Writing an argument is something all strong writers know how to do. By learning from other peoples mistakes and the different types of methods writers become more persuasive in their arguments. The Toulmin method is one way to analyze an argument. Stephen Toulmin created this method to better understand and examine the pieces of an argument in order to decide the effectiveness of it. In the article “The Locavore Myth: Why Buying from Nearby Farmers Won’t Save the Planet”, James E. McWilliams argues that although the locavore movement has brought attention to industrialized food, the movement still does not prevent the damage that is being done to the earth.
Today’s consumers no longer consider where the food is coming from nor do they understand what it takes to prepare soil, grow food, and its logistic all the way to consumption. Some of his audience may understand the logistic or chain of events from soil to consumption, yet choose otherwise. Berry said: “Many people are now as much estranged from the lives of domestic plants and animals (except for flowers and dogs and cats) as they are from the lives of the wild ones”.
The Locavore Myth Analysis Developing and expressing an argument effectively takes skill. Successfully developing and expressing an argument takes
“Thou shouldst eat to live; not live to eat”, is a famous quote by the well known philosopher Socrates, who believed this is the perspective we should take when we are eating food. Unfortunately, the times have changed and so has the way we eat. We no longer have to go hunting for our food, or grow crops to receive all of our fruits and vegetables. Because we have become a society that has grown into the new world of technology, there would be no need to rely on ourselves for what we need-- we can simply gather our resources from other people. In the book, “The Omnivore’s Dilemma”, written by Michael Pollan, takes us on a journey full of concerns of the “Food Industrial Complex”.
The people in the community can change their views of themself and their community according to the quote, “But supermarkets can provide more than just improved food access and economic growth—new investments can change how residents see themselves and their communities (page 109). This quote proves benefits of improving food issues go far beyond food into people's
These eaters ignore the politics concerning food rather looking for esthetics and quick service. Due to these disregarding’s, the industrial eaters won’t ever realize that eating responsibly is a way “to live free” (2). Berry then lists off seven points regarding how to eat more responsibly for the passive consumers. These points range from “[participating] in food production to the extent that you can” to “[learning] as much as you can, by direct observation and experience if possible, of the life histories of the food species” (Berry 4-5). Berry also believes that it’s important for the animals that meat comes from to have lived a pleasant life.
James E. McWilliams takes the opportunity to plead his case against the popular belief that buying food locally can help save the planet in “The Locavore Myth: Why Buying Form Nearby Farmers Won’t Save the Planet” (McWilliams 89). McWilliams finds it necessary to point out that the popular slogan “Buy local, shrink the distance food travels, save the planet” covers the problems with industrialized foods in regards to transportation in his beginning statements. He then follows up by making the bold statement that “a lot of them are making a big mistake” (89). They fail to see that there are other “energy-hogging factors” (89).
Locavores are misinformed idealist who believe in changing the world by eating locally. They believe by eating locally, they are improving their carbon footprint, help the local economy, and creating a more nutritional diet. However, locavores are ignorant of many situations such as many people’s lives depend on trade and that many places are not suitable for farming. Even though a locavore’s heart is heading in the right direction, but their efforts are misguided.
Not only are these farms building blocks, but these local farms help with environmental contamination, rural economics, and exploited, immigrant work force. Local farms also bring a community together through local food as well as community health. Having fresh produce helps prevent diet-related diseases, which is a very important issue in America today. Through local food, people bond with their community as well as their food; for instance, knowing and understanding how the food is produced and accessed allows people to be more aware of their community and health. However, not all communities today have this way of thinking, many communities suffer from food deserts, when supermarkets and alike leave an area.
The author of the Locavore’s Dilemma is Christophe Pelletier, who focuses on the difficulties and possibilities of the life of Locavore. His propose is to ask the locavores to think critically about the model of food and farming and heighten people’s cognition of locavores. The second to fourth paragraphs talked about the feasibility of just eating 100-mile food. The author said that people could not leave coffee, beers, and other food and denied the possibility of getting these food for some reasons.
In Freedman’s article, Freedman basically stated that it is not about whipping out the whole fast food industries, but rather to make a healthy change by reducing the ingredients like the fat and carbs, but keeping the same ideal taste in the products. He claims that with the right tools we are able to make processed food much healthier but with the same taste. Freedman reasons that fast food industries are aware of the obesity epidemic, and are making silent and gradual health changes to their menus. Freedman’s biggest argument against the wholesome food movement is that the most average American struggle to make the huge jump from fat greasy food to organic food. Like from hamburgers to natural apples.
This is due to the fact that food deserts are located in these areas of low income and businesses do not choose to open in these neighborhoods because they are not likely to prosper in them. In order to try to fix this issue, cities have tried to place healthier options like Whole Foods in these neighborhoods but they are having an adverse effect. The individuals of the community cannot afford to pay more for better quality food and end up shutting down. One possible way to fix this issue is to open more cost friendly options like Aldi or Safeway. By adding a greater variety of options at a lower costs, citizens should be able to make the shift to more healthier options without breaking their
On each side of the locavore debate, there are positives and negatives about whether this is truly a movement that is helpful to both the economy and the earth itself. Although the mere idea of the movement is honorable, in the grand scheme of the issues at
The Locavore Movement Increasing levels of greenhouse gases produced by fuel of trucks and animal production has caused a major impact in pollution and climate change. Also, in the U.S. there is a bad nutrition outbreak due to not eating enough fresh foods with the right nutrients. There is a movement taking place is aimed to solve this problem but will it actually work?
Vegetarians consume less animal fats and cholesterol and replaces it with more antioxidants and fibers. If more people decided to become vegetarians it would not only improve people’s health but also the environment and the economy. Taking America as an example, the statistics show that nearly 70% of America 's adults are suffering from obesity and one of the consequences of this is getting a heart disease meaning that you most likely have high blood pressure and high cholesterol. This is usually because the typical american diet is not very healthy because of the amount of bad fats and fast food they are consuming. If an american were to change to a vegetarian diet, the majority of the bad fats will be eliminated and replaced by foods that are
