ipl-logo

How Did The Scientific Revolution Affect The Enlightenment In Europe

1556 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Galilee galileo in the renaissance and scientific revolution

The Scientific revolution changed the way people thought and their perception of the world,this eventually led to the Enlightenment in europe,after this the ideas of the enlightenment were spread throughout the land surrounding europe.First the revolution sparked the gateway for great scientists like Galileo Galilei and Nicolaus Copernicus.Through hard work and passion these scholars,against their better judgement defied the church and published their findings.Before these visionaries,Europe was blind to see or believe anything other than what the church taught.Then in changing the way people viewed things thus came the enlightenment period in europe, when peoples new views on government were spread far and wide throughout europe without the …show more content…

Many of Galileo’s findings such as his laws of motion,clearly agreed with the ideas of Copernicus.These findings would later scare the Catholic and Protestant churches because this went against the teaching and authority of both churches.The church was afraid that if people believed in Galileo’s finding, they would question other teachings of the church.In 1616 out of fear and desperation, the church warned Galileo not to defend the ideas of Copernicus.He would follow what the church said but he still furthered his studies.Then in 1632, he released Dialogue Concerning the two Chief World Systems.This book would clearly state that Galileo agreed with the Copernican theories. The Pope of rome was angered by Galileo’s actions ,so he summoned him to rome to stand trial before

Show More
Related
456 Words | 2 Pages

The second was the Ptolemaic or Earth-centered Universe, were the sun orbits the Earth. Galileo faced much opposition from the Catholic Church, and was repeatedly harassed and condemned by his contemporaries. The letter he wrote to Christina was to clearly state his view of mixing science and religion. He projected himself as a man that was only trying to expose the truth, but he was also trying to

Read More
1535 Words | 7 Pages

Who would dare assert that we know all there is to be known?” this quote said from Galileo really describes his stubbornness on his beliefs, even though he agreed to follow the guidelines he just couldn’t tell lies about how he felt. Once the book was published people did not take it lightly as the book did ridicule the church and their beliefs. The pope called for a meeting to examine the book and they found that Galileo did not follow through with his word. He did not keep the Copernican Theory hypothetical instead he made it seem more like it was a fact and the

Read More
531 Words | 3 Pages

Sadly with all these great ideas and theories, the Catholic Church was teaching the exact opposite. They were especially infuriated about the Copernican System. Nicholas Copernicus’s, the man Galileo was trying to support on the system, book “De Revolutionibus,” became a part of the banned section of books. “Pope Paul V summoned Galileo to Rome and told him he could no longer support Copernicus publicly.” Galileo wrote a personal letter to Benedetto Castelli, an associated mathematician and an expert on hydraulics, about Copernicus and “expressed the view that the bible was not to be taken literally, when its metaphorical expressions conflicted with reason and observation.”

Read More
916 Words | 4 Pages

He was opting to publish ‘‘The Two Chief World Systems” against the dictate of the Church to spread the controversial scientific research. Galileo was advised to proceed with his plan but to be cautious not to stir up a concern with the Church theologians. Galileo had to publish the book, ‘‘The Two Chief World Systems” because it contained real facts about the solar system. But during then, there was no empirical evidence required by the Church to prove the claims (Galileo Affair, pg. 3). Publishing of the book sparked up a dialogue between his followers and the Church.

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

In this book, he established the imperfection of the heavens by describing dark patches on the sun’s surface. He also said that he preferred the idea that the earth orbited the sun. Galileo also wrote that the words of the Bible had to be interpreted based on modern science and was incorrect. Therefore, the church became mad at Galileo. Galileo was then banned from coming or going back to church.

Read More
355 Words | 2 Pages

Believing in the Copernican Theory could get you in a lot of trouble back then because it was against the church’s belief of an earth-centered solar system also known as Geocentricism. The church in the 1500s-1600s was

Read More
1418 Words | 6 Pages

It was rumored he went to the tower or Pisa and even dropped weights to debunk Ancient Greek Aristotle’s dropping body theory. Later, word of an invention called the telescope hit Galileo’s ears and he was able to vastly improve it. Galileo debunked many other popular theories about astronomy and ultimately proved that the earth and other plants swing around the sun as Nicolaus Copernicus theorized earlier rather than the universe going around the earth like everyone else believed. Soon the Catholic Church demanded that Galileo abandon Copernicus Theory. (2)

Read More
844 Words | 4 Pages

In that same year Galileo developed the Universal law of acceleration. Which states that no matter how different two like objects are they fall at the same rate as each other, “http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Galileo.html”. He would also end up agreeing with the theory that Copernicus had developed which said that all planets that man had discovered revolved around the sun not that everything revolved around the earth. This was not a widely accepted opinion since almost everyone agreed with the Catholic Church who agreed with Aristotle’s theory that the Sun, moon, and the other planets revolved around the earth,

Read More
816 Words | 4 Pages

Galilea expressed his belief in the bible and the teachings of the church however, he believed because the bible has so many underline meanings which are quite abstruse. He believed that the church as well as other scientist, should rely more on our sense rather than anything else. His idea was stated during a time where the church still had a lot of control, and the scientific community was just beginning to thrive with all their findings. Although correct in his accusation toward the church and the abuse he received from the Inquisition makes his ideas more biased regarding his feelings concerning the incorporation of the bible into science. Galileo was not the only one who shared these ideas, in fact Sir Isaac Newtown had a lot to say regarding how the scientific community and the church could work together to further advance the number of findings

Read More
1685 Words | 7 Pages

This was such an absolute certainty at the time, that the church targeted any dissenters, hoping to shut down challengers. It wasn’t until Copernicus challenged this certainty, did society truly progress rather than stagnate. By causing narrow mindedness, accepting truths blindly through full certainty staunches

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

The Scientific Revolution was a time during the Middle Ages when many discoveries were made throughout the world, particularly in America and France. This time period - considered the birth of the modern world - lasted roughly between the 16th and 18th century, and during this time, new ideas fundamentally changed the way people thought. During this same time period, the Age of Enlightenment kicked into high gear and prompted many great philosophers to make changes to society, thus altering the ways in which many people lived. During the Enlightenment, there were four principal philosophers who held varying views on government - Locke, Rousseau, Voltaire, and Montesquieu. Locke, the only English philosopher of this quartet, believed that humans

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

The Scientific Revolution started a domino effect of people beginning to understand the powers they held. People could freely ask questions instead of indiscriminately accepting what they were told. A basic summary of this effect is written in the first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, “When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and assume among the powers of the earth…which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them…” (p. 72).

Read More
325 Words | 2 Pages

The series of events that led to the birth of modern science is called the Scientific Revolution. This event occurred between 1540-1700, and it was an event that radically changed the world. The reason this event changed the world was because the concept of science was introduced, with science people began to look at the world in many different ways. Before the revolution, people studied were given advice from authorities like ancient Greek writers and Catholic Church officials. After the revolution, people began to observe more instead of relying on what they were told.

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

Enlightenment leads to Revolution In the resent hundred years there have been many advancements in the field of science and medicine. For example the scientific method. The old way for the scientific method was that scholars relied on ancient authorities, church teachings, common sense, and reasoning to explain the physical world. Now we use observation, experimentation, and scientific reasoning to gather knowledge and draw conclusions about the physical world says, (Roger B. Beck, Linda Black, Larry S. Kreiger, Phillip C. Naylor & Dahia Ibo Shabaka 1240).

Read More
1146 Words | 5 Pages

Galileo was saying if it is truth than another truth cannot disprove it. Truth is proven, not debatable and can never be disproven. If it is truth than it is a fact and other facts (in this case new discoveries) cannot disprove what is real truth. Even though Galileo we don’t know whether the discoveries or religious beliefs he was arguing are correct the point is the philosophical statement he was making about truth. Once something is known to be truth, it will stay truth and is something to be trusted

Read More

More about How Did The Scientific Revolution Affect The Enlightenment In Europe

Open Document