ipl-logo

How Did Martin Shkreli Raise The Price Of Daraprim?

524 Words3 Pages

This world is composed of two types of people, the selfish and selfless. Selfish people only have a concern for themselves and they do not worry about anyone else. On the other hand, selfless people are the exact opposite by showing great regards to others besides themselves. Martin Shkreli would happen to be one of the selfish people in this world. He raised the price on the drug Daraprim and now thousands of people are suffering because they cannot afford it and critics are pointing fingers at Shkreli for the many deaths. I believe that his action was very unethical and even though it is something legal, nothing should be done to harm the society. Everyone knows that it is not easy to maintain a business, especially with so many rivaling companies trying to also become number one. But doing something to only benefit yourself should be a last resort. Martin Shkreli claims that he raised the price of Daraprim because it is “underpriced relative to its peers” and the new improvements made on the drug are quite exceptional in treating …show more content…

Drugs made to cure diseases should be reasonably priced so that the people who need them can actually purchase them; otherwise, what is the point in making these drugs? Upon hearing the insults thrown at him, Martin Shkreli claims that the media is only inventing this “wild and crazy and unlikely story” to take his money away from him (Nicholas). He says that he spend lots of time thinking about human suffering. I think that Shkreli is insufferable. If he even cared for people in the slightest way, he would do something about the overpriced drug that the sick cannot even afford anymore. What is he going to do with all his money? Money cannot buy everything and there will come a time when Shkreli realizes that he has made a great mistake, harming thousands of people just for his

Show More
Related
498 Words | 2 Pages

Legal rules currently do not sufficiently discourage predatory pricing of prescription drugs, in this case EpiPens. The price of EpiPens rising in the pharmaceutical industry is legal and immoral. However, Mylan Pharmaceuticals may have violated the antitrust law in its EpiPen sales to schools. In 1890 the United States passed down the antitrust law also known as the Sherman Act. The Sherman Act regulates the conduct and organization of business corporations in order to promote fair competition and outlaw monopolistic business practices.

Read More
651 Words | 3 Pages

Jay Gould, a robber baron, drove competitors to the ground, paid poor wages, and forced employees to work under dangerous conditions. Mark Zuckerberg, a captain of industry, raises productivity, expands more markets, and creates more jobs. Their individual philosophies of wealth influenced Gould and continue to influence Zuckerberg. While Gould was able to corrupt public officials and persuade them to interpret laws in his favor, it is challenging for millionaires of today to successfully do that. As time has gone on, it has become a lot more challenging to manipulate the system due to laws put in place, such as minimum wage laws and the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Read More
1028 Words | 5 Pages

Many believe that the FDA has financial reasons for allowing a drug to be on the market. In 2006, a study found that” in 22% of advisory board meetings, more than half the members had direct financial in the companies whose medial products they evaluated or their rivals”. The FDA’s advisory boards should not be able to vote on companies that they have financial ties to. The FDA says they do the best they can to create an unbiased board, but it is difficult to find “top medical experts with no ties” to pharmaceutical companies. Since a number of people have complained about this, Congress decided to make the FDA cut twenty-five percent of the advisory board that has financial ties with the pharmaceutical company being evaluated over the next five years.

Read More
1408 Words | 6 Pages

In Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad and “Speedy drug approvals are risky, but drug companies have another idea that’s just terrible” show how good and safe intentions are needed to be sacrificed in order to get profit and evilness. In Heart of Darkness the main character marlow who visits a company who is interested in ivory in the congo who first believes the company is doing good deeds and finds out the horrible truth of its real goals. In the article written by David Lazarus talks about the good and safe intentions President Trump has for companies and people and reveals the hunger for profit of evil companies. Marlow visits a company in the congo that 's working in getting ivory.

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

In fact, this is what has made him launch the famous Open Society Foundations. He observed and witnessed so many people being exploited while others being killed

Read More
846 Words | 4 Pages

But for rare occasions, the government’s position is also clear, like when “You have to make a decision between having drugs at a high price and having no drugs at all”. The two major provider of research dollars for the development of such inventive treatments i.e. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and the National Institute of Health (NIH) is at the centre of this debate. It is interesting to note that, the NIH has received five such march-in requests and has denied every one. This contention of NIH maintains the stand of the government that the march-in right is not a cost control measure but rather a measure to ensure federally funded inventions being made available to the public.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Level headed discussions are extraordinary over how the area is relied upon to work. In this amount driving records in area, NGOs, government, the restorative group, and scholarly world open deliberation and propose answers for the ethical issue of medication industry lead. They investigate such perspectives as the capacity of patent assurance and protected innovation rights, the morals and monetary essentials of study and restorative trials, medicate showcasing, promoting, and

Read More
240 Words | 1 Pages

Martin Shkreli faced a challenge of privilege and failed it. He used his leadership position to achieve personal material gain(Hackman & Johnson, 2013) and tried to justify it as he had no choice. Of course, there is no doubt that leaders face challenging decisions that might impact employees or customers in a negative way. However, they should always keep in mind ethical standards, because if something is legally acceptable might not mean it’s morally

Read More
1904 Words | 8 Pages

The Trouble with Billionaires is an insightful book about many key issues that the world is faced with today that is caused by billionaires, some of these issues include things like monopolies and how they are not only harmful and potentially dangerous for economies but also how they cause harm for society. The book highlights many of the societal dangers and social injustices that are associated with the inequalities of wealth, income and political power. The Trouble with Billionaires tries to bring light to the many issues that are caused and faced by billionaires even though they are such a small percentage of the population. The book states that in 2013 there were at least 1400 individual billionaires in the world. (Brooks & McQuaig, 2010).

Read More
1087 Words | 5 Pages

Every citizen in the United States has individual rights protected by the Constitution. This protection also includes businesses that have gone through the legal process to become a legal entity ; more commonly known as becoming a corporation. Many times these individual rights, protected by the Constitution, conflict with the common good and as history shows, the courts consistently side with the common good when faced with a case that pits these two against each other. Big Pharma are corporations exercising their individual rights to market, and sell their product to consumers. In the process, the common good is suffering.

Read More
950 Words | 4 Pages

Hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, and even insurance firms all seem to be benefiting off of the misfortunes of people they are supposed to be helping. The development of our species through technology is supposed to be one of the main reasons humans thrive, but when that technology is leveraged, it just turns back into something that is no longer in reach. The very thing that is supposed to bring joy to families and even generations of people is commoditized. Why would someone sell a drug for a dollar when they could sell it for 500, and since people depend on it to live they have to buy it. This bring to mind a recent event where Martin Shkreli escalated a 62-year-old HIV drug

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

The brand-name drugs are more expensive than generics; and the doctors who receive payments from the pharmaceutical industry prescribe more brand-name drugs to their patients (“The Cost of,” 2016).

Read More
998 Words | 4 Pages

Driven by the sole motive of maximization of their profits by cashing in on the value and importance of a life saving drug (the in elastic demand for it) they just turned a blind eye to it all. The governments were pretending to be blissfully ignorant about the actual cost of manufacturing the

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

There is a distinct and terrifying lack of any consistent and justifiable formula for prescription drug pricing. Of course, there are considerations that factor into how a manufacture determines a price point for a drug, such as patent protection, availability of generics or similar drugs, and treatment objective, but there doesn’t seem to be any relation to actual research and development expenses, which is what the industry touts as their biggest explanation for sky-high prices. i. Pharmaceutical companies have priced their products at a profit percentage higher than any other industry. The United States’ healthcare system has complicated pricing because there are three masters: payer, provider, & patient.

Read More
1068 Words | 5 Pages

Why? Mainly because of very high prices of ARVs and international patents that didn’t allow the drugs to be manufactured at cheaper prices causing mass destruction. The main problems that are highlighted in the documentary are high prices of the drugs (which lead to higher deaths), Restrictions on imports, patenting of drugs (cheaper generic drugs couldn’t be manufactured) and monopoly by big pharmaceutical companies ( leading to higher prices of life saving drugs) and players at stake were Pfizer, Cipla, Private Companies and generic drugs

Read More

More about How Did Martin Shkreli Raise The Price Of Daraprim?

Related Topics

Open Document