ipl-logo

How Is Bomber Command Effective

534 Words3 Pages

Intro: From 1940 to 1945, Allied Bombers fought tirelessly in the grey skies of Germany in a campaign known as Bomber Command. Bomber Command during World War 2 was a very controversial topic due to the effectiveness and morality of the overall campaign. Some historians like W.A.B. Douglas and B. Greenhous argue that Bomber Command was ineffective as its strategic air offensive was intended to win the war, or at the very least to shorten it significantly by destroying pro­duction facilities, which it failed at doing. Contrary, Richard Overy believes that Bomber Command was decently effective as the bombers were supposed to help the infantry and navy take down the Germans collectively, and they did by 1945. Was the WWII British bombing campaign directed against Germany effective? Bomber Command was largely ineffective …show more content…

Notwithstanding, the smart diversion of important resources from the Eastern Front helped importantly contribute to the victory of the war by the Allies.

1st Body: Bomber Command, led by Sir Arthur Harris, was largely ineffective during World War II as it could not significantly shorten the war, or bring it to an abrupt end, by crushing civilian morale. In 1941, Sir Arthur Harris was sitting in London watching bombs fall on Britain as Germany was “sowing the wind.” One year later, revenge on his mind, ‘Bomber’ Harris was appointed the head of Bomber Command for the R.A.F. By practicing his strategy of area bombing, Harris claimed that Bomber Command’s strategic air offensive was intended to win the war outright, or significantly shorten it. It did not. Rather, as mentioned in a book review of Randall Hansen’s Fire and Fury, “Bomber Command did not end the war — it prolonged it.” As Adolf Hitler was gaining more and more authority in Germany within the 1930’s, his propagandist techniques brought the majority of the population on his side. By the beginning of the war,

Show More
Related
509 Words | 3 Pages

“Precision Bombing Will Win the War” is one chapter from the book “Wartime” which was written by Paul Fussell in 1989. He said in his book that people always thought there was a panacea, and people believed that the technology would help them win the war. American government thought bomber was the weapon of ultimate victory, and they emphasized that “America cannot lose this war.” However, when the war went on, people realized that aerial bombing had many factors that would affect its function and only few hit targets. There were many accidental attacks by aerial bombing, and what happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki indicated that intensification exceeded scruples.

Read More
2124 Words | 9 Pages

They only saw one enemy fighter in the far distance during their first mission on November 7, 1942. They were one of eight out of 14 planes that flew the mission and none of the designated targets were hit because of poor calibrating through cloud cover. Morgan remembered that they had no mission that was a “milk run”. He believed “the secret to a successful B-17 mission was tight formations - so tight that the wings often nearly touched in flight. That way, we were able to put out an amazing amount of firepower”.2 Every time they and any other B-17 bomber flew over enemy territory they were shot at.

Read More
1045 Words | 5 Pages

Although when the Allies attacked they were not in an actual battle. Unlike the European theater of War which started with a converging columns strategy. In the Pacific theater of war they acted quickly because of what happened at Pearl Harbor. One of the Pacific theaters tactics was to use B-29 bombers. They were very helpful in the war.

Read More
2007 Words | 9 Pages

Assess the Significance of Allied Strategic Bombing on Germany during World War II In this essay, I shall assess the significance of Allied Strategic Bombing during World War II. There are many reasons why the bombing has been so significant. For example, the Allied bombing destroyed German morale by putting them in a constant state of terror. Another key factor in determining significance was the effect that bombing had on the economy, the country’s war effort and confidence in the Nazi regime, especially in the later years of the war.

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

In this essay, the following question will be discussed. Why did the Nazis choose to bomb London instead of the English Airfields, and how did this hurt them strategically? The following evidence and reasoning will discuss why the Nazis decided to take the course of action they did, and how it affected them in their conquest of Europe. The research will primarily be focused on the reasoning, and strategic effects of this decision by the Nazis, but will also discuss how the British used this to their advantage, and eventually won the battle of Britain. All of of the sources to be used in this paper were written far after the Second World War explosively concluded.

Read More
1782 Words | 8 Pages

Deception tactics were an indispensable part of warfare in WW2 because concealment tactics led to the conservation of vital resources. In WW2 bomber planes were a big issue. They were used to bomb strategic military buildings or generate fear. The latter was seen during the Blitz. During the Blitz, German bombers targeted civilian areas, causing terror.

Read More
898 Words | 4 Pages

He participated in two exercises that demonstrated the power of long-range bombers. In 1937, Lemay navigated bombers to find a battleship off the US’s Pacific coast. In 1938, he completed a similar feat to find another ship, only over a larger area of the Atlantic. When World War II began, Lemay was in charge of the 305th Bomb Group as a major. Due to the US’s lack of supplies at the start of the war, Lemay only had a handful of bombers for a large number of crews.

Read More
1207 Words | 5 Pages

Over the course of WW2, the Tuskegee Airmen fought against the Nazi’s and their allies, and among other things, performed the critical role of escorting bomber planes throughout missions. Bomber planes were the planes that the US Air Force mainly used to bomb and fight the Nazis. The Tuskegee Airmen ran hundreds of missions, and along with protecting fighting planes, they shot about 261 enemy aircraft down (The Editors of Encyclopedia

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

Every plane that was flown made a significant impact on the war. At first the bombers weren't making an impact on the war at all, because the technology wasn’t advanced enough. The planes couldn’t carry out

Read More
1415 Words | 6 Pages

The stories of those who survived their flights are useful in piecing together the various events of the battle. One of the most successful bombers was Lieutenant Richard Best: he was able to hit two carriers on the same day. His success was in part due to his plane being unharmed, due to the sacrifice of the accompanying torpedo squadrons. (PG303). His hits effectively wiped out two Kidō

Read More
1247 Words | 5 Pages

The Battle of the Atlantic: How the Allies Won the War – Jonathan Dimbleby Dimbleby uses diaries and journals written by both the axis and allied sailors to describe the 6-year battle. The book focuses on the intelligence behind the allied victory and how they were able to pull off the victory against the strong German U-boats. Topics such as the technology used and created by both the axis and allies is discussed. This information will be used in the arguments regarding the increase in technology and the increase in aircraft technology as the book looks at multiple bombing runs and how each one was more effective.

Read More
314 Words | 2 Pages

By the time of 1945, strategic bombing had a lack of reason

Read More
1421 Words | 6 Pages

Back in World War One, airplanes were a thought of the future, but they became extremely prominent in World War Two, and essentially ruled the offensive and defensive strategies of the European and Pacific Theater. The Germans were able to defeat many countries through their use of advanced military equipment, as they notoriously demolished France, Belgium, Poland, Norway, and Denmark. Hitler was able to utilize many successful tactics such as the Blitzkrieg and the Sitzkrieg. Those deadly tactics, when combined with the use of airplanes and tanks, was virtually unstoppable. Germany kept advancing its technology until it matched Britain, who was able to consistently match and fend off Germany’s shiny new weapons.

Read More
1519 Words | 7 Pages

7). The Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF) lead by General Eisenhower approved the operation on 10 September 1944. Field Marshal Montgomery of the British Army championed Operation Market-Garden as part of his “Narrow Front” strategy. General Eisenhower’s “Broad Front” had been working extremely well so far in the war but was beginning to stall due to logistical reasons (Jeffson, 2002, p. 6). This operation was seen as a way to surprise the German Army and end the war before Christmas 1944.

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

The Royal Air Force Bomber Command would run attacks at night and the United States Army Air Force squad would run attacks on the Germans during the daytime. The RAF Bomber Commander felt that if they dispatched over 1,000 aircraft each night against the German objectives, it would destroy the industry of the city in hours and then the invasion of Europe would be unnecessary. In one night of bombing, over 1,000 aircraft used over 2,000 tons of bombs on Munich, destroying over 13,000 homes. In the daylight raids by the United States Army Air Force squads, had no protection of the fighter escorts like the Royal Air Force squads did.

Read More

More about How Is Bomber Command Effective

Related Topics

Open Document