Journal Entry: The Presidential Debate #1 The first presidential debate was almost childish. The way that both Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump attacked each other in a desperate attempt for votes was pathetic. There was no winner/loser in this debate, the fact that the allegations against trump were ignorant and most likely untrue, was a clear indicator how the rest of the debate was gonna go. Also how Hillary Clinton had that smile and arrogant attitude made the interpretation that it was a game of playground insults, and they both were children fighting. Now there was some good point that came up in the debate, such as Trumps, and Clinton's foreign relations policy. There really was no clear winner or loser as mentioned. Though if there was It would have to be Clinton by the slightest. The reason for this was the fact she actually kept in the guidelines for the debate. Clinton also kept her cool and didn't really raise her voice in anger. …show more content…
The reason is he seems to be a decent guy, who wants to create jobs for the people, and especially the veterans. Trump also wants to keep a focus on the war in the Middle East and the war with ISIS which is a major concern. ISIS is doing terrible, and unthinkable things that the majority of the U.S have no clue about. A lot of people say “Ignorance is bliss” This is not the case for someone who wants to help other. Trump wants to defeat and ruin ISIS. This would be a noble cause. It would not only stop a lot of horrors it could also stabilize some parts of the middle east. Neither of the two candidates are the greatest but they both have their flaws and strong suits. PS: My guess on who you would vote for is (#1) Jill Stein, or (#2) Hillary Clinton. Jill because of the fact you want to help preserve and you respect the environment, and Hillary because you believe strongly in women's rights and equality.