ipl-logo

How Does Brutus Use Language In Julius Caesar

428 Words2 Pages

Language is an important factor in speech, because people can be influenced in different ways. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare shows how characters get what they want by means of speech to different people. In the play, persuasion is used on many occasions for characters to get what they want.
An act of persuasion happens in the Tragedy when Cassius is trying to persuade Brutus to get him to help plot the murder of Julius Caesar. When Cassius is trying to persuade Brutus, he makes a good point about how, “Th’ abuse of greatness is when it disjoins Remorse from Power. (Shakespeare 2.1.18-19). Cassius explains to Brutus about how a tyrant abuses his power, and finds happiness from that. He makes this point and connects this to Caesar. Eventually, Brutus agrees because he takes an oath to “bring justice for Rome.” Cassius uses his language to carve a negative image of Caesar in Brutus’ mind altering his emotions to get him to join the conspirators, which is an act of persuasion through emotions. Persuasion between …show more content…

When Mary Antony is giving his speech, he shows anger and sadness throughout the entire speech to show his pity for the murder. During his speech, he talks about a specific stab describing it as, “The most unkindest cut of all. For when the noble Caesar saw him stab, Ingratitude, more strong than traitors' arms, Quite vanquished him. Then burst his mighty heart” (Shakespeare 3.2.178-181). Brutus was considered as a best friend to Caesar, and when seeing a best friend betray another, it broke Mark Antony and stirred up the crowd emotionally, especially when they saw Mark Antony breaking down into tears. When Mark Antony read Caesar’s will, he used words like mighty and noble to praise Caesar. This type of language can affect the opinion of the crowd. The shift in emotions is what ultimately leads to the persuasion of the crowd and the downfall of the

Show More
Related
957 Words | 4 Pages

In Julius Caesar, both Antony and Brutus delivered languishing speeches using rhetorical devices to attract the audience and persuade the crowd that their opinions were correct and logical. Marcus Brutus used more of a scare tactic and threatened the people of Rome to challenge him. Mark Antony used more of a sentimental and emotional technique to appeal to the vulnerable audience. He speaks to the crowd, rather than above it as Brutus does in his lofty speech of honor. Mark Antony presented the more rhetorically effective speech using the vulnerability of the Roman citizen’s feelings and the techniques of pathos, plain folk, bandwagon and reverse psychology.

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

“But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.” (George Orwell, 1984). William Shakespeare intensified his quality of work by insinuating manipulative and persuasive language within his writing. Cassius, a loyal server to Brutus, was easy to coax Brutus into rebelling against Julius Caesar, gaining an additional member to his group of conspirators. Cassius altered Brutus’ thoughts of Caesar’s ruling, within the use of multiple effective rhetorical techniques.

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

His story of Caesar’s death riles up the crowd, but not enough to satisfy his desire for chaos. Antony furthers the crowd's emotions by comparing the crowd’s current actions to what Brutus’s would be in the same

Read More
664 Words | 3 Pages

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar In Act III Scene II in William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Antony delivers a speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral. Antony uses a sarcastic, empathetic, and persuasive tone in order to turn the citizens of Rome against Caesar’s conspirators and murderers. Antony’s purpose is to convince the citizens of Rome that killing Caesar was unjust. He attempts to convince the plebeians that Brutus, Cassius, and the other conspirators are not as honorable or innocent as they are acting by delivering his speech in a manner that is hardly noticeable. He does it like this because does not want to overstep his boundaries or rules given to him by Brutus.

Read More
1216 Words | 5 Pages

Leaders derive their power from a range of sources – military force, wealth, rank. However, leaders that we most admire win followers through the skill of persuasion. The ability of a speaker to persuade his listeners to agree with him signals that he is a powerful and astute figure. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the character of Cassius attempts to convince Brutus that Caesar should be assassinated. Brutus, however, cares deeply for Caesar and is hesitant to kill the beloved hero of Rome.

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

This is powerful in manipulating Brutus, because Brutus is an honorable man, and he is always concerned with what the most honorable decision is. Moreover, Cassius distorts Brutus' view of Caesar by telling Brutus that, "[Caesar has] become a god," and that Cassius "is a wretched creature," that if, "Caesar... [nods at] him," he, "must bend his

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony use rhetorical methods to craft a persuasive appeal that will make them more compelling when presenting their side to the audience. The purpose of Brutus' speech is to persuade his fellow citizens that the conspirators' actions were beneficial

Read More
617 Words | 3 Pages

The ability to persuade and use rhetoric effectively is one of the most important themes in William Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Several characters, such as Cassius and Brutus, employ rhetorical strategies. Cassius uses persuasive language to convince Brutus to support his effort to assassinate Caesar. Brutus uses logos in his speech at Caesar's burial to demonstrate rhetoric. The plan thickens as the play progresses, and Brutus, as well as some of the conspirators, become enraged with Julius Caesar.

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

Across the play, examples of rhetorical devices and persuasive techniques alter the characters’ opinions on matters. Similar to the purpose of mind control, statements adjusted to be spoken to a crowd of people can influence the overall mindset of individuals. One person’s thoughts can impact many and when the same idea is expressed constantly it will have a greater effect. The model from the play, Julius Caesar, occurs with Antony speaking at the funeral of Julius Caesar after Brutus articulates why the killing of Caesar was not a movement of hate. Mark Antony has the advantage of winning the audience over Brutus because he speaks after him indicating he can use the same statements as him but counter-argue them.

Read More
555 Words | 3 Pages

Generally, when people get their way with others, they do it with words, want others to agree with their point of view, give them what they want, or do what they ask. Such people make choices based on emotional appeals, and logical tricks to set themselves up as well as becoming someone else’s interest. Powerful words are used as a tool to mislead and deceive even the most intelligent men in this tragic drama of Julius Caesar. For example, Cassius is able to persuade Brutus to turn on his best friend, Caesar.

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

“Brutus and Caesar: What should be in that ‘Caesar’?/ Why should that name be sounded more than yours?/ Write them together, yours is as fair a name;” (I.ii.235-237) Cassius’ says because he wants to get Brutus to question why Caesar has become so popular and powerful, and why he deserves it more than anyone else. He wishes to build Brutus up, convincing Brutus that he is just as beloved and trusted by the people, and has the same influence Caesar does. Ultimately, he wants to persuade Brutus that he deserves as much power as Caesar has. Cassius uses another metaphor while speculating about how Caesar gained so much power and influence, just after he has finished talking about Brutus’ equality to Caesar. “Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed,/ That he is grown so great?”

Read More
381 Words | 2 Pages

In Cassius’s eloquent speech against Caesar, he primarily utilizes persuasion through tools such as pathos, rhetorical questions, and compare and contrast. Cassius uses pathos to begin his monologue when he claims, “I know that virtue be in you, Brutus, / As well as I do know your outward favor” (Shakespeare 1.2.95-96). By expressing that Brutus has “virtue” and “outward favor”, Cassius appeals to Brutus’s emotions, but not to an exaggerated extent. This emotional appeal is a persuasion technique because it is used in moderation and in pertinent locations. The context is appropriate since rather than using it as a tool to feed on Brutus’s emotions, Cassius only uses it to get Brutus’s attention as an appropriate hook.

Read More
1088 Words | 5 Pages

Influential words can alter one's perspective, after having a set mindset for positive intentions. In Julius Caesar, a book by Shakespeare, Mark Anthony delivers a speech in Caesar's funeral with intentions that would alter the plebeians perspective of Brutus, and Brutus´s speech. Brutus had formerly convinced the group while speaking that his main purpose for killing caesar was for the best of Rome, and that Caesar, the emperor, was unfit for Rome. As a senator and friend to Caesar, Mark Anthony believes that's bogus, and has promised to Caesar and himself, that he will seek to get the praise and honor that Caesar deserves. When someone fights to get their message across, they use syntax, diction.. to persuade a strong group of people to

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

His speech was powerful, but not powerful enough. Not soon after, Mark Antony as made a great speech. He uses his words to completely change the crowd and they begin to follow him instead of Brutus. One debater, from Debate.org, argued that words depend on weapons for anything to be done. To an extent, this may be true but it is words that control the weapons.

Read More
922 Words | 4 Pages

After bringing out Caesar 's Dead body. Describing what a honorable man his was. And showing them how brutal his killing was. In act three the people are angered and overwhelmed the people kill an innocent man simply because he had the same name as one of the conspirators cinna . the complete chaos ensures rhom may not look seem like a positive reaction to antony 's speech but it is in fact what he wants which is shown through soliloquy through the lack of almost no reaction to brutus logical and ineffective speech it is obvious that antony 's speech is more effective over the people of rome as speeches as a whole this shows that emotional appeal causes a much bigger reaction than logic and reason.

Read More

More about How Does Brutus Use Language In Julius Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document