ipl-logo

How Does Marc Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

618 Words3 Pages

“Julius Caesar,” by William Shakespeares is based on the killing of Julius Caesar and the events that follow his death. After Julius Caesar was killed by a group of men, which included Marcus Brutus and Cassius, two speeches were recited. One by Marc Antony and the other by Marcus Brutus. Both men gave reasonable speeches concerning their side of the situation. The question that has surfaced now is, “How were the speeches similar, but different?” As well as, “Who had the better speech?” Each man’s speech used the rhetorical strategies of pathos, logos, and ethos to give a clear understanding of what each wanted the people of Rome to take from their speeches. Marc Antony speech was stronger due to his effective different rhetorical strategies. …show more content…

Antony says, “look in this place ran Cassius’ dagger through… See what a rent the envious Casca made… Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabbed.” These images stir up emotion, Antony wants the people of Rome to be infuriated with Brutus and mentally paint a picture of what they did. Brutus takes a different approach and for a testimonial, “any dear friend Caesar’s, to him I say, that Brutus’ love Caesar was no less than his.” The similarity between the two speeches shows a goal both men wanted to achieve, which is to appeal to the heart and emotion. Antony’s speech, “Judge, O you gods, how dearly Caesar loved him.” Brutus evidence as already been represented by the quote previously in the …show more content…

Ethos is the ongoing establishment of a writer’s or speaker’s authority and credibility. “They that have done this deed are honorable.” Antony shows an accurate citation of source from this quote. To elaborate, Antony was giving credit where credit was due, to Brutus and Cassius and the group of men that helped killed Caesar honorable. Brutus’s quote, I have the same dagger for myself, when it shall please m country to need my death,” analysis humility. Succeeding Caesar’s death Brutus didn’t go around flaunting that he and a group of men killed Julius Caesar. Though there are different ethos categories, here are the similarities. The appropriate tone was illustrated by both speeches. Antony's quote, “if you have ten, prepare to shed them now.” Brutus’s, “for mine honour, censure me in your wisdom, that you may the better judge. Due to the certain situation both men wanted to make sure they come across as gentlemen and soft-hearted to the people of

Show More
Related
1498 Words | 6 Pages

Antony’s speech paints Brutus as a hypocrite, when, ironically, it is Antony who is the true deceiver. Throughout his speech, Antony

Read More
957 Words | 4 Pages

In Julius Caesar, both Antony and Brutus delivered languishing speeches using rhetorical devices to attract the audience and persuade the crowd that their opinions were correct and logical. Marcus Brutus used more of a scare tactic and threatened the people of Rome to challenge him. Mark Antony used more of a sentimental and emotional technique to appeal to the vulnerable audience. He speaks to the crowd, rather than above it as Brutus does in his lofty speech of honor. Mark Antony presented the more rhetorically effective speech using the vulnerability of the Roman citizen’s feelings and the techniques of pathos, plain folk, bandwagon and reverse psychology.

Read More
638 Words | 3 Pages

So it is all on the line for Antony and Brutus. Brutus did a great job of using logos and lots of ethos in his speech, but most of his reasons to justify Caesar’s slaying were predictions of Caesar’s future behavior. Antony uses a lot of statements that are primarily pathos to persuade the crowd that the great Julius should still be alive. This is most of the reason why Antony’s address is the better of the two. Here are some of the fallacies that Brutus uses.

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

In the play Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, the emperor of Rome is killed by his best friend, Brutus. At the funeral of the fallen ruler, Brutus gives a big speech to the crowd. He tries to explain why he and the other senators had to kill the emperor, Julius Caesar. In the speech, he informs them that Caesar was too ambitious, and says he chose Rome over his dear friend. Once Brutus was done, Marc Antony gave his speech to persuade the crowd that Julius wasn’t ambitious at all.

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar Speeches Comparison After the assassination of the Roman leader, Julius Caesar many people were left devastated. The Romans continuously questioned Caesar’s death, which lead to the two men, Mark Antony and Brutus to deliver speeches to the citizens. Brutus gave the citizens a speech with tons of logos to keep the citizens engaged in the beginning, but the tables turned after Antony’s speech. Even though Brutus had a strong impact on the citizens of Rome, Antony grabbed the citizens attention more effectively by showing sympathy for Caesar. Although both of the speeches given were convincing and persuasive, Antony ultimately made a lasting impact because he used pathos when he says “ when that poor have cried, Caesar hath wept”

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

Most times, when one thing is said, two things can be heard. The intent of the speech can be genuine and straightforward, or hidden in double-think and entendre. In Julius Caesar, this is the case with the dichotomy between Brutus and Marc Antony's speeches. the speeches both are given to sway the crowd to one side, and both use the tools of pathos, ethos, and antithesis to lead the country to their rallying cry.

Read More
620 Words | 3 Pages

An example of ethos from Brutus is,“Then none have I offended. I have done no more to Caesar, than you shall do to Brutus. The question of his death is enrolled in the Capitol; his glory not extenuated, wherein he was worthy, nor his offences enforced, for which he suffered death. ”(III.ii.32-35) Ethos are ethical appeal or also said to be what's right vs. wrong. In that quote Brutus uses ethos to say that he has done the right thing to save Rome from Caesars rule.

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

In the play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" by Shakespeare, two individuals named Brutus and Antony give a funeral oration to the people of Rome in concern of the justification of Caesars death. Both of them share an opposite view towards the death of Caesar, Antony thinks his death was unjustified, while Brutus believes in the opposite. Despite the fact that Brutus was able to deliver a better ethical appeal. Antony delivers a more persuasive rhetorical speech since he appeals to the crowd more with his emotional and logical appeal Ethical appeal was used by both individuals in their funeral orations, evidently Brutus was able to execute a better ethical appeal than Antony. Brutus wanted to make the people of Rome feel like the death of Caesar was necessary for the sake of Rome.

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

At the funeral, both of Caesar’s friends, Brutus and Antony, made a speech. In Brutus’s speech he was very concise and was saying that he did it all for Rome. Brutus used logos and ethos in his speech. To fortify his speech, he used logos which is logic and reason. In his speech, he says listen to my reasons and he goes onto his reasons that Caesar would have become ambitious and enslaved them all.

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

In Act 3, Scene 2 of the tragedy of Julius Caesar written by Shakespeare, there are 2 very important speeches that shape the countrymen’s view on the death of Caesar. Marcus Brutus gives the first speech in an attempt to justify the murder he and his fellow conspirators just committed and the second speech is given by Mark Antony to open the citizen’s eyes to just how dishonorable and heinous the crime these men committed was. Both men use many rhetorical strategies in their speeches such as syntax to create juxtaposition and word choice to highlight the similarities and differences between the audience and the speaker in order to create an effect of either superiority or relatability to the audience. Each speech was effective in persuading the people to agree with a certain view, however in the end Mark Antony gave the speech that won the crowd.

Read More
960 Words | 4 Pages

Caesar Speech Comparison Shakespeare wrote the play “Julius Caesar” based on the historical figure Julius Caesar. The tragedy focuses on the well known demise of Caesar and the aftermath of his death. Directly following Caesar’s death, Shakespeare has imagined the speeches that Brutus and Mark Antony could have given at the funeral. Brutus being Caesar’s murderer, and Mark Antony a friend of Caesar 's plotting for revenge. The two speeches contrast greatly in the intent of their meaning, and they use stylistic devices in order to do so.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

Rhetoric in the Speeches of Brutus and Antony The death of Caesar is a controversial topic and was even more controversial at the time of his funeral when when senators were trying to benefit from his death by getting the Roman citizens on their side. At Caesar’s funeral, two senators gave speeches as an attempt to get the roman people on their side. Out of the two speeches, Marc Antony’s speech was more effective because of his use of appeals and biases, being 100% true and had a larger variety of rhetorical devices.

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

III.ii.93–96” Here is where Antony contradicts Brutus’s previous points about Caesar, and takes Brutus’s credibility away by showing them that even an honorable man like Brutus will stab you in the back. The figure of speech that keeps showing up with all these elements and ties them all together to make this funeral speech complete and convincing enough against the conspirators is repetition. Repetition shows up a lot in the speech and helps get into people’s minds that Caesar was a good guy and didn’t deserve to die. Calling Brutus an honorable man repeatedly is hurting his image, because Antony is putting the words honorable man with negative thoughts putting negativity towards Brutus.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.

Read More

More about How Does Marc Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document