Hippocratic Oath Benefits

For three years, you 've struggled fighting a losing battle with malignant lymphoma, a cancer that infested your bones. You now sit trembling on the bathroom floor with sweat beading down your face. Moaning, your legs curl up against you in a fetal position as you rock back and forth whimpering in soft, broken gasps. The doctor gave you a prescription for a lethal drug, and a single swallow would end your existence. But is there really a choice? How could you go on living with the knowledge that you 're only a problem? You’re dying anyway, and every struggled breath is money taken from your family to pay for your helpless, useless self. A waste of money. A strangled wale rips out of your throat as a part of you clings to life. Your family

However, how can that possibly be true? One of the earliest forms of the Hippocratic Oath states: “I will use those dietary regimens which will benefit my patients according to my greatest ability and judgement, and I will do no harm or injustice to them,” (Bodemer). Since Ancient Greece, the Hippocratic Oath has been an ethical code that guides physicians. In it, it specifies the physician 's duties to his patient, and his obligation to transmit medical knowledge. Not surprisingly, Euthanasia is going against every single section of this oath. To begin, a dietary regimen is meant to restore health. Denying or purposely not giving them food to “end their suffering” could never more strongly go against this. Secondly, it says that they will do no harm or injustice to them. There is no justice in killing and it only creates harm. Can an injustice or harm be solved by another injustice? It works the same way a lie can cover up another lie. Finally, lethal injections are one of the greatest means to follow through with euthanasia. It can be in the form of a drug overdose, and some people are even offered it. This again goes against the Hippocratic Oath. People also say that the constitution gives a right to die. “Under the due process clause, a U.S. citizen cannot lose his life, liberty, or property without notice and the opportunity to be heard, ” ("Arguments Against Euthanasia."). Moreover, a right is a moral claim. We do not have a claim on death, rather, death has a claim on us. Finally, the Bible. Some could argue that it should not be brought into the topic of euthanasia. It’s too biased and we should have a freedom of religion, and thus, it should not cloud our vision. However, what if religion is the basis of our reasoning? “84% of the world has faith, and one-third of the world is Christian,” (Harper). This covers a vast