ipl-logo

How Does Tate Deserve Life Without Parole

615 Words3 Pages

Bailey Bordas
Ms. Becker
ERWC 1
May 7, 2018
Juvenile Justice My position on this topic is that kids should not be sentenced with life without parole unless it was an intentional planned out murder. Kids accidentally kill another human and get life without parole when they are as young at twelve years old. That isn't right because a kid that young does not know what is right or wrong so they just do it. A young kid should only be sentenced to life without parole if it was planned but other than that they should never receive that sentence. A twelve year old boy by the name of Lionel Tate beat a six year old girl to death. Tate claimed he was imitating his favorite wrestling move on her. Does this crime deserve life in prison without parole? I don't think this deserves a life sentence. Tate was a twelve year old kid who didn't know he was hurting this little girl. He thought they were having fun wrestling and doing wrestling moves. Lionel Tate was way too young to go to prison for life but they gave him the life sentence without parole. Research says that the brain hasn't fully developed especially at that age. How is Tate …show more content…

Greg was thinking about murder and suicide all the time, everyday, when he came home from his jr. high school. One night he got a twelve gage shotgun and shot his dad in the head once and killed him. He then shot his mother twice and killed her. Both of his parents were killed instantly. What Greg Ousley did was cold blooded murder. In this instance this kid deserves to be sentenced with life without parole. This was no accident, it was planned out how he was going to kill them and he didn't feel bad at all for doing it. Greg told the officers that everytime he got mad he thought about killing them and this time he went through with it. Greg got sentenced to sixty years in prison. When he got there he was fifteen years old, the youngest adult inmate at the

Open Document