Time on the cross was written to straighten out the economics that followed slavery. Robert William Fogel and Stanley L. Engerman aimed to demolish views that Black Americans “don’t have culture achievements and the development that taken part the first few years after coming on American soil”(p.258). In time on the cross it summarized as slavery being unprofitable, it was something economic and more. Overall slavery was the extremely harsh environment for a typical slave.
Over the years, slavery has grown from the high mark of the Roman empire. About twenty-one million people lived in bondage. The Roman Empire had a huge impact on the Antebellum era. But in the middle ages of Europe slavery was never really fully (eradicated). Almost everyone
…show more content…
Agriculture production based on slave labor was inefficient but more efficient than farming families. Free white man’s work was never as productive as a slave field hand. The value of slaves weren’t so profitable unless the land that they were on was new and highly fertile. Slavery caused the economy of the South to deteriorate on the economic growth during the time before the Civil War. Slavery was never really an irrational type of system. It was more as if things were profitable the prices of slaves were judged by what was earned. Even though slavery in certain areas was flourishing slavery was not incompatible to industrial …show more content…
The conditions of a slave and a free black worker were compared frequently. Men were the most valuable; they were strong and get work done faster. Men who worked the slave field hand was not lazy. Matter of fact they were more hard working than his white counterpart. From my understanding, the work of a man was quicker and done at a certain pace due to their strengths. The distribution of slave males grew from the eighteen-fifties to the 1870’s. Part of slave incomes they worked hard for was expropriated by their owner. Even though this was true it wasn’t a high percentage that was generally assumed. During his lifetime on the slave field, he would receive 90 percent of his income. Some men would even buy their freedom then work on freeing their whole family. Of course, with slavery, not everyone stood by the fact of having slavery. Due to the differences of the Northern and Southerners it caused an uprise between the two. Southerners wanted everyone to abide by slavery and northern didn’t want to. By the 1850’s it became a political movement, businesses small farmer and religious people joined. Even though all those individuals joined woman basically lead in convincing people slavery is wrong. Women played a huge role in this. Women turned Americans against