ipl-logo

How Did John Locke Justify Absolutism

761 Words4 Pages

During the seventeenth century and centuries before many European countries had monarchies that followed the ideas of the “divine right”. This meant that the king had absolute power and his power came from God, therefore no one would oppose the king because it would be going against God’s will. However, in England there was a constitutional monarchy. The English king and Parliament governed the nation together but, conflict soon arose between the English king and Parliament in the late seventeenth century. The struggle between the two for power would cause England to be ingulfed in civil war and cause other problems. Thomas Hobbes quote is a valid statement in justifying absolutism because he states the problems that occurs when there isn’t a sole ruler, therefore absolutism is needed to keep order. Seventeenth century England is a prime example of the problems that can occur when there isn’t an absolute ruler with full control of his nation. …show more content…

The new rulers of England were now William of Orange and his wife Mary and this conformation was known as a “Glorious Revolution”. However, this leads into two major response with completely different ideas. Thomas Hobbs and John Locke are the two political thinkers that will affect the thoughts of other with their ideas of a good government. Thomas Hobbs believes that absolutism is needed to keep order and peace among the people. This is a valid point because once England got rid of it monarchy the government wasn’t as stable, and therefore they restored if after the death of Cromwell. On the other hand, John Locke believed that if the government didn’t protect the natural rights of the people and if they didn’t do good by the people, then the people had a right to form a new government. These two ideas will linger in Europe affecting the way people in different countries view their government

Show More
Related

Impact Of John Locke On Political Philosophies

785 Words | 4 Pages

As teens rebel against their mothers, so to did America rebel against the British during the 18th Century. However, also like children they followed their mother’s footsteps. Oliver Cromwell led a revolt against the Staurt monarchy and similarly colonists revolted against the British. During this time, an English philosopher named John Locke wrote works on political philosophies, mainly against the Stuarts. John Locke would have believed that the American colonists justified their resentments against the British especially, since the British stole their fundamental rights of liberty, property, and life.

Read More

The Enlightenment Dbq Essay

1016 Words | 5 Pages

Two Philosophers had similar ideas that the government should protect citizens’ rights. John Locke believed that governments only duty

Read More

How Did The Enlightenment Influence The American Government

135 Words | 1 Pages

John Locke had the idea that if the government was unfit to rule and not protecting the rights of the people, then the citizens had the right to overthrow the government. This is shown in America when Americans wrote the Declaration of

Read More

The Enlightenment Dbq Essay

530 Words | 3 Pages

For example Locke, argued that people should be allowed to choose their own government, as it will have a greater chance of not failing. Locke said, “The people are at liberty to provide for themselves, by erecting a new legislative,... for the society can never,... lose the native and original right it has to preserve itself, which can only be a done by a settled legislative and a fair and impartial execution of the laws made by it” (Document A). John is stating that it shouldn't be the government who makes all the decisions but the people as it is their right to do so. John Locke was just one of the four figures in the enlightenment that made an impact.

Read More

Thomas Hobbes And John Locke: The Barbarity Of The English Civil War

1863 Words | 8 Pages

In the middle of the 17th century, as the absolute power of monarchs began to wane, political scientists debated the question as to who was legitimately entitled to govern a state. While the traditional justification for a monarch’s power was the “Divine Right of Kings”, this had lost much of its authority over the previous centuries, and by 1642 the debate had reached its peak in the form of the English Civil War. What ensued was one of the darkest periods in Britain’s history, pitting the Monarchists against the Parliamentarians in a deadly conflict that would lead to the deaths of over 200,000 Britons. Due to the fact they they supported opposing sides, in the aftermath of Parliament’s victory and the execution of King Charles I, the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke would forever be altered.

Read More

How Did John Locke's Beliefs Affect Today

394 Words | 2 Pages

Many of the things Locke spoke of still affects today’s society. John was a social contrast theorists, which is a view that a person’s moral and political obligation are dependent on an agreement among them to form the society they live in which was given to them by equality. He did not only believe in equality in government but in religion too. John believed that religion

Read More

Compare And Contrast Machiavelli And John Locke

767 Words | 4 Pages

Locke’s ideas from the Two Treatises of Government and An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, were based upon the natural rights where power comes from the people. Both of his pieces contributed to revolutions, most importantly the American Revolution as power from monarchies was removed and democracies were created. Allowed for limited government power and all obligations were to the citizens. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding basis was on how the knowledge existence of God, certain moral truths, and laws of logic or mathematics pertained to the natural rights of

Read More

John Locke Vs Hobbes

516 Words | 3 Pages

Most communities today rely on a basic form of government whether it be a democracy or a monarchy. If government was taking away the simple fact can be argued that chaos would break loose or people will naturally be peaceful. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both delved into the ideal government of the people. Both agreed in a form of government should be established to keep some kind of peace, but both ideas differed in the way the government function. After analyzing both philosophers, it should be that a government should be established based on human's nature to sin, but Locke’s ideas are perceived to be more developed in a realistic government applied today.

Read More

Absolutism In The Renaissance

327 Words | 2 Pages

Absolutism is the formal release from guilt, obligation, or punishment. Europe used absolutism as how the king ruled his kingdom. This meant that the king and his advisors was not limited by nobles, common people, or even their representatives. The Renaissance played a part in developing Absolutism. Absolutism was made in the renaissance by how the kings wanted a central government.

Read More

Absolutism Vs Constitutionalism

519 Words | 3 Pages

In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, people started to question the logic of having a single all-powerful ruler. Naturally, the monarchy fought this challenge to their authority by parading divine right and the issues of constitutionalism. However, constitutionalism eliminates the danger of having a bad king and the issue of divine right while also maintaining order. Absolutism lacks constitutionalism’s validity as a form of government. In a constitutional government, every citizen must follow a set of laws, even the king.

Read More

Absolutist Monarchy

520 Words | 3 Pages

Certain groups believed the monarch should work together with people and state, others thought of their country running only off taxes and payment. Then there are those

Read More

Kevin Sharpe: The Magic And Mystique Of Monarchy

556 Words | 3 Pages

The early modern period has been characterised as one filled with deference, superstition, and religious fervour. Kevin Sharpe’s own interpretation reflects this portrayal, as he insists, ‘the magic and mystique of monarchy’ was still present during the 1640s - a time which Sharpe himself noted as one where ‘open disagreements and divisions’ began to appear. Therefore, Sharpe paints the picture of a public loyal to the monarch’s authority, in spite of their apparent discontent at the crown’s policies. Similarly, Glenn Burgess stresses contemporaries believed, that monarchs received their authority from God, and subsequently the people could not ‘resist or actively disobey’ the king. This is because the king was then only accountable to God:

Read More

Absolutism In The 17th And 18th Century

639 Words | 3 Pages

Prompt: Though absolute monarchy was established over much of Europe over the course of the 17th and 18th centuries, there were exceptions. Describe and explain the successes of at least two alternative political systems which emerged during this period. During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries of Europe, many countries were ruled by burgeoning monarchies. France was reigned over by the opulent sun king, Louis XIV, (whom had the longest reign of any European monarch) whilst Russia emerged under the powers of Peter and Catherine the Great. Due to constant warfare, religious turmoil, and economic upheaval, monarchs and monarchies across all of Europe had to persistently reinsert their absolutism in order to protect and ensure the longevity of their reigns, (many times of which

Read More

Compare And Contrast Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

1441 Words | 6 Pages

When comparing the two different accounts of English philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke we must take into consideration a number of things such as the age in which they lived and the time in which they produced their philosophical writings. We will however find out that these two philosophers actually have a couple of things in which agree on even though most of their opinions clash. On one side we have Thomas Hobbes who lived in the time of the English Civil War (1642-1651) who provides a negative framework for his philosophical opinions in his masterpiece Leviathan and who advocates for philosophical absolutism . On the other side we have John Locke, living during the glorious revolution (1688-1689) he presents a positive attitude in his book The Second Treatise of Government and advocates for philosophical and biblical constitutionalism. It is important that we know that the state of nature describes a pre- political society prior to the social contract.

Read More

John Locke Research Paper

1210 Words | 5 Pages

During the Glorious Revolution, the political system in England changed from absolute monarchy to the rule of parliament, which only supports Locke’s criticism regarding tyranny. “Men living together according to reason, without a common superior on earth with authority to judge between them is properly the state of nature.” (Locke, Second treatise) This reflects on Locke’s claim that men are by nature free and that God created all people naturally subjected to

Read More

More about How Did John Locke Justify Absolutism

Related Topics

Open Document