ipl-logo

How Did The Central Government Created When The Articles Of Confederation Were Not Working Well

807 Words4 Pages

Week 6 Review Questions 1. How did the limited central government created by the Articles of Confederation reflect the issues behind the Revolution and fears for individual liberties? The limited central government represented more of a peace treaty between that states than a blueprint for a powerful nation. It was created to maintain national coordination during the Revolution, but not much more; The States still held most of the power. The only powers the national government held were those essential to the Revolution such as declaring war, conducting foreign affairs, and making treaties with other governments (Foner 249). This weakness stemmed from the public fear of a tyrannical government that would hold too much power over it’s citizenry, …show more content…

What events and ideas led to the belief in 1786 and 1787 that the Articles of Confederation were not working well? Shay’s Rebellion and the actions of State legislatures opened the door for feelings that the Articles of Confederation were not working. Acting in what they claimed to be the spirit of the Revolution, citizens rose up in protest of the government that could not do enough to protect its citizens interests. People were facing debt and losing their land, not able to make a proper living or pay taxes. Fears arose over the abuse of liberty and unchecked power of the people (255). Because of this it was decided that the national government must be strengthened in order to develop uniform economic policies and protect property owners from infringements on their rights by local majorities …show more content…

What were the major arguments in support of the Constitution given by the Federalists? The Federalist’s major arguments were that the checks and balances put in place would maintain a strong government while also protecting it from becoming tyrannical. Hamilton claimed that it would be “the perfect balance between liberty and power (263).” Madison claimed that the Constitution was structured to prevent abuses of authority (264). He also claimed that it was in place to protect public rights and protect the public from conducting dangerous activities. He claimed that it would create a coalition of minorities while never letting one control the

Show More
Related
1159 Words | 5 Pages

DBQ Essay The United States Constitution is a document that or founding fathers made in order to replace the failing Articles of Confederation (A of C). Under the Constitution, the current government and states don’t have the problems they faced when the A of C was in action. The Constitution was created in 1788, and held an idea that the whole nation was nervous about. This idea was a strong national government, and the Federalist assured the people that this new government would work. The framers of the Constitution decided to give more power to the Federal government rather than the state governments because the A of C had many problems, there was a need for the layout of new government, rights, and laws, and there was a need for the Federal

Read More
841 Words | 4 Pages

After the outbreak of the Revolutionary War, thirteen American colonies desired a government to displace and overturn the rule of British. So, they attempted to establish a governance of the Article of Confederation. As the first written constitution of the United States, the Articles of Confederation was not faultless. The Articles formed a weak central government and a loose confederation of sovereign states, leaving most of the power and independence with the state governments. Although the document gave Congress authority to make treaties, coin money and maintain army force, the central government still lacked of ability to implement these rules (Foner, 1991).

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

1. How did the limited central government created by the Articles of Confederation reflect the issues behind the Revolution and fears for individual liberties? The people of the still ¨virgin¨ United States of America, this also including congress, and other heads of state, all were reluctant to give more power to any one branch of government, out of fear that this branch would unjustly restrict freedoms of those meant to be free. They also had fears that they had fought for freedom only to allow a dictatorial regime to rise within the nation and oppress the people.

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

After the American Revolution, the colonies needed to reconstruct a new, fresh government. America, however, was extremely restrictive with giving the central government any forms of power after the hardships the colonies faced being under the British government and Parliament. The colonies did not want to undergo another period of unfair taxation and regulated systems. Thus, America’s first government, The Articles of Confederation, gave the central government immensely few granted powers. After an eight year period, the majority of America knew that they needed a new form of government.

Read More
1210 Words | 5 Pages

The Anti Federalists didn’t want what we have now,they didn’t want the federal government to have and influence over citizens’ lives, they didn’t want the govt to in any way resemble a monarchy because they had just escaped from the corrupt monarchy. They believed that if the power in the country occupied in the people of the various states, then their vision would have a chance of success. Likewise, the Anti Federalist thought there was no bill of rights, so they disliked the constitution. Every constitution should have one for the people, and the government shouldn’t refuse to give on, as shown on Document E. The Letter to James Madison, Objections to the Constitution was written by Thomas Jefferson to explain what he disliked about the constitution to one of the writings, after the constitution was drafted and were awaiting ratification. Thomas Jefferson also asserts that he doesn’t like the fact that there is no rules and regulations in regard to office terms, and how the officers could get re-elected and serve for like, thus, will result with corruption

Read More
354 Words | 2 Pages

A convention based out of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on May 25, 1787 was called for the purpose of amending the Articles of Confederation. Confident to construct a new government from the ground up. Wouldn’t have been possible without the aid of the fifty-five delegates. The delegates pushed though despite their differences in opinions. Outlining our new government took well over a quarter of the year.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

Eventually, the Articles of Confederation was reform to today’s the Constitution. Since those heavy taxes imposed by the British government created the revolutionary turmoil, the new nation decided to limit the overall control power of the central government, especially

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

“The accumulation of all powers..in the same hands, whether of one or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, 1788) ( Background Essay) This quote explains the reasoning for one of the framers, (B) Separation of Powers. The framers of the constitution were created to prevent tyranny and create a stronger government that would hold the nation together. Tyranny ultimately means harsh, absolute power in the hands of one individual-- like a king or dictator. The constitution guarded against tyranny in 4 ways: (A)Federalism, (B)Separation of Powers, (C)Checks & Balances, and (D)Small State-Large State.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The Articles of the Confederation was the first government constitution that the United States used, and, although there were strength like the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, there were major weaknesses of the Articles of the Confederation like the following: requiring 9 out of the 13 colonial votes from the representatives from different states to pass a law; having no executive and judicial branch; and the federal government being unable to impose tax revenue onto the states. Such flaws would eventually lead to the Constitution and the repeal of the articles, for the Constitution was a measure to fix the problems of the articles with a stronger government that allowed them to impose taxes and and implement new laws for a more effective government.

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

2. The central government was designed to be very, very weak. The Articles established “the United States of America” as a perpetual union formed to defend the states as a group, but it provided few central powers beyond that. But it didn’t have an executive official or judicial

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

By writing a new constitution, the farmers were able to address the problems which the nation faced under the Articles of Confederation. The most important issues were addressed by the establishment of a stronger national government that was selected by the citizens. Unlike the Articles of Confederation, were each state maintain its own sovereign rule, each state was represented equally in Congress through the representatives elected by its citizen. Therefore, power was no longer placed in a single institution such as the states or one overall governing body, but rather in the hands of the people. This government had the power to tax, regulate trade and commerce, and coin a national currency with a majority vote versus a unanimous vote.

Read More
932 Words | 4 Pages

This document (the Federalist) will provide all the reasons to support the new plan of government described in the U.S. Constitution, and responses to each of the criticisms of the plan. Opponents to the new plan criticize it most on it creating a strong central government that will be abusive to individual liberty. However, an energetic government is crucial to the protection of individual liberty. The plan of government under the Articles of Confederation was unable to effectively protect individual liberties because it did not act directly upon the people, and had no authority to enforce its laws.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

The Federalists wrote pieces of propaganda that explained why they supported the Constitution. Monroe and Kersh (2016) stated that “Federalist no. 10 argues, surprisingly, that a large national government can protect liberty more effectively than small local governments,” (p.70). The Federalists supported a large national government because if small locals governments had more control, according to Monroe and Kersh (2016), “ … factions - groups that pursue their self- interest at the expense of others,” would form (p. 70). If factions were created, a single group would have more control because they would want to benefit themselves. Moreover, Monroe and Kersh (2016) claimed that, “ in Federalist no. 51, ‘if men were angels, no government would be necessary.’

Read More
1689 Words | 7 Pages

The national government helps bring us all together to make decisions. Federalism gives every level of government their own control over certain aspects of our government. It allows different states with different needs to have laws suited for their people, while still giving us the strong central government that we need. Federalism gives the people more opportunities to meet with leaders and to get more involved in the government. We need a strong central government because they give us protection.

Read More

More about How Did The Central Government Created When The Articles Of Confederation Were Not Working Well

Related Topics

Open Document