tone in her poem, “Yet by His gift is made thine own; there’s wealth enough, I need no more.”(Bradstreet, 70) Even when her house and her belongings are burned to ashes, she believes by the glory of God, it’s okay since everything was from him anyways.
Bradstreet and Edwards, although both have very different ways of expressing their idea of the lifestyle of a Puritan, they portray the same idea. Edwards goes straight to the point and explains the harsh reality of being a Puritan or not. Where Bradstreet is calm and humble in a situation that most people would blame God and go against him, she will continue to glorify