ipl-logo

How Is Andrew Jackson A Foe To The Cherokee

472 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Andrew jackson's perspective on being against the indian removal act

Brayden Hawk
Ms. Warhurst
English I
April 6, 2023

Is Andrew Jackson a friend or a foe to the Cherokee

Introduction (Thesis) While some may say that president Andrew Jackson was a friend to the Cherokee Indian tribe, he was actually a natural enemy. I think Andrew Jackson was an enemy because in Doc 1,4, and 5, it states many things that make him an enemy. Andrew Jackson did help the Cherokee Indian tribe, but they lost so many things they can’t reclaim. Andrew Jackson got more than what the Cherokee gained and the Cherokee lost many things while Andrew Jackson lost nothing.
Body 1 In doc 1 Andrew Jackson is trying to convince the United States Congress that moving the native americans will be beneficial to all. Andrew Jackson states that it will make the southwestern frontier stronger, which will help other states to repel invasions without help and it will separate Indian tribes from contact with whites. Andrew Jackson also has said some questabile things about the Cherokee, Has enabled them to pursue happiness in their own rude way or to cast off their savage habits. In the background of this doc it says that it would be beneficial to all but in this doc it only beneficial to the whites. …show more content…

So he sent them a message saying they needed to move or they would have difficulties. In the message he also uses the condition of the Creeks as a threat all so saying their men are committing depredations to the white citizens and they are making blood shed. Andrew Jackson uses many threats to the Cherokee but making it sound like they are

Show More
Related
184 Words | 1 Pages

If he was really trying to help the Indians get their land back he would have not agreed that remcoing them benefits the Americans. In the treaty of New Echota it states.” That a sum not exceeding five million dollars be paid to the Cherokee Indians for all their land and possessions.” (Treaty of New Echota). Andrew Jackson also signed the New Echota Treaty so he wanted the removal

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

According to Remini, Jackson sought to relocate the Indians to ensure national security from the people that betrayed the United States. For instance, the Spanish and Great Britain armies enlisted Indians living within the United States borders as part of their battle strategies (Remini, p.113). By the end of the American Revolutionary War in 1783, all members of the Jackson family were dead and Andrew had been tortured by the British forces (Remini, p.18). As the Indians had supported the British, it was no wonder the white population, and Jackson, was skeptical about living in harmony with the disloyal tribe. On the other hand, the United States had more interest in acquiring more land for its people and the Natives were aware of the danger in which their homes were.

Read More
1467 Words | 6 Pages

Jackson openly expresses that having all the Indians in a new land, accompanied only by their kind, would be better than staying with the states. Jackson says they would be able to live freely in a secure place, guaranteeing their survival, while the whites would have more land. However, a member of the Cherokee people stood up and explained the reality. Document G

Read More
399 Words | 2 Pages

Therefore, he initialized the Indian Removal Act, and Congress passed it in 1830. This forced Native Americans east of the Mississippi River to proceed to the west side of the river. The Cherokee were willing to change to the white man ways, but Jackson just pushed them away. When the Cherokee were in alliance with the U.S., Andrew Jackson acknowledged them as a nation. While Jackson was against the Cherokee, he said they were not a nation.

Read More
1107 Words | 5 Pages

Even though Jackson was saved by a Cherokee native, he would not return the favor. " Chief John Ross sent Junaluska as an envoy to plead with President Jackson for protection for his people, but Jackson's manner was cold and indifferent towards the rugged son of the forest who had saved his life. " Junaluska was sent to beseeched President Jacksons to not push forward with the Indian Removal Act. Jackson wasn’t very magnanimity with the natives by pushing them off their ancestral land just so the U.S. can

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

He would refer to them in inhumane ways and forced them to move from their tribes just so he could benefit from their land. Jackson commented “... and perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the government and through the influence of good counsel, to cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, and Christian community” (Document 5). The Indians are being portrayed as aggressive animals when Jackson refers to their “savage habits.” Jackson not only made negative remarks about the Indians, but he also allowed soldiers to make the removal of Indians brutal, while knowing there was no way the Indians could defend themselves. Soldiers would not allow Indians to gather any belongings when they were picked up, not even another change of clothing.

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

So what? Comparably, President Andrew Jackson’s message to Congress on Indian removal discusses Jackson’s plan to remove Indigenous peoples from inhabited lands. Jackson said that Indigenous peoples were just a few thousand “savages” who were the reason why America was not growing and expanding economically (Document E). By removing those few thousand Indigenous peoples, Jackson promised that the other twelve million Americans would prosper economically, as well as civilly, religiously, and flourish as a nation. So what?

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson’s sentiment towards the Native Americans was certainly not a kind one. Manifest destiny was a popular belief among Americans, including Jackson, and he would go to the extent of forcing Native Americans out of their homes to reach their “ordained goal”. He believed in the expansion of southern slavery which is why he pushed for removing the Indians west of the Mississippi, which makes it the more disgraceful. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 said that it will allow American government to offer in-state territories to the Indian’s for their western land. This wasn’t the case when the U.S. went in and drove the Indians out by force.

Read More
1737 Words | 7 Pages

He believed Jackson needed a reality check. The Indians were there first, it was their land. He force the Natives to move away from their homeland, with brute force. He believes Jackson could not justify his actions just because it was for America’s benefit. He also stated Jackson refused to listen to many people, and he refused to let Indians live.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

Although Jackson was important, he was part of many terrible things. Around the 1820s there were many major indian tribes in eastern United States such as Cherokee, Chickasaw, Creek and Seminole. This soon came to a change. Andrew Jackson thought these Indians were in the way of eastern development, using the Indian Removal Act which the congress had approved he decided to kick them out and send them west. In 1831 the Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Indians had the right to self government and the United States could not interfere with that.

Read More
1064 Words | 5 Pages

P.2a Cherokee Policy Paper Andrew Jackson was one of the most controversial presidents due to his affiliation with the Trail of Tears and the devastating aftermath that emerged. Nations, like President Jackson and the US, establish their decisions with the basis of social, economic, and political policies. Consequently, Jackson’s contribution to the removal of the Cherokee Indians, an act that has been compared to ethnic cleansing, impacted these three principles. The Jackson Administration’s proposal to remove the Cherokee Tribe west of the Mississippi River resulted in a continuation of the previous social and economic policies, but changed the political policies conducted by the US towards the tribes.

Read More
239 Words | 1 Pages

President Andrew Jackson’s views regarding American Indians also challenged the law. Treaties were and continue to be legal agreements among sovereign nations. However, Jackson refused to believe that Native American tribes were sovereign and thus viewed Indian treaties as an absurdity. Ultimately, he forcibly removed a number of tribes, most notoriously the Cherokee, from their homes.

Read More
1874 Words | 8 Pages

The policies made by Jackson during his presidency were indeed motivated by racism, and he used them to ruin the lives of Native Americans, eliminate their culture and uniqueness, as well as to drive them out of their homes. One way Jackson’s

Read More
452 Words | 2 Pages

His government and a chief of an Indian tribe called the “Cherokee” signed the Treaty of New Echota in 1835, stating that all of the Cherokee lands now belonged to the United States for $5.6 million dollars. Many of the Indians did not want to leave, so resisted the treaty and stayed in what was once their land. Then, his government forced all of them out of their homes without time to gather belongings. This resulted in four thousand deaths of the Cherokee Indians due to starvation, freezing temperature, and disease (Alchin 1). Although some might say that Andrew Jackson built the United States and should not be labeled by what he did wrong, referred to violence and quarreling when something went wrong which resulted in cutting off many valuable lives.

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

He saw the policy of Indian removal as necessary to promote American economic growth and security. Jackson's attitude towards Native Americans was controversial, and he was known for his harsh policies towards them. He believed that they were inferior to whites and viewed their assimilation into American society as impossible. He famously defied a Supreme Court ruling that favored the Cherokee Nation's right to remain on their lands in Georgia and pushed forward with their forced removal. Jackson's role in the Indian Removal and his attitudes towards Native Americans have been the subject of ongoing debate and criticism by historians and scholars, with some viewing him as a champion of American democracy and others as a symbol of America's treatment of Native Americans.

Read More

More about How Is Andrew Jackson A Foe To The Cherokee

Related Topics

Open Document