1. Both the American President John Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev seemed to be realistic about the Cuban Missile Crisis. They both represented the states that were standing apart and had their self-interests in the events that occurred. Besides, from the realistic point of view, Kennedy understood that the only way to withstand the crisis and prevent the new war would be to show their power, which is essential within the Realist framework, and take active actions since the interest of the state required that. Besides, being realists, both leaders understood that there is no way to involve the non-governmental organizations in the solution. Kennedy kept his realistic approach during the whole period. However, the actions of the Soviet Union could not be seen as realistic to a full extent since their requirement to remove the American missiles from Turkey as well might not have been responded positively, and they would not have the power …show more content…
During the problem associated with the Cuban Missile Crisis, Kennedy did not make his decisions on his own. After learning about the threat, he called for a group which was called EXCOMM. The group involved the government members who were seeking for the ways to address the issue. Some of the military leaders were acting based on the idea of power claiming the necessity to start military action immediately. However, Kennedy realized, considering the position of power of the USSR, that such actions might have destructive consequences. In that regard, Mc. Namara had an original idea, and it might be viewed as realistic. From the point of power, the United States had an advantage over the Soviet Union. Respectively, they could have made their opponent subject to their requirements. Besides, Robert Kennedy could also be regarded as a realist with respect to the situation since he supported the position of the President, basing the thoughts on the issue of power not only of the United States but also of the Soviet