ipl-logo

How Did Hammurabi Laws Affect Families

402 Words2 Pages

King Hammurabi created a set of 282 laws, thousands of years ago in a city called Babylonia to give peace. I think Hammurabi’s Code wasn’t just because it hurt the families, it’s punishment for property was to harsh and unfair to other people, and it wasn’t fair to personal injury. First of all, Hammurabi’s Code hurt the family. For example, Document C mentioned in Law 129 that if a women cheated on another man they shall be bined and thrown into the ocean. Also, in Document C it mentioned in Law 195 that if a son struck his father his hands shall be cut of. So based on what I read, Hammurabi’s Laws for families were not just because it negatively affected the family. This shows that Hammurabi didn’t think well of his actions on punishments. As you can see Hammurabi’s Laws for family was not just. …show more content…

For instance, Document D mentioned in Law 21 that if a man broken through a house to rob he shall be hanged on the hole he has made. Also, Document D mentioned in Law 48 if a man borrowed money to plant his field and if a storm destroyed it he shall not pay his creditor the following year. Based on what I read, these laws were not just because it didn’t positively affect personal property. This is important because now we know that Hammurabi didn’t give another chance to someone who did a crime. As you can see, Hammurabi’s Laws for personal property was

Show More
Related
148 Words | 1 Pages

Hammurabi’s was unjust because most of his laws were harsh Evidence (Fact from articles, notes, passages etc. to inform about topic of paragraph, including citation) Commentary (In writer’s own words tell how this piece of evidence supports your baby thesis) Evidence (Fact from articles, notes, passages etc. to inform about topic of paragraph, include citations) Commentary (In writer’s own words tell how this piece of evidence supports your baby thesis)

Read More
531 Words | 3 Pages

In law 48 it states that if a man loans money to someone for crops and a storm comes and ruins them, the person that borrowed the money doesn’t have to pay it back for another year. This is fair because the loaner is taking the chance, knowing that something may happen, and that’s his decision. In Law 53 and 54 it states that if a man opens his trench to water his crops and floods the neighbors crops on accident, he must replace all the crops he has destroyed. This is fair because he destroyed the crops and the other farmer may have been depending on those crops to feed his family. Hammurabi’s Property Laws were fair much like his Personal-Injury

Read More
1465 Words | 6 Pages

Hammurabi’s code was created as a mechanism to control society. People were given rules and laws to follow because it kept people under control. People had property ownership and families to protect, so these laws were created to have them be secured. For example, Law 22 states, “If any one is committing a robbery and is caught, then he shall be put to death.” This law protects people’s assets and punishes the ones who violate the law.

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

Were Hammurabi's Law Codes Just or Unjust? Hammurabi was highly biased, selfish, and violent. He expected no one to have room for error or imperfection. If people did make mistakes it most definitely could cost them their life and or their family, property, or cause personal injury. Hammurabi came to the throne in Baybalon in 1792 BCE.

Read More
1138 Words | 5 Pages

Hammurabi’s code gives judgements and consequences for certain crimes. The punishment for a crime depended on one’s social rank. There were essentially three classes; the priests and noble landlords, the freemen, and slaves. Each law illustrated the division in the societies social status. As a particular law read; “If a man has destroyed the eye of another free man, his own eye shall be destroyed.

Read More
403 Words | 2 Pages

Hammurabi’s code is just because of its family law. The family law makes it just because they make it fair for the family to move on after struggles. According to law 195 if a son has struck his own father he shall have his hands cut off so he can 't hit his father anymore. So I think it 's fair because he can 't hit his family members can 't hurt them any more so it 's keeping his family safe.

Read More
103 Words | 1 Pages

These examples show that Hammurabi's code was unjust because this law was a very extreme law for just cheating on her husband. Instead what I think what should happen is that the man should just disinherit her instead of drowning her and the man she was cheating with.because what is happening you're just losing people and I don’t think want to join this empire if these laws are so extreme. And if your son hits you and get his chopped that is really extreme punishment but what if the son is just a little boy playing with his father or upset at him.

Read More
541 Words | 3 Pages

Upper-class members had to have harsher punishments that someone normal. Hammurabi’s code was guilty until proven innocent, unlike america it is innocent until proven guilty. Hammurabi once stated “to make justice visible in the land, to destroy the wicked person and the evil-doer, that the strong might not injure the weak." Hammurabi also wanted to make it possible that upper-class people won’t be robbed or killed as much as usual, his one of his code’s stated "If a man has destroyed the eye of a man of the gentleman class, they shall destroy his eye .... If he has destroyed the eye of a commoner ...

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

This law seems, as well, too harsh. The son should get a punishment but getting your hands cut off for hitting his father would lead to son being scared. In conclusion, Hammurabi 's code is unjust. The evidence shows that the Personal Injury Laws didn’t protect all people equally, the Property Laws punishments were too harsh, and the Family Laws can cause someone 's death.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

King Hammurabi’s codes were unjust because of the evidence found in the 282 laws. The codes that King Hammurabi wrote about were personal injury law, property law and family law. First, there is evidence that the codes were unjust. The first, code was personal injury law.

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

Was Hammurabi’s code just? Nearly 4,000 years ago, a man named Hammurabi became king of a city state called babylon. Hammurabi made a very important code in 18th century B.C.E. Hammurabi made 282 laws and he made these codes to protect the weak and poor from the strong. There are areas of law where Hammurabi’s code can be shown to be both, just and unjust. These are Family Law, Property Law, and Personal Injury Law.

Read More
334 Words | 2 Pages

Thus this proves that Hammurabi 's law is important in keeping people and their possessions safe. Hammurabi 's laws were helpful and fair to the people. Laws like that helped the society become even stronger by keeping people who were done wrong out of the streets. Laws in our time and Hammurabi 's time were important and in the future laws will still help protect people and their property just like they did in Hammurabi

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

Hammurabi's code and the modern laws have several similarities and differences. For example, they are both intended to maintain order in society. However, Hammurabi’s code is far more violent than modern law. Also, they have different ways of handling things, different punishments, and different social structure. One way that Hammurabi’s Code and the Modern Laws are different is because Hammurabi’s Code is strictly based on social structure.

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

Hammurabi's laws that were concerned with family, property, and injury were unfair. Hammurabi's laws that dealt with family were cruel and harsh. In law 129, it states that if a married woman is caught cheating, the woman and the other man will be tied together and would be drowned. Although, the man who was

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

Funk and Wagnall New World Encyclopedia wrote, “The basis of criminal law is that of equal retaliation, comparable to the Semitic law of ‘an eye for an eye’”(“Hammurabi, Code of” 1). Hammurabi was the first to make the law code meaning he was the first to start the foundation for our law system today. He was the father of law and today his justice code is still apparent today. The code of Hammurabi was designed to protect the weak, which includes: women, children and slaves. Funk and Wagnall wrote, “It seeks to protect the weak and the poor, including women, children, and slaves, against injustice at the hands of the rich and powerful”(Hammurabi, Code of” 1).

Read More

More about How Did Hammurabi Laws Affect Families

Related Topics

Open Document