ipl-logo

How Did Faulty Foreign Policy Lead To Jimmy Carter Downfall

2363 Words10 Pages

Did faulty foreign policy lead to Jimmy Carter’s downfall?
When Jimmy Carter preceded Gerald Ford in 1977, he became the 39th President of the United States of America. He won the 1976 election by securing 297 Electoral College votes from 24 States over Ford who narrowly missed out by gaining 240 Electoral College votes from 27 States. However in the 1980 election Carter lost his position as President to Ronald Reagan who secured 489 Electoral College votes against Carter’s 49 votes. Comparing both election results it was clear the Carter’s popularity declined over the 4 years, explaining why he was joint bottom; with Truman, in a public approval vote, scoring 45% (figure 1)[footnoteRef:1]. Also in the final Gallup Poll assessment of Carter’s …show more content…

Unable to articulate a clear vision for the country and beset by the oil and Iranian hostage crisis, Carter proved ill-suited to assume the strong leadership role taken by many of his predecessors. His political weaknesses, however did not translate into a willingness to allow control over the execution of the law to be transferred from the White House to Capitol Hill. On the contrary, in spite of its other problems, the Carter administration appears for the most part to have solidly defended the unitariness of the executive branch.[footnoteRef:4] Throughout this essay I aim to provide a balanced argument that provides an analysis of a number of points that could explain Carter’s downfall, primarily focusing on his response to foreign policy. Hopefully I will produce a conclusive decision which answers the questions at hand, did faulty foreign policy lead to Jimmy Carter’s downfall? [1: …show more content…

Jimmy Carter and his advisers believed that many of the traditional rationales that had guided U.S. foreign policy for over a generation were now outmoded and inappropriate to altered world realities.[footnoteRef:10] His most famous mistake and something that is remembered in his legacy was how he handled the Iranian hostage crisis (4th November 1979 to 20th January 1981. It was this crisis that many considered to be the final nail on Carter’s coffin. The crisis initially started due to a Western and Iranian dispute over oil. When Iran elected their new Prime Minister; Muhammad Mossadegh, in 1951, he nationalised the countries oil trade which would alter British and American control over Iran’s investment. This resulted in an operation known as Operation TP-Ajax to be launched by the CIA and British Intelligence Services which aimed to restore Iran politically and overthrow Mossadegh. It was successful and in the summer of 1958 Iran’s political system was re-established, placing the monarchy; Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi back into total power. With help from the Shavok, communists and social democrats were being arrested and overall ruling with a heavy hand. Shah’s government bought a lot of American resources which reduced the country’s GDP hugely, especially between 1976-1978 as shown in figure 4[footnoteRef:11]. As a

Show More
Related
528 Words | 3 Pages

Jimmy Carter, a former US president effectively incorporates logos – facts and evidence, pathos – appealing word choice and emotion, and ethos – credibility to build his persuasive argument. Carter strives to contend that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry. First, throughout the article, there are many situations where Jimmy Carter incorporates facts and examples. For example, he states, “The Arctic Refuge might provide 1 to 2 percent of the oil our country consumes each day.” By using such numbers, Carter forces the reader to evaluate the situation by recognizing the difference between an insignificant financial income and enormous damage to the territory.

Read More
1136 Words | 5 Pages

Taken Hostage tells the story of the Iran hostage crisis lasting from November of 1979 to the day Reagan’s inauguration. During this period of time, sixty six Americans were held in captivity by Students Following the Line of Imam after the United States allowed the Shah to undergo medical treatment amidst the Iranian revolution. Americans, after a tough decade of inflation, gas shortages, lack of trust in the government, and the defeat in Vietnam were yet again brought into a situation in which required their complete faith that the Carter administration would save the captives. The hostage crisis was a complete shock to the American people in addition to the heightened tensions because of economic decline, government mistrust, and energy

Read More
170 Words | 1 Pages

“As a matter of fact, I visited Poland, Yugoslavia and Romania, to make certain,” continued Ford. Jimmy Carter came out with the win that year.’’ (Cramer, 2016) So the debate between Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford really helped open the eyes of the audience to know who they should vote for as their next

Read More
1211 Words | 5 Pages

At his introduction in January 1977, President Jimmy Carter started his discourse by expressing gratitude toward active president Gerald Ford for all he had done to "recuperate" the scars departed by Watergate. American appreciation had not been sufficiently awesome to return Ford to the Oval Office, yet eagerness for the new president was very little more noteworthy in the new environment of thwarted expectation with political pioneers. Without a doubt, Carter won his gathering's assignment and the administration to a great extent in light of the fact that the Democratic authority had been pulverized by death and the corrupt of Vietnam, and he had precisely situated himself as a pariah who couldn't be rebuked for current arrangements. Eventually, Carter's administration demonstrated a dreary one that was set

Read More
1558 Words | 7 Pages

Bush but considered to be of the active-positive presidential personality type. In Chapter 13, he predicts what President Carter might be like, what happened during his presidential career, his character relating to the position, and the outcome of his term. Barber compiled this chapter’s beginnings before President Carter was sworn in and the endings once he left the Office (Barber, 2008). I appreciated that aspect, especially since feelings can shift as time goes on. Barber does reflect on his feelings and hopes of President Carter pre-term and details what he correctly or incorrectly predicted.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Rhetorical Analysis: A Crisis of Confidence by Jimmy E. Carter From his speech in the Oval Office, 39th US President, Jimmy Earl Carter uses several rhetorical methods to get his point across to the American public. He rallies the audience to a common goal using diction, charged language, and rhetorical appeals like ethos and pathos. This is all in an attempt to help the citizens of America understand the necessity of confidence in our actions to fight against foreign dependence in the energy crisis. Carter utilizes diction to prove the necessity of his argument through using the repetition of statements pertaining to confidence in one’s actions.

Read More
1620 Words | 7 Pages

In 1979, 15 July, Jimmy Carter, the president of America gave a speech “A Crisis of Confidence”. Only three years ago, on the same day, he just accepted the nomination of his party to be a president of the United States. Also, he was the 39th president of the United States, who represented the Democratic Party. Actually, he has been on service in the army when he was young, and has been the governor of Georgia. When he was in power, he made a lot of contributions to the country and the world, such as establishing diplomatic relations with China and some other communism countries, helping negotiate the war between Israel and Egypt.

Read More
1568 Words | 7 Pages

“Killing Reagan: The Violent Assault That Changed a Presidency is a book by Bill O’Reilly and Martin Dugard. The book is a biographical depiction of President Ronald Reagan, including a look at his career as an actor, marriage to Nancy Reagan, an assassination attempt during his presidency, and eventual physical and mental decline. In 1937, at the age of 26, Ronald Reagan moved to Los Angeles and began acting in movies. He married Jane Wyman in January of 1940.

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout American history, there have been numerous shifts and changes in politics and in the government. From the time George Washington was sworn into office in 1789 to Andrew Johnson’s assumption of presidency in 1808, one of the most prominent changes is the transformation of the presidential power and interpretation of the Constitution. As time goes on, the influence of the president gradually expands and evolves from a tightly constrained role into a significantly powerful position. The authority of the president grows along with the expansion of the nation's prosperity and prestige in the world. During the Revolutionary War in the late 18th century, the Founding Fathers created America and established a new system of governing.

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

However that decision was the star of 14 months of fear for the American people that were taken prisoners. Carter lacked the ability to make difficult decisions and the power to seek the better solution even if that way of obtaining the solution was by going behind his own believes. Carter showed the world that the President must be a person that can lead the country in times of need and be overall good person. They must be able to make decisions that are out of their comfort zone but that are still in line with all of America 's

Read More
1702 Words | 7 Pages

Smith, Craig R. "Jimmy Carter – A National Disgrace." World Net Daily. WND.com, 21 Aug. 2006. Web. 22 Dec. 2016.

Read More
1102 Words | 5 Pages

Carter was not reelected after his four years of being president, but he continued to bring peace in foreign nations and help the United States with foreign relationships. Overall most people considered Jimmy Carter to be a president who did not do as much as he should have as president. Carter’s failures are what the people see instead of his improvements he made to foreign policy and the United States economy. Instead of people seeing how Carter ended the war between Israel and Egypt all they saw was how Carter failed to rescue the hostages from Tehran. Two things that people often forget is how Carter deregulated airlines and beer.

Read More
1202 Words | 5 Pages

Researchers who are studying the 1953 Iranian Coup, or operation AJAX as it is known, have speculated and often wondered what the involvement of the United States CIA and British Intelligence truly was. Why did this have to have taken place in the first place is often asked. What was so critical in this sphere of the world that made the world powers of the United States and Great Britain deem it necessary to get rid of the lawfully elected prime minister at the time, Mohammad Mossadeq, and impart their own choice for this position while propping up the Shah? This was a time when the British Empire was unraveling. Newly elected British prime minister Winston Churchill, “was committed to stopping his country’s empire from unraveling further.”

Read More
1407 Words | 6 Pages

“It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a historian to gain access to the CIA archives on the 1953 coup in Iran.” (Abrahamian, 2001, p. 182) For decades, the lack of available government documents on the 1953 Coup in Iran has made constructing a cohesive narrative of the factors leading up to the coup an immense challenge for historians. However, by comparing the details from other sources, it is possible to determine that the Anglo-Iranian Oil Crisis and the Cold War were the driving factors that led the Central Intelligence Agency and British M16 to stage a coup d’état against Mohammad Mossadeq.

Read More
1076 Words | 5 Pages

In 1979, a large scale revolution in Iran led to the fall of the Shah and the rise to power of a new, more religious leader: Ayatollah Khomeini. This event, later known as the Iranian Revolution, marked a drastic change in the ideals and culture of Iran. The United States, a Western country, was against the Islamic Revolution for many reasons, and had a very different perspective on this event than Iran. The contrasting American and Iranian perspectives are demonstrated by how they portray each other and themselves in various sources.

Read More

More about How Did Faulty Foreign Policy Lead To Jimmy Carter Downfall

Related Topics

Open Document