Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Australian aboriginal rights
Australian aboriginal rights
The fight for Aboriginal LAnd Rights in Australia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Australian aboriginal rights
Australian aboriginal rights
The fight for Aboriginal LAnd Rights in Australia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
After 10 long years Torres Strait Islander Eddie ‘Koiki’ Mabo has lead indigenous Australians to a victory over the Queensland government. This win this case is a historical moment, as of yesterday, the indigenous Australians have been recognised as the owners of Murray Island. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders are known to have resided in Australia, 40,000 to 60,000 years before the British arrived in 1788. When the British took over they decided to take all the land for themselves even though the indigenous Australians were here first. This court case recognises indigenous Australians unique connection to the land and acknowledges that they have the rights to the land.
* Disclaimer, many of the exact numbers and dates were different across sites so the most common dates and numbers were used. In June 1838, and the following months later that year, the Aboriginal culture and Australia was severely impacted in many ways because of the Myall Creek Massacre. This was an incident that approximately twenty-eight men, women and children of Aboriginal culture were violently slaughtered for no reason but to kill.
How did WW1 impact on those who remained in Australia? World War 1 was the First World War. Men from all over the world fought for the country we live in today in this society. For the people who had fought for this country are remembered as the heroes of today. WW1 was a tough time for troops and families.
The Mabo decision of the high court in 1992 is vastly significant as it marks history as the victory of indigenous Australian land rights against the federal government, who had colonised their land and refused to acknowledge that Australia was originally owned by the ATSI people but became a terra nullius land due to the European colonists. The events that have occurred before 1992 such as the The Aboriginal Land Rights Act (NT) of 1976 and the bark petition is deemed less significant than the Mabo decision. I firmly believe that the Mabo case is an extraordinary achievement. it started in 1982 when Eddie Mabo brought up a case against the supreme court of Queensland that Indigenous Australians should have land rights. After almost a whole
The Mabo Decision was the turning point for the recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander rights. Firstly, the Mabo Decision was significant because the decision was the lead up to the recognition of Aboriginal Rights. The Mabo Decision was the movement that made everyone fully recognise the Aboriginal people as humans, and official citizens of the country. The Decision also raised awareness to the discrimination the Aboriginal people were facing before the referendum.
Psychological awareness and an indication of an inner life is central to a portrait – with certain techniques, an artist can represent the emotions and personality of the sitter as well as showing the effect and influence they had on people. Using symbolic colours, styles and depths, Gordon Bennett and Andrew Mezei are successfully able to characterize the inner life of their subjects. Gordon Bennett’s “Eddie Mabo” is a portrait of Koiki (Eddie) Mabo, a Torres Strait Islander responsible for initiating a legal case for native rights against the State of Queensland in 1982. In 1992, Mabo’s case was approved, and it was decided that the Mer people (from Murray Island) were the traditional owners of the land, four months after Mabo died of cancer.
World War 1 impacted Australian society greatly. This event did change society forever. Women were seen differently as their role in society changed. It brought along the idea of conscription and propaganda to influence the civilian population. Women had to adapt to new lifestyles during World War 1 as the death toll of Australian troops just kept decreasing.
Commencing in the terminating stages of 1941 was the Pacific war. A war which can now be considered not solely a pivotal moment for many nations in the world but also one of high significance for Australia too. Due to the traumatic occurrences throughout the Pacific War Australia was ultimately transformed into a nation which possessed equally more strength and confidence all of which blossomed from victories as well as new allies. However, the Pacific War also birthed and manifested a more immature and racist nation.
Good morning Ms Eagle and 10B. World War 2 started during 1939 and continued to 1945. These 6 years consisted of bloody battles and brought terrible trauma. This multimodal presentation will discuss the impact World War 2 had on the Australian citizens living and working in Australia during the war. My hypothesis for this topic is that the war changed Australians lives severely. I believe their lives during the time of the war would have been very hard, constantly living in fear of what was to come.
Australia was involved in Both World War I and World War II, which occurred from 1939-1945 including the Holocaust. The Holocaust was caused by the Nazis which included the deaths of 6 Million Jews, The Holocaust was led by a man Named Adolf Hitler, Leader of the Third Reich (Nazi Germany). Hitler Youth is a corporation led by Hitler and its main purpose is to implant all the bad things about the Jewish. Not Only was the Holocaust a big fiasco that happened in World War II, but there was also the atomic bomb that was launched on Hiroshima, Nagasaki.
Historically, immigration plays a major role in Australia. The White Australia Policy (WAP), played a significant role in shaping Australia in the twentieth century. The White Australia Policy describes Australia 's approach to immigration, from federation until the late twentieth century. The policy wasn 't completely removed until 1973, it took the Australian Government 25 years to dismantle it. People thought the policy was necessary for many reasons; such as racism, fear of invasion and concern that the standard of living would decline if people from other cultures were allowed into Australia.
The First World War or Great War (1914-1918) was a time of bloody conflict between nations. The impact on Australia; the land and its people was far-reaching. Lives were lost and damaged which caused the course of history in Australia to change forever. It is ignorant to assert that 1918 was solely a victory to Australia, as every individual was affected to a different degree. The year 1918 could be considered victory for Australia and its people to some extent, as During the theatre of the First World War, the Australian soldier began to be recognised for many admirable characteristics that were uncommon to other nations.
The Fall of Saigon refers to when the Northern Vietnamese forces invaded Saigon (modern-day Ho Chi Minh City), the capital of South Vietnam and the home of the presidential palace. On that day, South Vietnam surrendered to the communist North, signalling the end of the Vietnam War in April 30, 1975. The Fall of Saigon was a significant event that affected the South Vietnamese people socially as it forced them to flee to another country and to adapt to that country’s culture. This meant there was an increase in refugees and many fled to Australia because it was closer than USA. The Fall of Saigon not only affected Vietnam but Australia as well.
The Bringing Them Home Report was a significant event for the civil rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Discuss. The Bringing Them Home Report had a significant impact on the civil rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders.
Mabo: The Mabo case was a judgment in the High Court of Australia in 1992 affirming that Aboriginal people could still have rights to land taken by settlers. Wik: The Wik decision was a legal judgment made in Australia in 1996 that protects the right of Aboriginal people to own land. However, it stated that Native Title could co-exist with other rights on land under pastoral lease but, if there is a conflict between Native Title and lease, the rights of the leaseholder will