ipl-logo

How Did The Federal Government Promote Vital Movement

1055 Words5 Pages

The Federal Government and Promoting Vital Movements Various social movements from the 1940s to the 1980s gained a great amount of recognition influenced by the extensive control of the federal government. Although they had different views on how the government should be organized, the Civil Rights Movement and the New Right Movement were deeply affected by the expansion of government power. The Civil Rights Movement largely supported the ideal of government involvement and protection to achieve its goals of equality and justice. In contrast, the New Right Movement believed government involvement should be limited and advocated for traditional conservative values. The federal government played a vital role in determining the lasting impact …show more content…

In 1954, the Supreme Court case ‘Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka’ declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional, therefore rejecting the ideals of ‘separate but equal’ (Lecture 17). It was a significant victory for the Civil Rights Movement and would continue to improve their everyday lives. This established law allowed for better treatment of African Americans and showed the importance of the federal government’s power in challenging and dismantling the once-established segregated racism in the United States. Similarly, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were also significant legislations made following the Civil Rights Movement. These laws were initiated by the federal government and aimed to further end segregation in public places like schools, transportation, and businesses. The Montgomery Bus System in 1955 is an example that helped further advance the battle for the Civil Rights …show more content…

The movement’s support for these policies was a reaction to the social turmoil of the 1960s and 1970s, including urban riots like the ‘March on Washington’ and the counterculture movement like those in the ‘Black Power Movement’ (LEP 816). By advocating for Law and Order principles, the New Right Movement aimed to restore stability and traditional values in the United States. This made the federal government take an assertive role in maintaining public order by allowing the state and local levels of government to take control. While the New Right and the Civil Rights Movement had different approaches to government power, both were influenced by the social and political changes that took place from the 1940s to the 1980s. The Civil Rights Movement supported the expansion of the federal government’s involvement in social issues, as seen in the New Deal and the Great Society programs. Meanwhile, the New Right Movement's resistance to this affirmative change reflected a backlash against government intervention and a desire for a more limited

Show More
Related
1558 Words | 7 Pages

For example, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 came forth because of several movements like the Gay Rights Movement, Feminist Movement, and the Civil Rights Movement. These movements caused a lot of turbulence in the country because while one group thought we were moving forward, another group thought we were moving back. This caused chaos in the country, leading to backlash from our own government who should be for the people. Out of all the movements from the 1960s and 70s though, the Black Panther Party had the harshest response from the government. The Black Panther movement came up after the assassination of Malcolm X to fight against police brutality and defend the African American community in West Oakland, California.

Read More
1131 Words | 5 Pages

The Civil Rights Movement is known as a 1950s-1970s era but has been ongoing throughout the history of the United States. The Movement started once the first African-American slaves rebelled against their owners. These crusades continue as all groups fight for equal rights. However, without one particular group, the Civil Rights Movement would be an unjust battle for American liberties. The Supreme Court is the most powerful entity in the Civil Rights Movement with the national authority of the Constitution, for the Court had the necessary power to spare and the state governments were overshadowed by the federal government.

Read More
131 Words | 1 Pages

From the mid-60s and until the 70s, more liberal new laws were passed than any other period since FDR’s liberalism wave. However, liberalism was under attack from two directions. In one hand, civil rights activists were impatient and unsatisfied with civil rights progress. These young activists were not only disapproving the “slow” civil right progress or the war in Vietnam, but they were also refusing anything linked in the cold war liberalism.

Read More
617 Words | 3 Pages

From the previous century, the United States built rapidly regardless of their obstacles that went through their way. The conflict throughout Civil Rights was described as a battle, and was a sense of pure racism, a concept that was viewed as not important to some Americans. Many groups wanted to change America’s perspective of discrimination, human rights, and freedom. However during the 1960s, people who seeked for rights, damaged America with protests and riots that were intended to make America an equal nation. There were people in the United States that were in need of change, hoping for the country ro be ‘free’ as it should be in society.

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

One of the two most prominent fights for civil rights for specific communities in the 20th century in the United States were the Women's Suffrage Movement and the Civil Rights Movement. The Women’s Suffrage Movement advocated for the right to vote for women living in the United States of America. The Civil Rights movement faced the systematic suppression and oppression of African-Americans and utilized various different techniques of non-violent in order to overcome the system set against them. While there are many similarities and differences of both movements that were instrumental in the correct way to fight oppression, both utilized non-violent intentions and techniques to overcome their obstacles.

Read More
1494 Words | 6 Pages

There was a time in which the minorities within America began to emerge up from the trench of inequality and injustice, and that is when the civil rights movements came in existence. The sole purpose for these protest movements was to restore their basic rights as U.S citizen, getting recognized as equal under the eyes of law. However, in spite of enactments of many civil right laws, using various tactics and strategies and substantial amount of toil and struggle, not all of those movements were successful in achieving their aims. Only few movements were able to acquire their objectives. Starting off from first most significant movement of the 90s, the civil rights movement of African Americans, outnumbering other minorities in America.

Read More
940 Words | 4 Pages

Although the roots of this movement date as far back as the 1900s, the legacy of the African American’s role in World War II sparked the catalyst needed to promote the legislation that eventually led to their equality. “On May 17, 1954, The Supreme Court announced its decision in the case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka” (Brinkley 772). This regulation overturned the Supreme Court’s earlier decision in the Plessy V Ferguson case. The separate but equal doctrine was a prime example of domestic policy that did not uphold the government’s constitutional promise to promote the general welfare of society-to include all that fall under the definition of an American citizen. The affliction put on children who had to travel to segregated public schools placed an unequal burden and damage done to those who it pertained to.

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

In the history of the United States, few Supreme Court cases have had such a profound impact on society as Brown v. Board of Education. This landmark case, decided in 1954, struck down the doctrine of “separate but equal” in public education, paving the way for desegregation and marking a significant victory in the fight for civil rights. To fully understand the implications and significance of the Brown case, it is essential to delve into the historical context, legal arguments, and aftermath of this pivotal decision. Historical Context To appreciate the importance of Brown v. Board of Education, one must first understand the prevailing racial attitudes and policies in the United States leading up to the case.

Read More
341 Words | 2 Pages

The reformation of civil rights and societal norms during the mid-twentieth century was a monumental moment in American history. From racial desegregation, to women breaking away from a male dominate society; they all have contributed to the liberalism and diversity of present day America.

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

On May 17th, 1954, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decided that segregation in public schools violated the 14th amendment. Therefore Brown v. Board of Education was the earliest major event to occur in the Civil Rights Movement. As a consequence, the Supreme Court’s historic decision boosted the morale of civil rights activists across the country (especially in the South) and motivated them to do more about racial inequality in America.

Read More
583 Words | 3 Pages

The civil rights movement from 1945 to 1980 was a complex and multifaceted struggle for equality, in which both civil rights activists and government officials played central but distinct roles. While civil rights activists mobilized communities and raised awareness of the need for change, government officials worked to remove legal barriers and pass laws protecting civil rights. These additional efforts led to significant advances in the fight for equality, including the Montgomery Bus boycott, Brown v. Department of Education and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. For example, the Montgomery bus boycott was

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

During the civil rights movement from 1945-1968, activists and the federal government took the action they thought to be most effective to reach their specific goals. Many activists took the ways of protests, like boycotting public transportation, to show their dissatisfaction with the current laws and regulations in place. The federal government often times relied on the passage of laws, including the Civil Rights act of 1964, to end segregation. The use of politics to express the concerns of both parties was a way for the government and the people to work together. The civil rights movement brought challenges that were faced by activists, and the federal government through the seperate ways of protesting and the passage of laws, along with

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

The federalists believed in having a strong national government with supreme power over state governments. They also argued that if they were to give too much power to the states, it would no doubt create a government with not enough power to act. They believed this was great movement that would protect the people's rights from the Bill of Rights, government, and the

Read More
1075 Words | 5 Pages

The New Right movement began in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s because of Barry Goldwater. He encouraged a hands-off government. The public was skeptical at first, but a movement that supported his ideals was soon created. Members of the New Right movement were mostly white, middle class, Christians with a family and steady job. The New Right is broken into Religious Fundamentalism, Political Fundamentalism, and Conspiracy Theory.

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

The social movement's remarkable nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience campaigns eventually led to new federal legal protections for the civil rights of all Americans. Political theory is the study of the values and ideologies

Read More

More about How Did The Federal Government Promote Vital Movement

Open Document