How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny

455 Words2 Pages

How would it feel to be ruled by a dictator or king instead of free? Probably like you’re a slave to a king.Tyranny is a single person or group that has all of the power. The constitutional convention took place in Philadelphia 1787. Delegates from twelve of thirteen states showed up the Convention to revise the Articles of Confederation and write what is now the Constitution. How did the Constitution guard against one person or group having all the power? The constitution guarded against tyranny in two ways, the separation of powers in our government and the system of checks and balances. One way the constitution protected against tyranny is the separation of power. The separation of power in our government is power split up into three branches. The power between the branches is absolutely equal the three branches are the Legislative, Executive and Judicial branch. In the Federalist Papers #47 James Madison states, “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very …show more content…

The system of checks and balances allows each branch of government (Legislative, Executive & Judicial) to check each other to see if their actions are constitutional (follows the constitution) and if the actions are not constitutional they can balance out that power again. “... The constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner that they may be a check on the other…” James Madison states in the Federalist Papers article #51. This means when the branches ane divided one may check the other. One way the branches can check each other is the executive branch can veto a law the legislative branch sends. That is a check. The system of checks and balances guards against tyranny because each branch checks each