ipl-logo

How Did John Locke Encourage The Ratification Of The Constitution

1219 Words5 Pages

In Federalists No. 10, one of the strongest pieces of the Federalists Papers that pushed and helped in the ratification of the constitution, James Madison argues factions, the threat they pose and his ideas of how to secure an outcome; and with the influence of John Locke successfully creates a document that encouraged the acceptance of the Constitution. Madison wanted a nation under one republic, he wanted to guarantee a strong union, one that no enemy could conquer whether it be an enemy country or a majority of the people right in America’s backyard. Locke also believed a strong nation required obedience from all and had very specific understandings of what man and governments roles were from which one can tell Madison drew from on his understanding …show more content…

He believed that people were born with reason and in with that came common interests and peace, but he also knew that people would need something to act as a third party in natural brawls. He supported a government that would take action when needed but other-wise stay at bay. When this government made appearance at times in need of control the people would willingly consent to a social contract, which was the notion of at times for the good of the people losing some freedoms. With this government, and its powers came the important opportunity for the people to discard the representatives that they felt were not governing for the people. Locke knew that man was easily influence by self-interest, and if man governed man that wouldn’t it be only natural for government to become a self-interested tool for its own consumption of power and benefits; Madison’s theories constantly worried of a central government that would obtain too much power. Both Locke and Madison gave key sight to these problematic occurrences, and strategically purposed ways to eliminate a …show more content…

10 and no. 51, in regards with factions. Madison proposed a large republic, in which the minority and majority could chose representatives, the most properly informed, to make decisions without disregarding the good/interests of the other. In this Madison also expresses the loyalty of the representatives is demanding, which is very similar to Locke’s view on the on the government’s obligation and duty to never serve against the people and always in the best interest of the people. In Locke’s suggestion of the three branches he also bring along with it the urge for checks and balances, an urge that Madison acknowledged and engaged in densely when trying to establish the Constitution as a savior. As Madison stated, “government…greatest of all reflections on human nature” (Madison Federalist no. 51), Locke also, to a lesser extent, agreed, rather introduced this thought. If man is subjected to selfishness through human nature, and man runs government, than wouldn’t it be true that government can become a pit of greediness and self-indulgence? This is why both Locke and Madison favored and praised the ideas of checks and balances and the people being able to rid those in leading positions who they did not see fit in serving them. Both Locke and Madison agreed with the government being available for the people, to help the people but also

Show More
Related
245 Words | 1 Pages

“How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny?” In the year of 1787, delegates met in Philadelphia to write the Constitution. Tyranny, which is a type of government with an absolute ruler, was a fear. For James Madison and the delegates, it was a challenge for them to write the Constitution that could be strong enough to hold the people and the states together without anybody taking over too much control. James Madison’s idea between central and state governments if Federalism (Document A).

Read More
1418 Words | 6 Pages

He believed the local state assemblies abused their powers, only spoke for their local interest, changed their membership constantly, and enacted unjust laws. He believed ratifying the Constitution to a strong central government was the only option for the young country to succeed. Madison adopted David Hume’s idea, a strong republican government might perform better in a large setting rather that a small one. He convinced the American public of this idea through a series called the Federalist Papers. Madison thought a citizen’s rights were more protected with a central government rather than a local state government.

Read More
375 Words | 2 Pages

From the 16th to 18th century, countries in Europe were experiencing new ideas and reforms. Philosophers like Locke believed in social equality. They have discussed the purpose of a government and spread their ideas. Locke’s ideas led to the revolution in France, who didn’t have rights under absolute monarch’s control. After the French gained their rights, people in Haiti started to fight because they wanted to have the same rights that French gained during the reform.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Madison’s essay reflects the fear many had of a tyrannical government and the desire to ensure that the country didn’t revert back to that which it had just escaped from. He notes the necessity to prevent any one faction or group from gaining too much power and oppressing those in the minority. The separation of powers was set in place to ensure that this could not happen. Even if one group decides they want something, the other two have the equal authority to prevent it should it not represent the country as a whole.

Read More
422 Words | 2 Pages

In federalist Paper 10, James Madison supports the ratification of the constitution and the republican government by explaining how it would take care of and control problems caused by factions. Right of the bat he addresses h factions are integral to a country that has liberty and differences in people. Madison makes it clear that there is no possible way to remove factions without violating the rights of the people. He follows through with an explanation on how a republican government would be the best solution to handle such factions and how that would be implemented.

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.

Read More
835 Words | 4 Pages

John Locke was a philosopher, and political scientist. He believed democracy was a considerably better form of government than a monarchy. Thomas Jefferson was the third U.S. president, and was one of America’s founding fathers. He was the author of the Declaration of Independence, and played a key role in the institution of the United States of America. John Locke was a very influential person when it came to Thomas Jefferson and the ideas within the Declaration of Independence.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

10 in an attempt to ratify the Constitution, the new form of government for the United States. In the Federalist Paper No. 10, Madison analyzed the way to deal with facts, made a comparison between a pure democracy and a republic, and made another comparison on whether a small government or a large government would be the best for America. He informed the people that there is not a way to completely get rid of factions, but there are ways to deal with them. One great way to deal with factions is by having a government that knows how to control and deal with their effects. Madison believes that a republic can do that job better than a democracy, because a democracy is a small society of people who can not admit there is a cure to factions.

Read More
630 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist papers are a series of documents created by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. The papers discuss how the new government system that was beginning to be developed in the 1780s was going to work and be carried out. The authors wanted to write the Federalist papers to create a document that would help to interpret the United States constitution. Federalist papers #10 and #51 were both written by James Madison.

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

Under this type of government one groups interests are always expressed, and consequently, there is always a perpetual loser. This is not what Madison had in mind when he wrote Federalist 10, instead he argues that as long as there are multiple factions competing, the control, and therefore interests of the government should be moderate, as well as changing. He goes into more depth, arguing that a representative form of government is ideal, due to the representative’s ability to effectively represent smaller populations, such as states. He continues to explain that factitious leaders might be able to “kindle a flame”, but would be unable to progress their movement throughout the states due to a series of checks and balances. He describes to the reader that each branch of the government would have some control over the other, balancing out the governmental power, thus keeping the effects of factions to a minimum.

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

Outline on Federalist No. 10 • The instability, injustice and confusion in public council are the mortal diseases in popular governments. • James Madison tells us that valuable improvement made by constitution on the popular models for both ancient and modern cannot certainly admired, but they have effectually obviated the danger. • Madison gave the explanation about complaints heard from citizens on unstable government and measures decided by superior force of interest or major parties, but not by justice and rights of minor parties. • Factions are group of people who are against the government and get united for common impulse and adverse to the rights of other citizens or permanent and aggregated interests of the community. • Madison tells

Read More
319 Words | 2 Pages

The sole purpose of government, according to John Locke, was to support all citizens and their natural rights as well as protect and defend them at all times. As long as citizens were given their natural rights and equal treatment they were capable of civilly governing themselves. John Locke advised that a country’s government is in a binding social contract with its people; for the transfer of some rights to the government the people will in turn receive protection of their rights and pursuit of liberty and happiness. If ever violated this contract their own citizens would rebel against them. This dissolution can be a result of change in government, due to the violation of the citizen’s liberty.

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

In The Second Treatise of Government, John Locke examines man’s transition from a state of freedom and equality, to a state of civil government with legislative and executive power. Locke believes that by nature people are free. He believes that people’s natural rights consist of life, liberty and property. He also strongly believes that laws and governing are only necessary where something goes wrong. With this being said, Locke thinks it would be only naturally right that no one man has more power over another.

Read More
1248 Words | 5 Pages

67). Locke would make the government protect its subjects at all costs, and if so it should do anything to maintain its status quo. But this should only be allowed if it is consented to do so or the government would not be beneficial towards its citizens. In its entirety John Locke would want the government to do anything within its power to benefit its citizens, as long as it is reasonable and just to do so in the first place. John Locke in the next step of the process of making society a better place by making the people not force anything upon people or to make them act in certain ways which they are not willing to as it can put a negative impact on themselves.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

John Locke was a philosopher and political scientist. He had many interests and produced a number of writings that influenced future leaders. One of these leaders was Thomas Jefferson, who was involved with the aid of America and the act gaining independence from Britain. The Declaration of Independence and Locke’s views on government contain many similar aspects. These ideas includes the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (natural rights); the protection that is provided by the government for these rights; and the altering or abolishment of government if it fails to provide and protect the rights of the people.

Read More

More about How Did John Locke Encourage The Ratification Of The Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document