How Did Richard III Removed From Sanctuary

Richard III had several opportunities to murder his nephews Edward V and Richard, Duke of York. The two most well known opportunities are when Richard III removed Prince Richard from sanctuary, and when Richard III hired Tyrell to murder Edward V and Richard, Duke of York, in the Tower of London. The topic of Richard III’s opportunities to commit murder helps to convict Richard III, because it demonstrates how many chances he had to murder his nephews. The following explains the reasons why Richard III removed Prince Richard from sanctuary. Richard III wanted Richard, Duke of York, removed from sanctuary so he would have both Edward V and Prince Richard under his control. The reason Richard III wanted both of his nephews under his control

The defense will argue that Richard did not plan to usurp the throne or kill his nephews, and the only reason he wanted Prince Richard removed from sanctuary was to give Edward V a companion his age. They will also argue that sanctuary is no place for a child, but all that does is bring the two princes together where Richard III would have a better chance to kill them, and take the throne. The defense’s claim that Richard III believed the brothers should be together fails to consider the fact that before Edward IV died, Edward V was in Wales and Prince Richard was in London. The two brothers were probably used to being apart, and there would have been no reason to bring them together. Edward V was probably used to being on his own or around people older than him. As a future king, Edward V did not have much time to play. He had to prepare for his coronation and learn how to rule the country. Edward’s tutors knew that they had much to teach him and so they prepared him as much as possible. These preparations took up most of Edward’s day leaving him no time to play. While Prince Richard is in sanctuary, Richard III argues that he does not need to be there because the council can protect Prince Richard. Sanctuary is a place for people, in need of protection, to stay. Even though Prince

The defense will argue that it is likely that the confession never happened, and More made it up because the confession was never recorded. The defense will also mention that More used intimate details that he could not have known, like how Tyrell was suspected for the murder. If Tyrell buried the princes at the foot of the stairs only to have the bodies moved, people would have heard the noise of digging at midnight. As it turns out, no witness is ever mentioned. Seeing as the confession comes from Tyrell, the man who allegedly murdered the princes, More would have no reason to lie about the confession. While there is no record of Tyrell’s confession today, one must have existed because More claims to have used it as a source. Also, Henry VII divulged the contents of Tyrell’s confession to his trusted advisors. More also obtained some of his information from John Dighton who would have known intimate details of the murder. After the murder happened, rumors arose saying that the princes were murdered. Where would these rumors have come from if there were no witnesses? In regards to the actual murder of the princes, why would Richard III order Brackenbury to hand over the keys to the tower if his intention was not to have Tyrell kill Edward V and Prince