ipl-logo

How Did Alexander Fleming Stay In The Balloon

487 Words2 Pages

The presentation of Alexander Flemings strengths and why he should stay in the balloon was full of arguments and information about his life. He had a strong introducing sentence which caught the attention of an audience and made him seem instantly like the most important person in the balloon. This did not last long though, as straight away after the introduction he mentioned his accidental discovery and his contribution to other peoples work and not much of his own. `There was only a slight explanation of the actual actions Fleming took to develop his find into a biological proof and into a working medicine for the ill. A main issue with the speech he made was that he did not explain what he did, only what he helped towards, which does not provide sufficient reason for him to stay in the theoretical balloon. This is because he has little influence or knowledge which could be applied to the future of human …show more content…

The main body of the speech however was slightly uncomfortable to watch as he read a lot from paper and was not completely comfortable with speaking the words which he had written. There could have been significantly more interaction such as a PowerPoint presentation to add a visual aspect and movement to stop the stationary presentation from becoming dull. Fleming could have ended with a stronger point and less of a repeat of his argument which made it difficult to feel like it was finished. There could have been significantly more audience participation which would have strengthened his argument by catering to the needs of the audience and the gaps in their new knowledge. Having examples of work, he had done could have made the information more accessible to people who are not familiar with scientific

Show More
Related
618 Words | 3 Pages

This was evident through the feedback that he received from the audience, and how smoothly the speech seemed to flow. Along with his speaking sytle, Mike used a variety of supports as well including: narratives, statistics, explanations, and testimonies. He switched between these types of supports throughout the speech, and used each of them very effectively. On the other hand, there was one weakness towards the end of the speech, when it appeared that he tried to call his audience to action by telling them to get back to work. If this was the case, it appeared more humorous than serious, and did not help to conclude his

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

Many people already see scientists as intelligent, but it is not as common to hear that scientists have “passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage.” Popular culture may promote scientists as automaton-like and lacking sentiment, or perhaps as the classic mad scientist, but Barry’s description of scientists shows that they are indeed real people whose work requires a great determination and confidence and extends beyond the realm of pure intellectualism. Using simple, but positive language allows Barry to create empathy in the reader for the scientist, but perhaps more importantly, to convey his message to a broad

Read More
1507 Words | 7 Pages

However since he is doing the opposite, he is misusing his religious status that grants him many opportunities, such as this task, that he uses for his own personal gain instead of for bettering of everyone

Read More
511 Words | 3 Pages

If the audience believes he doesn’t enjoy it, then they won’t bother to listen. Lastly, Jack needs to add a bit more voice variety in the speech. Throughout the speech, it was the same tone and I feel like it could make the speech more interesting with a different voice variety. With these improvements, he will be able to improve on his public speaking for next

Read More
757 Words | 4 Pages

I do believe my speech went horribly, but there were some positive attributes. I think that my topic connected with the audience well because it something everyone could relay to. Also, I will be more cautious in the future when editing my speech and make sure that I do not edit out important information I think that I overall had a good speech. Overall, my speech was not as fluent or organized as I prepared or expected it to be but I think that I had a vital learning

Read More
970 Words | 4 Pages

He glanced down at his papers, but made good eye contact and talked directly to the people when he looked up. His tone changed with the importance of the words and phrases he was saying and the points he was trying to make. He also used well placed pauses that emphasize and add importance to what he is saying. He made hand gestures which are mostly hidden by the podium until the end of his

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

There are many great speeches in the world and they all have their different styles that get the crowd to react how they want. There are also a lot of bad orators and speeches but both of these are polemical. They were both great orators that knew how to control the crowd to getting what they wanted but they also had their differences in the use of their rhetorical appeal.they used so many similar rhetorical devices but their motivations and use of repetition was different. Robert F. Kennedy and Antony’s speeches both had very different motivations. In RFk's speech he goes out on the back of a truck and tries to calm down the crowd after just finding out that MLK had been murdered.

Read More
441 Words | 2 Pages

Novelist, John Taylor Gatto, in his speech essay, “Why Schools Don’t Education”, conveys schools aren’t as educational as they should be. John’s purpose is to narrate the idea that teachers and school district aren’t putting enough effort to educate children and to also motivate more teachers to help bust up children’s education. He adopts a passionate tone in order to appeal in his that education should be taken serious. In order, to convey his appeal of the subject he uses rhetorical analysis to help drill in the audience.

Read More
1261 Words | 6 Pages

His speaking skills, eye contact, and posture make the audience confident in his ability to improve their lives, making up for the lack of logic, and adding to his ethical and emotional appeal. The audience was so entranced with his speaking abilities and caught up in his message, they missed how the information seemed to jump around. The transitions between main points were seamless, so when only listening the first time it is not noticeable. It is the topics that are not put in a logical order and overall make him seem like he is not a credible

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

Within Holder’s speech there were instances of multiple fallacies. One specific fallacy is the generalizations Holder makes in his speech, much like the ones that were used for deductive reasoning. These generalizations were often subjective and not backed up with evidence, which leads to hasty generalizations. Holder states that those who are against animal testing are mainly youth, which infers that all youth are against animal testing. However, it is not just youth who are against animal testing and not all youth are not against animal testing.

Read More
415 Words | 2 Pages

Although Franklin makes a point to say this experiment is about him, he also writes that “it may be well my posterity should be informed…” (Franklin 433). Franklin is writing this with the intent of others seeing his argument. He makes a clear point that this is the direction a perfect man should be heading towards.

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

Considering that he speaks to large groups of students every day, he managed to keep his voice animated, and even though he stumbled over his words a little, he overall was very composed and kept the audience engaged. For the most part his physical delivery was minuscule because he was behind a podium. But he would use hand gestures at certain points to further express his point. The overall impression I conveyed from David McCullough is confidence, and because of title, as well as his confidence, he seemed very credible. And because of his confidence and credibility, the audience was very engaged and responsive.

Read More
1458 Words | 6 Pages

It is often meaningless to evaluate a speech without first considering its context and purposes. As Dr. Blizer pointed out, “a work of rhetoric is pragmatic; it comes into existence for the sake of something beyond itself; it functions ultimately to produce action or change in the world”.1 Jobs’ speech was no exception – its basic function as a commencement speech was ceremonial by nature. Compared to other ceremonial speeches such as a testimonial or an inaugural address, a commencement speech is less restricted in terms of topic. It is, however, bound by the occasion and

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

Did they have a PREVIEW? Do they use any CITATIONS? What were the MAIN POINTS in the speech? HOW was the speaker’s CONCLUSION EFFECTIVE or not?

Read More
983 Words | 4 Pages

Rhetorical Essay Analysis World War II is a time of great struggle for humanity, especially for those within the midst of the battlegrounds. During the June of 1940 in an attempt to boost his citizen’s morale and confidence, Winston Churchill, then Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (UK), gave his speech “We shall fight on the beaches” at the British House of Commons. The rhetorical purpose of this speech is to convince the people of the UK that they have a fighting chance against the Axis forces, even if the worst comes to show. In order to gain people’s support, Churchill employed the rhetorical strategies of historical evidence and emotional appeal.

Read More

More about How Did Alexander Fleming Stay In The Balloon

Related Topics

Open Document