More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of the 1860 presidential election on southern states
Vietnamization impact on the vietnam war
Nixon's policy of Vietnamization essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Dan T. Carter’s book The Politics of Rage: George Wallace, the Origins of the New Conservatism, and the Transformation of American Politics chronicles the rise and fall of George Wallace, a populist who abandoned his ideals to become a national symbol of racism. In chapter eleven, the book takes a look at the “southernization” of American politics, with a special focus on the 1968 presidential election. This chapter discusses how Richard Nixon used his “Southern Strategy”, George Wallace’s “Wallace Factor”, and how Wallace’s political style helped the Republican Party rise in the South. Richard Nixon saw the fractures in the Solid South that were caused by Civil Rights legislation as a way to draw in Democrats living in southern states that
Sectionalism was a leading contributor to America’s inability to reach compromise. The North and South possessed passionate political views that differed immensely. Both the Northern and Southern states felt unheard and unconsidered. The reannexation of Texas proved to be pivotal in how close America came to going to fill out war then. Northerners were willing to take Texas as she was, sought not to change the character of her institutions and realized that slavery existed in Texas.
The Vietnam war had been nicknamed ‘Johnson’s war’, which automatically put Nixon at an advantage over Humphrey, who was Johnson’s Vice President and still supported the war. This influenced Nixon’s election as many democrats turned away from Humphrey and used Nixon as an anti-war alternative. Humphrey’s stance led Nixon’s popularity to increase nationwide as, although relatively anti-civil rights, Nixon appealed to Afro-Americans like Martin Luther King, who had clashed with Johnson over the war. Nixon’s anti-war policies caused him to gain support from many unlikely areas of the USA, along with those in the silent majority that he originally targeted, leading him to be elected as President in
Previous United States President Richard M. Nixon had a remarkably favorable position regardless of his failure's picture because of his annihilation in 1960 presidential race and the 1962 California gubernatorial race, due to a few components. The central point was that Nixon was worthy to both the Goldwater preservationists and gathering moderates (894). His technique of selecting Maryland Governor Spiro T. Agnew promoted his support of white Southern voters because of Agnew's strong stands against dissenters and dark aggressors. His running enemy; Hubert H. Humphrey additionally helped Nixon out as a result of the LBJ Brand that shadowed his notoriety and the association in the Vietnam War. Not exclusively did this acquire supporters for
Nixon wanted to end the war just like every other American. He had many plans for this war and one of them was called Vietnamization. Vietnamization was a policy that would replace U.S. troops with South Vietnamese troops and supply them with supplies and weapons (Rubel 182). It was a way to retreat U.S. troops and end involvement in the war. Even though he ended involvement in the Vietnam War by withdrawing U.S. troops, he decided to bomb enemy forces in Cambodia (Lillegard 71).
In 1973, Nixon signed into law the Endangered Species Act. The goal was to prevent the extinction of animal and plant life. It was also to eliminate threats towards them. Vietnamization was a strategy that helped reduce American involvement in the Vietnam war by transferring all military responsibilities to South Vietnam. President Nixon really believed in his Vietnamization strategy, which was to build South Vietnam’s armed forces and withdrawing U.S. troops.
A popular reason why the Nixon administration formed the Vietnamization policy was to decrease US casualties and construct an army known as ARVN to gradually take over the American troops roll in the war. Alongside these military goals was the additional political goal of creating a westernized stable government within South Vietnam thus popularizing the country.
In the presidencies of John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson times were extremely confusing. Domestically, the civil rights movement was in full effect and the war in Vietnam was raging overseas. Another major implication on these two mens presidencies was the Cold War and the fight for democracy to rule over communism around the world. Thus, many of the stances these two presidents had on Vietnam involved being aggressive in the war and not letting communism defeat the “free” world. Their decisions were both aggressive and extremely stubborn when the scope of the war began to take shape.
As we discussed in class, Nixon ended the war by pulling troops from South Vietnam, which led to the Fall of Saigon, where many innocent people were left behind and taken by North Vietnam. The US spent billions of dollars on the Vietnam War, just to lose. The US could have used that money to benefit its citizens. It also left a lot of innocent South Vietnamese citizens, who helped the US, behind. Many of those people could have been saved, but they weren’t.
This is mostly attributed to the "Southern Strategy" or "The Solid South" and the New Deal Coalition. In the aftermath of the American Civil War the former Confederate states maintained a cohesive voting pattern for nearly a century. It became known as "The Solid South" and voted overwhelmingly for Democratic candidates for years. But as times, and party platforms, changed southern politics did too (PBS "Solid South"). One must realize that the Democratic views held in the 1950s until 1968 became the republican views there soon after.
The start of Democrats and Republicans was slavery. The Republicans were not for slavery, while the Democrats were. The south believed that the Bible said that African Americans were inferior to whites, and were meant to be their slaves. Once freed, the north attempted to integrate the African Americans through bills. The south did everything to restrict their freedom.
It is quite difficult to compare two wars that happened 180 years apart from each other, the Vietnam war 1955 to 1975, and the American Revolutionary war 1775 to 1783. Yes, both wars are all that different from each other, in fact I would say that they were the two least similar wars in American history. These wars are very similar because they both used guerilla warfare, a form of irregular warfare that uses tactics such as ambushes, sabotage, raids, and mobility to fight a larger less mobile military force. However a major difference in the wars was that the Revolutionary war was fought to gain independence, while the Vietnam war was fought to maintain independence. Another difference is that the U.S. were ‘Victors’ in the Revolutionary war, and were not so in the Vietnam war.
3. What is Richard Nixon’s “Southern Strategy?” How will this set the stage for Ronald Reagan’s success in the South in 1980? The ‘Southern Strategy” is a strategy Richard Nixon used for his election which was standing out to the white, southern people as the African American Civil Rights Movement and the dismantling of the Jim Crow laws arose in the 1950s and 1960s.
The war in Vietnam to do this day has gone down as one of the influential and controversial wars in United States history. The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.The nation as a whole began to uproar over the war and the major consequences of the war. There were many reasons why so many Americans were against the war. Public opinion steadily turned against the war following 1967 and by 1970 only a third of Americans believed that the U.S. had not made a mistake by sending troops to fight in Vietnam (Wikipedia). Not to mention, many young people protested because they were the ones being drafted while others were against the war because the anti-war movement grew increasingly popular among the counterculture and drug culture in American society and
With air-conditioning, skyscrapers, interstates, rural improvement to shopping malls, the new South was no more plainly separated from the rest of the country. The political, economic and social change in the South brought historical movements, belief systems and patterns into the Modern South. I will be concentrating on Modern South 's political parties, social identities, culture wars, environmental conditions and change in economic aspects in the middle of WWII and today. By the most recent years of the twentieth century, the Republican Party had turned into a noteworthy power in the South.
