ipl-logo

How Can Peace Lead To War

947 Words4 Pages

Can peace lead to war Peace what does it mean? Some people say it means a war is over. But during World War 1 peace meant a different meaning. Some people ask what did president Woodrow mean by peace without victory? What is the treaty of Versailles? What did Germany lose by signing the treaty of Versailles? These are all questions that will be answered throughout this paper. I believe that peace doesn 't have to lead to war. What did president Woodrow mean when he said peace without victory? Some people believe that his meaning of peace without a victory was there can be no peace with war. He is saying that as long as there is war then there can be no peace. What he is saying is that if there is a victory in a war that means there is also a loser. With a winner and a loser then only one of the countries will have peace. Even with the winner having peace then they still have lost a lot of people in the war so there really is no winner in war. What president Woodrow meant by peace without war was if there is no winner or loser then we will all agree and all have peace. President Woodrow said, “Victory …show more content…

What is the treaty of Versailles? The treaty of Versailles was supposed to be a solution for war. It was supposed to make all countries at war sign this and solve their differences. It was supposed to make all the countries repay all their debt and make everyone have peace. But some countries did not agree to all of the proposals on the treaty. Germany one of the main reasons for the treaty did not like that they were blamed for World War 1 and that they had to pay for all of the cost. At first, Germany didn 't want to pay for all of there cost. Some people might say people could claim that Germany was able to pay off their debts but chose not to. This may have been true but if they chose to it would sacrifice a lot for Germany their economy would crash and their people would starve so Germany could but in the proses they would also ruin Germany 's country as a

Show More
Related
901 Words | 4 Pages

Since the beginning of time, war has been practiced for numerous reasons ultimately to benefit a group of people or nations. But, when war divides the world into two different sides with the capability to destroy faster than we can create, it makes us question, is war really worth it? With the aftermath of World War One, people we’re still divided, but for a different reason, after a war with a catastrophic amount of deaths we had militarists advocating to fight and pacifists demanding peace. The two sources I have used from this essay comes from a European militarist, Friedrich Von Bernhardi with his book “War a Biological Necessity” and United States pacifists, William James, in his book “Moral Equivalent of War”. Therefore this essay will review the

Read More
1511 Words | 7 Pages

Just before the conclusion of the devastating World War I, which had taken more lives than any other war in history, President Woodrow Wilson and the delegates of the Senate in 1919 had conglomerated to come to a decision as to the ratification of the Treaty of Versailles, which had primarily been proposed to set forth conditions which would ultimately put an end to the war. Specifically, according to Wilson’s propositions at the Covenant, the Treaty would make peace with the United States’ adversaries by …; however, its major caveat was that it would divert all blame and responsibility for the war to Germany. This clause would cause several disputes between Wilson and his fellow Senators, which had eventually led to the vetoing of the Treaty

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

Peace talks after peace talks and nothing seemed to fix the needs of the coalitions that were fighting. It was not till the constant threatening and ultimately acting of Unrestricted U-boat Warfare of the Germans that thrusted the Americans into war. One of the best quotes in the entire book that the authors using was from the declaration of war by President Wilson, after he declared war and stated that the reason that the United States was going to war to make the “world be must be made safe for democracy”. After the Congress applauded Wilson’s message, he stated to his secretary, “My message today was a message of death for our young men. How strange it seems to applaud that.”

Read More
1297 Words | 6 Pages

The brutality of war has scarred and devastated the world since the beginning of time, and has drastically changed over the course of history. Many precious lives of loved ones have been lost to war and continue to as fighting rages on. Famous Revolutionary War hero, George Washington, stated “My first wish [as president] is to see this plague of mankind, war, banished from the earth” (George Washington Quotes). General Washington witnessed the terror of war while fighting for independence from Great Britain. Against his wishes, war and violence continued as history went on.

Read More
133 Words | 1 Pages

Overall after reading Elie Wiesel’s speech you will clearly see that having peace is crucial part of success.

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

Finally, Germany wasn 't going to give up. They wanted to win this thing. President Wilson said "Victory would mean peace forced upon the loser. " Meaning, if the Allies won the war, then Germany would have to face the consequences, which would end the war (deaths,

Read More
1424 Words | 6 Pages

The thought of having peace is almost always thought of as a good thing. Sometimes, however, peace is not always such a good thing and can lead to even worse situations than before. One reason why peace isn’t always good and can lead to war is because of punishments put onto other countries for their previous actions. Another reason why peace can lead to war is because alliances will always be thought of in peace treaties. The last reason why peace can lead to war is because some governments don’t really get much of a say in peace talks.

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

The treaty they wrote was ruined. But eventually France and Britain got what they wanted, which was a peace treaty that demanded Germany for peace and them not to rise up another war. The United States was not even on that peace treaty, but history says that Woodrow got his powerful nation, just not the one he wanted. This peace treaty that demanded Germany to obey, gave loss to some of their land. So secretly Germany said that they would do anything they can to get what they had back and then some.

Read More
1378 Words | 6 Pages

Can Peace Lead to War? Yes, peace can lead to war. A temporary peace, or one built up quickly can cause tensions for the oppressed and the oppressors. As in the Treaty of Versailles, Germany was reprimanded for things they did not do and France, Britain and the U.S were fighting with each other over the terms Germany was to agree to.

Read More
83 Words | 1 Pages

“Under this lies a fact never mentioned aloud, but tacitly understood and acted upon: namely, that the conditions of life in all three superstates are very much the same” (P196). This quote means that the purpose of war is to create equality among the three superstates. It implies that the contradicting Party slogan, War is Peace, is actually true. I know this because in Goldstein’s book, he describes how the three superstates all have similar philosophy views such as Ingsoc, Neo-Bolshevism, and Death-worship.

Read More
1201 Words | 5 Pages

The Treaty of Versailles was a peace treaty signed on the 28th of June 1919, by the Allied Powers or the “Big Three”, Britain, France and the USA. It’s main objective was to keep peace between nations, however put strict obligations on Germany to prevent them from rebuilding. The “War Clause”, known as Article 231

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

On June 28, 1919 the Treaty of Versailles was signed, bringing an end to the carnage of World War I. However this peace treaty inadvertently allowed the Central Powers (the countries who lost the war) to harbor ill feelings towards the victors. Because of this, many connect the cause of the second world war to the Treaty of Versailles and in turn say that peace had lead to war. That is a lie. Peace does not lead to wars, but the imprudent and fearful actions of those able to manipulate peace treaties do.

Read More
1804 Words | 8 Pages

It is in the struggle to ensure peace following the tragic events of WWI – a war that was that previously demolished millions of lives and caused hatred that lasted for generations – that the Treaty of Versailles could be seen as a beacon of light in this struggle of peace. Agreed upon by the WWI superpowers of Britain, France and the United States, the purpose of the treaty was to end World War I in such a way that the victorious Entente powers would be satisfied and would result in the unification of Europe. However, it is in this pursuit of harmony that the Treaty of Versailles - intended to be a peace agreement between the Allies and Germany – ended up causing inevitable instability due to its flawed and abusive content – deliberately paralysing

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

“We all say not war, we are all for justice and peace. But sometimes in order to maintain peace, armed action is necessary. But we hope it won’t be the case"-by Silvio Bersuconi. This quote was said by former Italian Prime Minister who spoke about war.

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction World War I came to an end with the signing of the Treaty of Versailles on June 28, 1919. The treaty was signed to create lasting peace. The treaty was negotiated between the three allied powers of Britain, France and the United States with no participation from Germany. The treaty 's negotiations revealed a split between the three allied powers with France intending to weaken Germany in such a manner that it would make it impossible for it to renew hostilities. However, Britain and the United States objected to some of the provisions because of the fear that it would be a pretext for another war.

Read More

More about How Can Peace Lead To War

Related Topics

Open Document