ipl-logo

How Does Mark Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

831 Words4 Pages

Plays are an important part of our human culture. One of the best play writers, William Shakespeare wrote a play called “Julius Caesar” which was about the real roman king Julius Caesar. After Julius Caesar died in the play, two important characters, Antony and Brutus went up and made their speeches. Using the 3 writing forms ethos, pathos and logos, I will decide the winner of these two conflicting speeches. This is written by Ramy Alawar, a freshmen high school student that resides in the country of America. Ethos is the rhetorical device to convince someone through trust, or ethics. I believe that both Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony had strong uses of ethos. Brutus starts his speech with a strong use of ethos saying “Romans, countrymen, and lovers! Hear me for my cause, and be silent, that you may hear: believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor, that you may believe” (1). Brutus was saying that all his honor was to be considered …show more content…

I feel like Mark Antony did a lot better than Brutus in using pathos. Pathos is Mark Antony’s most strategically used form of speech. He uses a little bit of pathos in his first speech saying that “He was my friend, faithful and just to me” (4), This says Caesar was a good man, and was unjust to murder. Antony then talks about the stabs in Caesar, he points out the stabs of Casca and Cassius, but doesn’t bring much attention to them. Then he brings attention to Brutus’s stab, Antony says “This was the most unkind cut of them all” (8), He then gets angry, and so do his fellow Romans. He sums his point up by rhetorical irony, saying that the work that the conspirators have done is “honorable”. Brutus’ pathos was not used much, he just used continuous repetition of saying Caesar was a close friend of his, and he was sad to let him go. Due to Antony’s strong use of pathos and Brutus’ mediocre use of pathos, Mark Antony done better than

Show More
Related
1498 Words | 6 Pages

Brutus has a hero complex; this is his Achilles heel. The way he justifies his actions makes it sound like he is taking credit for the great deed of murder. Antony uncovers this and uses it to expose Brutus’s hypocrisy. Ethos, logos, and pathos add substantial potency to Antony’s persuasiveness. No matter the motive, the crowd was bound to see the flaws of Brutus’s defense.

Read More
278 Words | 2 Pages

While Brutus delivers a powerful and moving speech, Marc Anthony uses excessive methods of pathos

Read More
438 Words | 2 Pages

During the seminar, many different view points and perspectives were expressed. One of the ideas that were discussed was that Antony and Brutus used different rhetoric devices to express their feelings. Antony used many examples of pathos in both his funeral speech and his everyday life. He aims to establish emotional reactions from his intended audiences and sometimes over uses this device. Brutus on the other hand does the exact opposite.

Read More
916 Words | 4 Pages

He uses pathos in more of a way to create fear and hostility among the people of Rome. He makes arguments against Brutus and his reasoning. Antony uses proof to show that what Brutus was saying was incorrect about Caesar being ambitious. In order to instill this fear within the crowd he starts off by saying, "The evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones. "

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

When comparing two brilliant speeches that are presented in the Tragedy of Julius Caesar it is incredibly hard to pick which one I m a fan of. But that is only because of the dramatic irony that foreshadows the play for me. So expecting that you either have read this magnificent play or you haven't, you can decipher for yourself which one you choose to support. Both have their points in common but both have so many differences that it can make it confusing on which one is better. Before Brutus began his speech he said "Cassius go into the other streets and part the numbers.

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

In William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar, both the powerful Brutus and the senator Marc Antony give speeches on whether Julius Caesar’s death should be justified or not. Marc Antony provides a more persuasive speech because of his use of logos, ethos, and verbal irony. Marc Antony uses logos to show that Caesar did not show to be ambitious. He mentions how Caesar rejected the crown three times before taking it.

Read More
706 Words | 3 Pages

Caesar killed while running for king. Brutus and Caesar were good friends. However, Brutus persuaded the audience that he did not want Caesar to become king so he had to slew him. They both had some role in Caesar’s death it is just a matter of how much and how they played into it. Antony is the reason why everyone was turning Against Brutus.

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

Evidence of him using pathos is him saying, “There is tears for his love; joy for his fortune; and honor for his valor”. Brutus states that he loved and cared for Rome and its people more than he did for Julius Caesar, which is why he killed him. Him saying, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more. Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” Brutus is telling the crowd that they and their home (Rome) were more important to him then his relationship with Caesar

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout his speech, Brutus is seen using ethos to build up his credentials. He persuades the audience into believe what he has to say. In the beginning of his speech, he says, Believe me

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

In the play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" by Shakespeare, two individuals named Brutus and Antony give a funeral oration to the people of Rome in concern of the justification of Caesars death. Both of them share an opposite view towards the death of Caesar, Antony thinks his death was unjustified, while Brutus believes in the opposite. Despite the fact that Brutus was able to deliver a better ethical appeal. Antony delivers a more persuasive rhetorical speech since he appeals to the crowd more with his emotional and logical appeal Ethical appeal was used by both individuals in their funeral orations, evidently Brutus was able to execute a better ethical appeal than Antony. Brutus wanted to make the people of Rome feel like the death of Caesar was necessary for the sake of Rome.

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

Antony uses pathos he communicates to the people in a way that Brutus did not. Since, Antony is not allowed to say anything bad at the funeral he discretely criticizes Brutus and Cassius because he feels that what they did was wrong. For example, when Antony makes a comment that is contrary to what he means, he says “But Brutus is an honourable man”. Antony uses a lot of pathos because he wants the citizens to feel the way he is feeling. For example, he says he wants to read them the letter but he does not want to make them weep because of how much Caesar loved them.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

This is ethos in the way it gives him credibility as a friend, suggesting that he would truly know Caesar. But, it is also pathos because it makes the crowd sorrowful for him because someone that is close to him has been killed. The use of ethos, logos and pathos made Marc Antony’s argument and speech far superior to Brutus’s. Another reason that makes Marc Antony’s argument more valuable is

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

In William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar, the tragedy of Julius Caesar’s death occurs. Mark Antony and Marcus Brutus each gave a funeral speech. While both the speeches were well spoken, Mark Antony’s ended up being the better speech. Antony’s better use and variety of ethos, pathos, and logos, his use of figurative language, and the comparison between Antony’s and Brutus’s speeches proves that Antony’s speech is in the end better than Brutus’s speech. Antony’s speech uses ethos to show everyone around him that he is their friend, and he understands what they are going through; also Antony uses ethos to get the citizens to listen to him, because while Brutus says he is honorable, Antony says that he is with them and where they stand in

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.

Read More

More about How Does Mark Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document