ipl-logo

Hippocratic Argument Against Euthanasia

1071 Words5 Pages

Peter Singer once said, “Of all the arguments against voluntary euthanasia, the most influential is the slippery slope: once we allow doctors to kill patients, we will not be able to limit the killing to those who want to die.” Euthanasia is the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (such as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy (ProCon.org). In other words, it is a drug that is given to patients who have decided to take their own life to no longer be in suffering. Euthanasia should not be used because it devalues the human life, it contradicts the Hippocratic oath that is still used today, and euthanasia could be used to control health care costs. …show more content…

The human life is a precious thing we had been granted. To just take it away it is almost like you are not acknowledging that the human life is a gift that no money is able to buy. Instead of following the patient's way we should try to find ways that will help the patients life and show the patients that their life does indeed have value. For example, there are many ways that a patient's pain is controllable, and in cases of depression, therapy can sometimes be the best option. “Modern medicine has the ability to control pain. Killing oneself is not a way to end intense pain; a doctor better trained in palliative care is the solution.” (TEXAS RIGHT TO LIFE, 2010). In other words, instead of finding the easy way out of a pain that a patient is receiving, we as a community can be able to find solutions that will benefit the patient in the long run. In a majority of the cases, patients that ask for euthanasia suffer from depression without even knowing it. With these patients, we need to treat them like any other patient that has depression and make sure that they get the best mental

Open Document