When Julius Caesar was named dictator for life, the Roman Republic received entirely new changes, plunging Rome to a new era. How Caesar will lead Rome is unknown but the Senate must now trust their new dictator into leading them in the right direction. With his great victories highlighting his successful military career, the Roman citizens accept Caesar as their new leader. Social, economic and political changes will obviously come with the abrupt change of government. There will obviously be tension between members of the Senate concerning Caesar’s rise for power. After ten years, Caesar was named dictator for life. Controversies and rebellions will arise but alliances will also be formed ad these could bring Rome greater riches. Rome was now turned into the Roman Republic, which began with the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom. It expanded with a …show more content…
Cimber was also a Senator. In 44 BC Caesar granted Cimber governorship of the provinces in Bithynia and Pontus. He was also named Praetor that same year. The power that the Senators used to have, had now been moved to Caesar’s hands. Cimber would greatly appeal to this type of power, firstly because of his already stated position in Caesar’s council, secondly, because of him being Praetor and his governorship over two territories of Rome. Cimber had great influence over Caesar. If a situation will emerge, causing Caesar to lose his dictatorship, Cimber would be left with almost nothing. Should it happen that Caesar gives up his dictatorship and the power of the Roman Senate is decentralized, would Cimber have to give up his positions of power? Yes, since they were granted by Caesar but he did not gave up the dictatorship, meaning that Cimber continued with his provinces and his high position of power in the Senate. By being a Praetor, Cimber is in charge of justice with the Roman citizens and positioning judges in matters that related to