ipl-logo

How Does Chris Mccandless Use Ethos In Into The Wild

1487 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: How is ethos used in the book into the wild

Gabi Cruz
Mrs. Root
IB English HL
6 March 2023
The Superiority of Into the Wild The non-fiction novel Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer narrates and discusses the journey of a young adventurer by the name of Chris McCandles, commonly known as Alexander Supertramp, who was found dead in the Alaskan wilderness of 1992. By utilizing the memories and experiences of those who knew McCandless, Krakauer leads the reader through over a year of detailed research that pieces together the truest version of Chris’s life and the cause of his death. Alternatively, “The Beatification of Chris McCandless: From thieving poacher into saint”, an article by Craig Medred, focuses directly on all negative aspects of McCandless’s story and criticizes Krakauer’s apparent …show more content…

Additionally, Medred provides little to no solid evidence, and the evidence he does present is obscure at best, rendering his use of logos useless as his claims are difficult to rationalize. Thus, through seamless use of ethos, pathos, and logos, Krakauer’s representation of Chris McCandless’s story is superior to Medred’s interpretation on the grounds of clearly communicated bias and neutrality, a lack of forceful opinion, and perspicuous evidence-based conclusions.
Throughout the entirety of his novel, Krakauer utilizes ethos to clearly portray his own biases and build the credibility of McCandless’s personal accounts, allowing the reader to decide the weight his words hold for themselves. He states in the author’s note that “I won’t claim to be an impartial biographer. McCandless’s tale struck a personal note that made a dispassionate rendering of the tragedy impossible. Throughout most of the book, I have tried– and largely succeeded, I think– to minimize my authorial …show more content…

The type of life McCandless lived is shared by few and understood by even less, inviting negative judgment for his lack of conventional life. Krakauer, however, illustrates McCandless’s journey as a monumental change, “At long last he was unencumbered, emancipated from the stifling world of his parents and peers, a world of abstraction and security and material excess, a world in which he felt grievously cut off from the raw throb of existence" (Krakauer 22). The tone in which Krakauer displays McCandless’s reasoning invokes a sense of understanding as to who McCandless was as a person and the disposition he presented throughout his life. While the statement is neither negative or positive, the descriptive language used implies an undercurrent of joy and the thrill of adventure, all of which McCandless had expressed to others and mentioned in his personal journal. However, the wording can be considered flowery, supporting the claim that Krakauer glamorizes “…the poacher Chris McCandless…into some sort of poor, admirable romantic soul lost in the wilds of Alaska” (Medred 1). While Krakauer admits to holding a personal bias towards McCandless’s life and story, his statements about McCandless’s emotions and reasoning stems directly from

Show More
Related
800 Words | 4 Pages

“Actions speak louder than words” is a centuries-old idea that, in recent times, has been famously said by both Abraham Lincoln and Mark Twain, and I think this idea should be the core of any look into the life and actions of Chris McCandless. However, I believe that this idea was hardly considered in Jon Krakauer’s interpretation of Chris McCandless in his book Into The Wild. Into The Wild is taken by many as the complete truth of Chris McCandless’ story, but many people seem to forget that Krakauer tells us in his author’s note at the beginning of the book that “[he] won’t claim to be an impartial biographer.” This means that any judgment of Chris that only uses this book is inherently flawed by Krakauer’s own views.

Read More
1196 Words | 5 Pages

Kyle Yin Ms. Everett ERWC, 2, 10 3 February 2023 Chris McCandless: Idealism and Imperfection In April of 1992, a young man named Chris McCandless walked into the Alaskan wilderness alone and attempted to survive off the land. 113 days later, his body was found by hunters, dead of starvation. Four years later, the author Jon Krakauer picked up on his story and published the book, Into The Wild, detailing McCandless’ story and eventual death. McCandless went into the wild to follow his very specific ideals:

Read More
568 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout chapters 8 and 9, the author showed his bias towards Chris McCandless, which is an act of defiance to his position as an objective journalist, when he attempted to alter the readers’ negative point of view towards Chris by the introduction of different people who had similar experiences and characteristics as him and then making comparison. After reading the previous chapters, the readers have already made their own judgement on Chris, which are probably mostly negative. To address this issue, Krakauer initiates chapter 8 by introducing negative comments and mails not only about Chris but also to him, the author. These will serve as an argument that he will later attempt to disprove while at the same time, still informing the readers about what makes Chris special and unique.

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

Jon Krakauer, talks about a young man, Chris McCandless, in his novel “Into The Wild.” As other Critics claims that he paints a sympathetic picture of a young man with a profound moral compass seeking higher truth; Krakauer disagrees with that. Krakauer has been through similar obstacles that McCandless had to face, while growing up. At one point Krakauer was in Chris McCandless shoes; however, he was smart about the materials that accompanied him throughout his journey.

Read More
901 Words | 4 Pages

Move on” to this response Krakauer defends himself by writing “because many people—both admirers of McCandless and his detractors—regard Into the Wild as a cautionary tale, it’s important to know as much as possible about how McCandless actually may have died.” The amount of determination of Jon Krakauer does make many critics and ordinary people question the mentally of the author however Krakauer could solve the mystery of McCandless’s

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

Christopher McCandless, the protagonist of the novel and film Into The Wild by Jon Krakauer, is not your average guy. Driven by his minimalist ideals and hate for society, he challenged the status quo and embarked on a journey that eventually lead to his unforeseen demise. A tragic hero, defined by esteemed writer, Arthur Miller, is a literary character who makes an error of judgment or has a fatal flaw that, combined with fate and external forces, brings on tragedy. Christopher McCandless fulfills the role of Miller’s tragic hero due to the fact that his tragic flaw of minimalism and aversion towards society had lead him to his death.

Read More
456 Words | 2 Pages

In Jon Krakauer’s fiction narrative, Into the Wild, he portrays Chris McCandless as a self-reliant and thoughtless young man. Unfortunately, he sadly passed after a unprepared journey into the Alaskan wilderness. Through a closer examination on his actions and words it reveals he was a deeply appreciative and misunderstood person. McCandless showed his appreciation of the world with his love for nature.. During his travels he took great joy in the beauty of nature and the idea of living with such a gift.

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

His persistence carries him through his journey into the wild, but also gives him trouble in later life when he gets a job at McDonald’s but leaves because they want him to wear socks while working (Krakauer 39-41). However, although McCandless has a few good morals, he lacks the belief of valuing family. This is evident when he states that, “I’m going to completely knock [my parents] out of my life… and never speak to either of those idiots again as long as I live” (Krakauer 64). McCandless’s beliefs give him a platform for his identity as a stubborn person that is hungry for something challenging, but also provides him with hardships and trouble along the

Read More
920 Words | 4 Pages

Christopher McCandless was a man that lived a very short but eventful and extraordinary life that had a lot of meaning, so much so that a novel was made to tell his life story. When the author, Jon Krakauer, wrote the story of Christopher McCandless in “Into the Wild” he developed a lot of themes throughout the novel that had significant impact to the story, as those themes affected the decisions and outcomes in McCandless’s life. Although the novel may have had many themes when reading throughout the story two apparent themes seem to affect almost every aspect of McCandless’s life story. These two themes are arrogance and idealism as they are developed thoroughly throughout the story and seem to be related as they interconnect with each other

Read More
401 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer gives his own in-depth look of how he feels about the young Chris McCandless. While doing so, he shows the opinions and stereotypes Chris has gained before and after he was in the wild landscapes of Alaska. It conveys how Krakauer feels toward this boy’s journey. Although Krakauer tries to maintain neutrality in analyzing the young Chris McCandless’ life and death, his own views become evident in the Author’s Note.

Read More
748 Words | 3 Pages

It is true that Krakauer mentions his own viewpoint of McCandless, but people can still have different opinions on him. For example, in chapter eight people have made up their opinions on McCandless base on reading the Outside article. They said he was “forsaken a loving family,” unprepared, not wise on going to Alaska, and was preparing to die (Krakauer 74). However, that point is not true because it was based on what they read from the article. By reading the article they only know the exterior of him and not know the reason why he went to Alaska.

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

Into the Wild tells the story of Chris McCandless, a young man who embarked on an adventure across the U.S. Chris lived for adventure, and sadly met his demise in the Alaskan wilderness. Chris’ death brought about a large debate as to whether Chris was insane or simply idealistic. Krakauer wrote Into the Wild to prove Chris’ sanity and soundly completes that task by using rhetorical devices to persuade his audience. Throughout the book, Krakauer uses ethos to develop Chris’ credibility by providing examples of people who are similar to him. For example, Krakauer provides multiple examples of people who were very similar to Chris, such as Everett Ruess.

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

However, Jon Krakauer proves his argument that McCandless was not arrogant, foolish, antisocial, or crazy by giving examples of other young men who were similar to McCandless to show that his journey wasn’t unprecedented. He also proves that McCandless wasn’t antisocial because he developed personal relationships with Ronald Franz, Wayne Westerberg, and Jan Burres in such a short amount of time and explaining the many times that McCandless respected the Alaskan Bush. Krakauer admits that McCandless may have suffered from hubris; he was still a victim of circumstances. Krakauer proves that McCandless had an intrinsic motivation to discover and that he wasn’t alone because Krakauer too ventured into the Alaskan Bush when he was younger. The Alaskan Bush is a very difficult place to survive if one isn’t prepared for many challenges such as hunting for food or staying warm in the frost ridden

Read More
629 Words | 3 Pages

Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild investigates the life and adventures of Chris McCandless. The author provides information about Chris’ life to illuminate his journey. Krakauer also uses rhetorical appeals to defend Chris’ rationale for his journey. Through Krakauer’s use of pathos, ethos, and logos, he persuades the audience that Chris is not foolish; however, Krakauer’s intimacy with Chris and his adventures inhibits his objectivity.

Read More
664 Words | 3 Pages

The revelation that he was merely human, and frightfully, so beyond my power to forgive (148 Krakauer ).” And how McCandless could not accept how his father wanted to used money to get Chris to be someone that he is not or control him. Another example for the distaste towards authority, “Like McCandless, figures of male authority aroused in me a confusing medley of cork fury and a hunger to please... If something captured undisciplined imagination, I pursued it with a zeal bordering on a obsession, and from the age of 17 until my late twenties... (134 Krakauer

Read More

More about How Does Chris Mccandless Use Ethos In Into The Wild

Related Topics

Open Document