Hills Like White Elephants Essay

496 Words2 Pages

“Hills like White Elephants” is a one of a kind short story written by Ernst Hemingway. In this story, he decides to use the third person objective point of view, which makes the plot both thought-provoking and confusing. One might ask, does the third person objective point of view make the story more interesting? First, in “Hills like White Elephants” Hemingway makes use of a third person limited narrator. Therefore, the narration is only limited to what the characters say and do. By not showing the character’s motives, mind-set and attitudes, Hemingway’s allows the reader to interpret this for themselves. The whole story is told as if you, the reader, is present at the scene and overhearing the couple’s conversation. Much of the story is told through the dialogue between Jig and The American, within the dialogue the couple discusses whether to have the operation or not: “"It's really an awfully simple operation, Jig," the man said. "It's not really an operation at all."” In the conversation Hemingway never mentions the topic, but assumes that the reader will make accurate assumptions. Though we as onlookers understand what Jig and The American are discussing, we have no idea what their thoughts and feelings are. In this short story, Hemingway primarily make use of internal and without focalization, because the audience does not get in to the …show more content…

For example, at some point doing the couple’s conversation the American tries to convince Jig to have an abortion “We can have the whole world. (…) We can go anywhere.” The American dialogue makes the reader know that having the abortion will allow the couple to be free from responsibility. At one point, Jig says “No we can’t. It isn’t ours any more… And once they take it away, you never get it back.” This shows that Jig believes having the whole world means settling