1. The name of the government policy that led to civil disobedience in India is “British Salt tax” 2. In my view, Indian society did benefit from the civil disobedience, as it united thousands of citizens to join and later on was a trigger for the declaration of independence by the Indian National Congress. 3. The British government policy affected Indians society in a way were citizens could not collect their own salt at the coast of India as it became illegal and had to buy salt they could not really afford. 1. The policy that led to the protest in London in 2009 was the G20 Summit policy that ranged from anger at the banking system, bankers’ salary and concerns over economic policy. 2. In my opinion the protesters did not benefit from the demonstration that happened in London, as numerous injuries occurred …show more content…
The impact of government policy on the public services during the demonstration did not give the police officers a choice. As some of the demonstrators were acting in a very bad manner arrests had to be made. However, during the demonstrations there was reported a lot of unnecessary use of force from the police and a lot of people got injured. 1. The section 188 of policy of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act of 1992 was the cause of the fire fighters strike in London on 1st of November, 2010. 2. I think the strikers benefit from this strike in London, as they are showing that they will not put up with this kind of a decision when there is clearly section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act of 1992 that disproves it. 3. The fire fighters were affected by receiving a threat of being sacked if new contracts are not signed. That meant that some stations would be closed down and people would get redundant. All of this will automatically decrease the work effectiveness of the fire service in the neighbourhood. 1. The Racial segregation in the world eventually led to the sit-in in Greensboro in the