How Is Curley's Wife Marginalized In Of Mice And Men

800 Words4 Pages

The Marginalized: Curley's Wife

Have you ever felt the extreme sexist challenges of being a woman? The irrational fear of differing from your peers and being judged on the basis of what sex you were born as, as "the bard of femininity," is on your shoulders, you are being objectified solely for the fact that you are female.
In John Steinbeck’s 1937 novella Of Mice and Men, the author uses the themes of loneliness, isolation, and sexism to explore the theme of the marginalization of women in this time and how it leads to extreme dissociation, self-harm, and pain.
Steinbeck's character Curley's Wife in Of Mice and Men exclusively represent women's marginalization because she is depicted as a tramp, and most people back then wouldn't …show more content…

We can see direct objectification of Curley's wife in Chapter 2 when Curley talks about her in a manner that is grotesque and filthy. He is foreshadowing that he is going to do dirty things to her since he sees her just as his pleasure toy and an object. “Well, that glove’s fulla Vaseline.” “Vaseline? What the hell for?” “Well, I will tell ya what – Curley says he’s keepin’ that hand soft for his wife.” (Steinbeck, …show more content…

She is seen as nothing more than an object that can be screwed around with, and that's why Curley insisted on killing Lennie once he accidentally killed her: Lennie, without harmful intention, took away his naive pleasure toy which gave him a confidence boost and a sense of masculinity. He believed he was the top dog because he was insensitive to women and was a typical member of the male species during this time by taking advantage of a woman. Curley truly saw no harmful intent in what he was doing and didn't care enough to see one.
All in all, Curley was a horrid soul who cared about nothing but himself. He was a vain, conceited man who thought his male identity made him an alpha whose ground had to be worshiped. Curley's wife is similar to Candy, another character who suffered from isolation and loneliness. They were both at the bottom of their social hierarchy and worried about being marginalized. One falls under the category of ageism, and one falls under sexism. They were both affected by this rough time and were startlingly