ipl-logo

How Does A Carbon Footprint Of Meat Affect The Environment

701 Words3 Pages

One small thing I’m willing to do is to stop eating meat completely. Believe it or not meat has a big affect on our environment. Meat isn’t all that healthy or good for us or our surroundings.
By cutting meat completely off from my diet I’m limiting on my carbon footprint. A carbon footprint is the amount of carbon dioxide you are putting in the air and other carbon compounds that you are putting in the air. Meat is being transferred from one place to another and reaches a number of places before it actually gets to you. When meat arrives to your home, it had traveled from a farm, to an industry, to a company, to being shipped to different supermarkets where you go buy your meat. The amount of carbon dioxide being put in the air is a lot. Cutting meat completely off from my diet decreases my carbon footprint by a large number.
This is …show more content…

My food chain is going to be limited to helping the environment. By cutting meat completely off from my diet, so much cattle aren’t going going to be malnutritious or treated horribly, they will look at why people decided to cut off meat and try to make it better and find healthier solutions. Cattle will eat what they're supposed to in their food chain which is actual grass, pasture. Making everything more organic. It will help make the food chain healthier and better.
The biodiversity won’t be such a big change, but me taking cattle off my diet will help even if it’s just a percent less, it will the biodiversity of cattle decrease. Cattle are being raised only to be killed roughly about a year and a half later. They are making cattle produce and produce so that we never run out of meat. I don’t think that’s right. I don’t think it’s right to have such a big variety of life in a farm being killed and slaughtered and butchered to be sent to other humans to eat. I don’t think it’s right to suffocate so much cattle together to make someone go home with money at the end of the

Show More
Related
577 Words | 3 Pages

He presents a compelling argument for why we have to recall lowering or casting off our intake of animal products, the use of evidence and records to guide his claims. for example, Foer cites the fact that animal agriculture is chargeable for more greenhouse gas emissions than all kinds of transportation combined. via presenting this statistic in a clean and concise manner, Foer makes a robust case for the environmental blessings of lowering our meat consumption. Foer additionally appeals to our sense of morality and values. He emphasizes the significance of compassion and duty in our food choices, encouraging readers to remember the ethical implications of consuming meat.

Read More
1217 Words | 5 Pages

Grazing and growing feed for livestock now occupy 70% of all agricultural land and 30% of the ice-free terrestrial surface of the planet. If these current events continue, meat production is predicted to double between the turn of the 21st century and 2050. Yet already, the Earth is being overpowered by livestock that consume massive quantities of energy and resources, whose wastes contaminate waterways and farmlands, and when eaten excessively, degrade our health. Pollan makes a considerable point when discussing concentrated animal feedlot operations, “The economic logic of gathering so many animals together to feed them cheap corn in CAFOs is hard to argue with; it has made meat, which used to be a special occasion in most American homes” (pg. 67, An Omnivore's Dilemma).

Read More
248 Words | 1 Pages

The Pro side of this debate is written by Wayne Madsen. He argues that eating less meat would help protect the environment. Mr. Madsen says that the way animals we use for food are being raised is hurting the atmosphere.

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

Experts recommend that adults eat just over half a pound of meat per week to help reduce their risk for diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, and/or strokes. “We don’t eat animal products for sufficient nutrition, we eat them to have an odd form of malnutrition, and It’s killing us” (Bittman). There’s a simple way to reduce not only our calorie intake, but our carbon footprint as well: “less meat, less junk food, more plants” (Bittman). While Bittman makes some very compelling points about how much of the meat we produce and subsequently waste, he fails to take into account the affordability of meat because of it’s mass production, as well as the simple facts that most people lack the time needed to produce meals with fruits and

Read More
1628 Words | 7 Pages

From the time man invented fire, animal meat has been a main part of the human diet. Meat, a product we get from other animals, is a primary source of our daily diet. Over time, we progressed from hunting with our bare hands to using tools, and then to guns, yet in the last century, machines were created to mass produce and process consumable livestock. We don’t even touch the meat ourselves until we are preparing it as a meal. The most common livestock we eat includes poultry, cattle and pigs, according to an article in Business Insider (2014).

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

What many people overlook is the fact that without livestock half the things we have today would not be here. For example, we would have no glue, make-up, detergent, and anything you could possibly think of. People refuse to admit that the livestock industry is a way of life. It’s something that has been done for many years, and maybe even decades by now. Without livestock we would not have burgers, hot dogs, or steak, and we all know we can’t go a week without a sweet, juicy steak creeping up on our taste buds.

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

In the past years Americans have become more conscious about their diets and the environment. More and more individuals are hopping on the trend to be more plant-based and some may wonder if leaving behind the precious protein that Americans have come to admire is worth it. Diving deeper into the environmental effects, economic comparisons, health benefits, and threats of the plant-based diet can help an individual gauge whether the pros of the diet outweigh the cons. Understanding the effects the meat industry has on the environment is monumental in the consideration of a plant-based diet. Not many individuals can grasp the number of farm animals that live on Earth.

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

With climate change and global warming taking a toll on Earth, the environment is deteriorating: Droughts and heat waves are frequent, natural disasters are intensified, and the temperature continues to rise. Thus, the leading causes of climate change need to be examined and changes need to be executed to salvage the Earth and save it from being slowly uninhabitable. While there are many approaches to the issue, promoting a non-beef diet is the best approach in decreasing carbon dioxide that contributes to climate change and global warming. The production of beef requires significantly more resources than other meat such as chicken and pork.

Read More
644 Words | 3 Pages

I am passionate about the environment and preserving its irreplaceable beauty. I learned about the magnitude of environmental destruction from the production of red meats through my classes and independent research. Cattle produce numerous environmental hazards, producing vast quantities of methane, destruction of environments for grazing land, using extensive resources of feed and water. One third of farmable land is used to produce feed for cattle that could be used to feed people. Current research makes it clear our world would be more sustainable adopting a vegetarian lifestyle.

Read More
301 Words | 2 Pages

The consumption of red meat has increased significantly in recent years. The link between red meat consumption and climate change is greatly evident. Therefore, this issue may be considered positive for various stakeholders, while also having a negative impact on others. Not only is the consumption of meat a major contributor to climate change, but the production of the meat consumed influences the climate as well. Livestock produces a considerable amount of greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrous oxide, which accounts for more than 18% of greenhouse gas emissions.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

The documentary Cowspiracy, overall, wants to tell us about the truth behind animal agriculture, which heavily affects the survival of our planet. Basically, the documentary said that animal agriculture is responsible for most of the greenhouse gases that lead to global warming, which also affects our planet. The goal of this documentary is to make us believe that the meat industry, and by extension the fast food industry, are the causes that lead to most of our environmental issues. Also, the documentary stated that the amount of water that is used for cows and other livestock is way too much and our planet will gradually face a lack of water. The solution that they propose is just to become vegetarians, which will solve everything.

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

In today’s world, there is a division among the people in the world regarding whether or not it is ethical to eat meat. After researching about eating meat and vegetarianism, I have come to the conclusion that it is indeed ethical to eat meat in today’s society. Sure, eating meat might have its drawbacks, but I have found that the benefits of eating meat far outweigh the negatives of eating it. Eating meat not only helps improve people’s health, but it also helps strengthen our economy and it has little difference in the environmental impact that involves in the farming of vegetables. Eating too much of anything usually results in a negative outcome.

Read More
1421 Words | 6 Pages

Eating meat is beneficial to humanity, because they provide nourishment that cannot be obtained from other sources. Without the support of animals, humans lack a distinctive diet, that is essential to their well-being. However, since animals are so important to the diet, they deserve great care and respect as well. Humans were always hunters and gathers. They always knew that meat was a big source of protein that helped keep them going(Araki).

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

According to a study published in Nature, scientists believe by 2050 eighty percent increase in global greenhouse gases could be avoided, if human diets were equally mediterranean, pescatarian, and vegetarian. Truthfully, less animal products are what is best for the future of the planet, eliminating dairy and egg products would reduce emissions the most as confirmed by Marco Springmann

Read More
1727 Words | 7 Pages

Over the past years, the average global temperature on Earth has increased significantly due to gas emissions. The demand for fruits, meats and other sources of food has been rising rapidly and respectively with the increase in Earth’s temperature due to increase in gas emissions in the atmosphere and the expanding global population. More significantly, countries with huge amounts of population growth, such as the United States, China, India, and the European Union have greater demand for food, which has higher carbon footprints. For example, China with 9040.74 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions, and is number for fuel combustion. 1 The problem is that people do not know that switching to vegetarianism can help reduce the causes of global warming, which means what you eat can affect how the world will be in the future.

Read More

More about How Does A Carbon Footprint Of Meat Affect The Environment

Related Topics

Open Document