ipl-logo

How Did Oj Simpson Commited The Crime

445 Words2 Pages

Orenthal James Simpson aka O.J Simpson is a murderer that commited the crime in a professional way can be said. This is cause he actually planned the crime and also at same night he was leaving to Chicago. This act was to done to make the enforcement and forensic authorities to be confused. However, O.J Simpson left numerous evidence and the main evidence was the footprint that actually was the main evidence that solved this case. O.J Simpson and his wife Nicole Brown Simpson have been divorce for afew months. This divorce was done due to she was being tortured by O.J Simpson and she decided to leave him and brought her 2 kids along with her. O.J Simpson found out that Nicole Brown has been keeping in touch with white guy is known as Ronald Goldman. One evening, Nicole went for dinner and Ronald …show more content…

The neighbor heard Nicole dogs was barking in crying while they were watching television, and they ran out and saw 2 bodies were found lying at the floor and the stairs. O.J Simpson went back home and got ready to leave to Chicago. The F.B.I forensic team came to the crime scene and also went to O.J Simpsons house as he was the primary suspect of the murder. F.B.I forensic manage to find numerous evidence where the strongest evidence were the footprint which on the blood and also the 3 blood DNA matches the DNA found on O.J Simpson gloves and also the fibre that were found in his hat. However the trial took place for a long period and at the end of the trial O.J Simpson was found innocent. However, another trial took place and this moment of time the shoe print that were found on the blood spatter DNA matches and O.J Simpsons were found guilty. The evidence found and had DNA on it was the blood spatter, blood on the socks, hair found on the hat and also blood that were in the vehicle that was being drove by O.J

Show More
Related
762 Words | 4 Pages

The only clothing on the crime scene had belonged to Jamie, his yellow cloth from his sweater had been all over the crime scene. The detective, Mattie Gunderson had stated that all the evidence did lead to the investigation of Jamie Rogers, which is why the accused had been charged. The defence had also argued that Devon Moore didn’t think that Jamie was the murder which is an opinionated statement. There is no hard evidence that Jamie isn’t guilty, the evidence all points to Jamie Rogers. The blood found on Jamie's clothing had belonged to Pasternak and given the situation the two were in, there was tension between the two.

Read More
945 Words | 4 Pages

The cases of O.J. Simpson and Lizzie Borden are two court cases in American history that are 100 years apart, conversely are very parallel. On both occasions the verdict comes to be the same: not guilty. Circumstantial evidence, which is defined as evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion or fact, was heavily utilized in the process of prosecuting both subjects. Both Orenthal James Simpson and Lizzie Borden should be found guilty of murder due to the continuous number of things that prove their guilt.

Read More
1160 Words | 5 Pages

They also found that Kercher's DNA had not been present on the knife found at Soleccito's flat.(Amanda Knox 2). This proof implies that Knox and Sollecito cannot be guilty unless further investigation proves the previous claim wrong. There were many controversial evidences that turned out to be supporting that Knox is not guilty. The knife that was the supposed "murder weapon" had no blood on it, it didn't match any of the wounds made on Meredith's body, and the knife couldn't have made the bloody imprint that was on the bed. Forensic Scientists never stated that the luminal indicated that it was blood, nor was there any blood found in the apartment that connected the two to the murder, therefore this is also an unreliable source to use for the

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

11 of the 12 murder victims that were examined during the trial had "hair and fiber matches" with Williams' surroundings that were so convincing that these victims could be definitively

Read More
670 Words | 3 Pages

The state's most compelling evidence is that of the coat, they found evidence of Mr. Rodgers DNA on the bottom of the coat. The problem with this is that the defense proved the point that if he had murdered Mr. Rodgers, then blood would have been all over the jacket, which there wasn’t. Equally important to point out is that they should have searched for shoes, and pants when they scoured his house. Considering they both should have had blood residue or particulates on them. They stated that he could have taken the jacket off, but it’s a suspicion.

Read More
957 Words | 4 Pages

The day after the murder OJ Simpson had fresh cuts on his body (http://law2.umkc.edu/facility/porjects/ftrials/simspon/evidence.html). OJ Simpson acted really weird when the police called him to inform him about Nicole Brown’s death (http://law2.umkc.edu/facility/porjects/ftrials/simspon/evidence.html). Simpson tried and blamed another guy, which was his friend, named Charlie (http://law2.umkc.edu/facility/porjects/ftrials/Simpson/Simpson.htm). Investigators should have found more evidence at the crime scene, because everyone knew that OJ Simpson did kill his wife and her friend, Ronald

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

When Sarah stated “There was nothing linking him to the crime, no DNA, no fibers, no hairs, no matching soil from the bottom of his boots' (Koenig, Ep 1) It shows how hard the detectives looked for physical proof but found nothing. There was also no video footage or any accommodating witnesses. This doesn’t sit right with me because the state relied solely on Jay's statement which shouldnt be the only evidence to lock someone up, especially in a murder case. Going to jail on the charges and consequences for homicide can ruin a possibly innocent person's life, they should be innocent until proven guilty, and the state needs to be more cautious when sentencing people.

Read More
1360 Words | 6 Pages

Some of these reasons have left people conflicted on who really killed Brown and how they got away. Multiple of these theories will be explained below. O. J. Simpson: O.J. Simpson was the ex-husband of Nicole Brown Simpson. Simpson had a history of violence against Brown while the two were together. He was reportedly obsessive and controlling over her.

Read More
469 Words | 2 Pages

The transcripts from this phone call shows yelling and Brown explaining that Simpson had broken into her home by kicking the back door down. As a result, the couple divorced in 1990. During Nicole's final night she and her family, including O.J., attended their daughters recital. After the show, her and her family went out to dinner, making it clear they did not want O.J. to attend.. This was upsetting to Simpson because it showed another way Nicole was moving on without him after their divorce.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

OJ Simpson was a very achieved person player until he made one big mistake. The trial of OJ Simpson was a long stressful process to prove a star innocent or guilty of murder. This took Place in the state of California on October 3, 1995. OJ was tried for a murder crime of his ex-wife and another man. In the end OJ turned out to be not guilty of this crime.

Read More
151 Words | 1 Pages

In the OJ Simpson’s trial, police made a few mistakes in the investigation process. They did not protect the crime scene well, did not follow the legislation requirements, ignore important evidence, and did not secure evidence. These are the main factors possibly affect the case outcome. To prevent the future mistakes, the head police officer must give the right direction for initial response to the crime scene. This includes crime scene preservation and securing evidence.

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

There was multiply evidence that, traced back to O.J. Simpson. His blood was recovered and fingerprints were local on the back fence. Later they found his hair in a knit hat at the crime scene, which the same kind of fiber was found on Goldman’s clothing. Fibers from simpson’s car were also similar to the knit hat. In his vehicle, he had blood from both victims and a pair of bloody socks in his house, along with the right glove that was missing from the crime scene.

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

The O.J. Simpson case was a different one because he was a celebrity. The celebrity status made all the difference in the case, as most people had diverse views on the case. As a famous individual, the media also had the chance to broadcast the trial and give differences of opinion on the case. The celebrity status had a significant influence in the O.J. Simpson case as the public had to struggle with an image he had created for many years. People knew O.J. Simpson as a footballer and an actor with a charming character impossible to hurt anyone.

Read More
1610 Words | 7 Pages

OJ Simpson is Indeed Innocent “If it doesn’t fit, you have to acquit,” this quote said by one of OJ Simpson’s attorneys, Johnny Cochran, is widely known for its impact on the controversial case of OJ Simpson. From 1994-1995 OJ Simpson was known as one of the most controversial cases in the USA due to the verdict that OJ was innocent of the murders of his ex wife and one of her friends. On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman met an untimely demise, and the only suspect the police ever reviewed was OJ Simpson. OJ was later caught in a low speed chase in a white Ford Bronco before being taken into custody and put on trial. In the sensationally controversial court case involving OJ Simpson as a suspect for murder, The innocent ruling

Read More
1219 Words | 5 Pages

Unfortunately, the defense flipped the trial into a race-related trial claiming the police were corrupt and the major mistake was allowing O.J. to try on the blood-soaked glove where the famous line “if the glove doesn’t fit, you must acquit.” O.J. Simpson was acquitted of the

Read More

More about How Did Oj Simpson Commited The Crime

Related Topics

Open Document