Both Pennington and Baker deal with the issues surrounding Canadian trade agreements with the United States during the latter half of the nineteenth century and early twentieth century. However Pennington and Baker take vastly different viewpoints on the issue. Whereas Pennington takes the view that Laurier's Liberals were hoping for some sort of moderate trade agreement with the United States and support for a commercial Union, Baker deals with reciprocity and its ties to anti-Americanism. In addition, both authors tend to imply that the greater underlying question resulted into which economic orbit Canada would tie itself. MacDonald's Conservatives favouring to maintain the traditional economic alignment to Great Britain while the Liberals
The new navy would, he argued [Bourassa], draw Canadians into foreign conflicts. They would waste their “gold and blood” on issues that had nothing to do with them.” (Making History 49).Thus Laurier’s trouble kept increasing and the nation got more divided and
The Prime Minister Mackenzie King made it crystal clear that Canada can decide on its own foreign policy. This was completely different as in WWI Canada was forced to join the war without having a choice.
the British North America Act, 1867 (BNA Act), that legally created the Dominion of Canada was, in effect, Canada’s fifth constitution. The three constitutions immediately preceding the BNA Act established essential elements of liberal democracy, but the BNA Act was the first in which the novel and creative elements were designed by the colonists themselves, not their imperial masters (Russel, p. 115). The previous four constitutions of Canada was designed by Britain they had some influence towards it but the British North America Act 1867 (BNA Act) Was designed by the Canadians so it brought about like a feeling of independence to Canadians and it was the first steps to complete
The province of Quebec had wanted to separate from Canada for a decent amount of time. The thoughts of separation came in the late 1950’s and 1960’s, but was in full effect in the late 1960’s to the 1970’s, mostly due to the creation of the Parti Quebecois, created in 1968. It had become popular due to the party’s leader being René Lévesque, who was not only popular but influential too. In Canada, their urge to separate grew larger, for there were two moments in time, where they wanted to separate. In order for the province to separate, they had to have a referendum.
Newfoundland & Labrador Canada was well shaped after WWII as well as the great depression affected the economy and life was back on track. However, Newfoundland and Labrador’s struggled with much more during those times. On April 1949, Newfoundland and Labrador joined Canada’s confederation as it was the final remnant of the British empire on western shores. This event became an important part of our history since Newfoundland had close ties to trades within the rest of the country. This impacted my family heavily since my father was originally a potato farmer in Ireland.
This slow but steady change started during the War of 1812, when French Canadian settlers, British colonists, American Loyalists, freed slaves and Indigenous groups fought together to defend their homeland from American troops. Although Canada wouldn’t become independent from Britain until 1867, the War of 1812 brought together the people living in the colonies and “They did not fight the Americans because they were commanded to by the British, but rather as defenders of Canada.” (Russel Yost, “How Did The War of 1812 Affect Canada,” n.d, section 3, para. 2). Another pivotal event in the creation of the Canadian identity happened after the rebellions in Lower and Upper Canada from 1837-1838. Because of these revolts, Upper and Lower Canada were united under one name and government: British North America.
A new feeling of pride came along with the flag. About three-quarters of Canadians feel a sense of pride in Canada from displaying the Maple Leaf flag. Lester Pearson’s initiative and creative leadership brought a new flag along with a new sense of pride to Canada. Many Canadians feel united and proud under this
Canadian identity, when seen by its outlook of immigration, changed negatively during the 1920s to 1930s. Before the Military Service Act was passed, there were two main opposing sides which consisted of the Non-British immigrants, mainly the French Canadians. Who opposed the act from being passed. They felt no loyalty to either Britain or France thus reluctant to help in the war efforts. While, on the other side, Prime Minister Borden assembled his senior members of the Cabinet.
This was the first time Canada signed as an independent nation and not under
Lastly, Pearson created the Canadian identity by unveiling the new flag, bringing equality with
For example, when the Parti Québécois leader René Lévesque proposed a sovereignty-association with Canada, which would enable Quebec to have political independence however they would have close economic ties with Canada in 1980, a separation seemed possible (Archibald, 2016). The referendum for a consensus on the sovereignty-association, held in May of 1980, resulted in a 60 percent rejection and thus the sovereignty-association between Quebec and Canada was not carried out (Hudon, 2013). Although the sovereignty-association referendum had ultimately failed, the Parti Québécois were re-elected in 1981, indicating that separatism itself had not yet died in the province and thus, the threat of Quebec’s independence was still very present (Stein, 2006). Quebec also isolated themselves from Canada when they had disagreed with the patriated and new Constitution in 1981, as their government felt that they were still not equal in comparison to the other provinces (Gall, 2006). All things considered, Quebec’s possible freedom from Canada became a real possibility in the 1980s and the threat of separatism was a key factor in the change of Quebec
“Trudeaumania swept across Canada…for a few warm spring months in 1968 Pierre Elliot Trudeau synthesized the dreams, achievements, and illusions of the liberation era.” (Fellows and Wells, 2013). Trudeau ran under the slogan of creating “the Just Society” (Fellows and Wells, 2013) in Canada, and unlike Diefenbaker, Trudeau would manage to achieve what he promised the public. While Trudeau was in office he managed to implement reforms that expanded welfare, enabled parliament to be more efficient, and established true universal healthcare in Canada (Fellows and Wells, 2013) . All of these changes and reform were things that others had promised previous to Trudeau but constantly failed to
Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau is one of the world's greatest political leaders who shall be remembered for the greatest work and contribution to modern day Canadian society. He was adored by the public due to his extremely flamboyant lifestyle. His charisma and his charm led him to be a global icon of diplomacy and negotiation. The face of advocating for a united, independent Canada where nobody is treated differently or alienated he quickly found his presence in the hearts of Canadians everywhere, and among the ranks of the best leaders in the world. In only a matter of a few months of campaigning, his immensely unique style of leadership took over Canada in phenomena unlike any other known as “Trudeaumania”.
The present Canadian flag was officially adopted on February 15, 1965, after years of discussions, inquiries, and design submissions. The simplicity, originality, and powerful representation of Canadian identity in the design by George F. G. Stanley and John Matheson led to its selection. To summarize, the Canadian flag controversy had a lasting impact on Canadain politics. It gave Canadians an opportunity to rethink their sense of nationality and declare their independence from the British Empire. It also affected the dynamics among political parties, influenced Canada's position in international affairs, and served as a guide for other nations seeking to create their own unique national
