ipl-logo

How The Internet Changed The Way We Read

1240 Words5 Pages

When it comes to this theory, the theory does not tell the public what to think but what to think about. This is one of the theories that can be used to explain about the contents in the article on ‘How the Internet Changed the way we read’. The information that is contained in this article clearly sets the agenda on how the public is thinking about and even the issues that the public is talking about. As much as the content is no longer in the books or most Americans are not getting it from published terms, it is understood that the internet has in a great way made it clear that the public can still get information and utilize it in the best ways possible which will aid in making the public to think about some topics that are being put across(Johnson,2013). …show more content…

There is no doubt that a majority of people today are reading material that has been set out in the social media due to the way is able to sell more and even make the media outlets to gain some cash. For instance, the media outlets of today are being engaged in information that is able to make all the people read what is in the outlets after they have outlined the desired agenda that will make people follow and even talk about. The article mentions of how there is much skimming in the information that is provided online or on the internet and that goes to show that there is agenda setting for the aim of making information to sell …show more content…

This is because the information has already been done in a way that is supposed to arouse feelings from the public. At the end, what is expected is that the public is supposed to think according to the way the microblogging sites have put their information. The article mentions of how the same information can be posted in various platforms within the internet and that goes to mean that it is because the information is able to elicit a lot of comments from the audience and that is why information will keep being posted time after time. The reason is that the information has already set the agenda that is intended(Riaz,2010). In today’s information, there is no much caution being given to issues to do with character assassination but what is being prioritized are things to do with how the audience will be a

Show More
Related
432 Words | 2 Pages

Every day new technology is advancing to makes its way into the world where it is used more efficiently. In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?,”, Nicholas Carr claims that human are no longer able to focus on longer texts due to the rise of digital texts. Nicholas Carr includes strong evidences to support his statement; and through the usage of ethos and pathos, he is able to convince his readers that “the Net is becoming a universal medium” (Carr). Examples of Ethos are evident throughout the article making Carr’s argument deductively valid. Nicholas Carr is known for his reputation as someone who has written influential pieces and earning many awards for his accomplishments.

Read More
1532 Words | 7 Pages

Comedian Jon Stewart states “The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom”. In the chapter “Public Thinking” from the book Smarter Than You Think, Clive Thompson addresses the topic of modern day technology, and argues that the internet is an effective and useful tool which positively impacts the way people think. Thompson is a contributing writer for The New York Times and Wired Magazine, as well as author of the book Smarter Than You Think with degrees in Political Science and English. He supports this claim by referring to Ory Okolloh, a law student and blogger about Kenyan politics and corruption, and describing her positive experience with the internet. He then refers to the “audience effect” which can clarify the mind and change one’s performance.

Read More
330 Words | 2 Pages

In the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Nicholas Carr expresses his concern that the internet could be negatively affecting the way people think. He begins to argue his point by explaining his own issues of not being able to immerse himself in a book like he could before. Carr then reveals his suspicion that it’s the internet’s fault, and supports that by comparing his own experience to others. Reading is a common hobby for most of the people Carr compares experiences with. Like Carr, they found it difficult to read longer pieces of writing, and some blame the internet as well.

Read More
144 Words | 1 Pages

In the essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?,” by Nicholas Carr, he explores the idea that new technology is changing the way we approach literature. Not only has the approach changed, but also the way we process the information, or at what length. Information is available and compact in today's society, this is changing our thinking; therefore our reading patterns has altered. We are becoming as the essay refers to as “Pancake people.” Society can be spread wide in the things they know, but are thin in the quantity of one specific area.

Read More
996 Words | 4 Pages

In, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” (2008), Nicholas Carr maintains that the advent of the Internet produced a shallow generation of information consumers who lack the ability to deeply engage with a text and think critically about it. Carr supports his claim by drawing on numerous personal and historical anecdotes and one scientific study. The purpose of Carr’s article is to open dialogue about the potentially adverse effects the Internet could have human cognitive processes to allow individuals to begin to question the impact that the Internet is having on their lives. Carr establishes an informal, causal relationship with the audience. The audience of The Atlantic is generally well-educated, upper-middle class individuals who are likely approaching the article with a relaxed, non-critical lens (most likely embracing the article as a form of “think piece”).

Read More
1679 Words | 7 Pages

In his essay Is Google Making Us Stupid, Nicholas Carr argues that our dependence on the Internet changes the way we read and think. He includes his own personal testimony to support this claim, as well as others’ descriptions, including several friends, and bloggers that Carr quote. While he lacks scientific proof supporting his claim, multiple testimonies support his claim that the internet has changed the way people think. However, Carr views this negatively, saying that “I’m not thinking the way I used to think… my concentration often starts to drift… I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text” (633-634).

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

Carr describes himself over the past few years as being inadequate of reading a full book. He formulates a theory saying that the Internet is a “universal medium”, where people have instant access to almost any topic imaginable. Because of the accessibility of the Internet,

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

In Nicholas Carr, Is google making us stupid, He emphasizes on many points,the main point being , how before the creation of the internet people had to spend hours and hours in the libraries looking for the right articles, but now with the creation of the internet things can get done faster and more efficiently. He also he argues that before the creation of the Internet people that loved to  read and that had degrees related to reading found themselves less into reading when computers started to make an uprising.   He also argues that the  internet is being a primary source and now and it’s affecting our reading habits and demolishing our brains. In Clive Thompson, Smarter than you think, He’s trying to convince his readers that the internet

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

Humanity is in a perpetual state of trying to make living in the world an easier place. In just a few seconds, people can access information at their disposal, instead of having to look through different books to find what you need. But the question arises; does this boundless place for information honestly make us more informed than before we had the internet? Joe Keohane, the author of the article “How Facts Backfire,” is a political journalist who has also written articles on technology and culture.  

Read More
1355 Words | 6 Pages

iGoogle In todays vast network of the Internet and constant upgrades and updates of social media and technology is slowly erasing the use of actually using a book, whether it’s to gain knowledge on a subject or to find out how to make potato salad. In Nicholas Carr’s reading “Is Google Making Us Stupid” he talked about how technology is shaping our brain with the vast information the Internet possesses, he also talks about how we loose focus on long written articles, which he even uses himself as an example of this trait of becoming more intertwined with the internet. Also he talks about how we are becoming more and more dependent towards the Internet. I do agree with Carr’s main points of how we heavily rely on the Internet and that it’s

Read More
792 Words | 4 Pages

Carr’s friends feel the same way, stating,”...even a blog post of more than three to four paragraphs is too much to absorb, I skim it.” The internet has created a style of reading that puts “efficiency” and “immediacy” above engaging with a text. Carr reflects on historical advances like the clock and the printing press, stating how they “brought into being the scientific mind and the scientific man,” but it also took away our basic human instincts. The internet has quickly become our source for everything; map, clock, printer, calculator, phone, radio, and television. It has absorbed all the modern technology and has scattered our attention and concentration and taken our thoughts for their own.

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

For example, “What happened?’ He speculates on the answer: ‘What if I do all my reading on the web not so much because the way I read has changed” Carr says that the internet is a way to seek convenience but also because of the way people think. Overall the cognition of humans are negatively affecting their ability to read long

Read More
1368 Words | 6 Pages

Media theorist Marshall McLuhan believes that “the more we use the Web, the more they have to fight to stay focused on long pieces of writing” (315). The Web has caused people to loose their patience for reading long pieces of writing and only partially read it. Bruce Friedman, a blogger, admits that he has lost his ability to read long articles. Three to four paragraphs have become too much for him to read, so he just skims it (316). Maryanne Wolf, a phycologist, worries that the internet’s reading style is weakening our capacity for deep reading because it puts “efficiency” and “immediacy” above all else (317).

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

Rhetorical Analysis In the article “Is Google Making us Stupid?”, author Nicholas Carr expresses his idea that the internet is taking over society and our thinking process. Google is affecting our abilities to read books, longer articles, and even older writings. Carr believes that we have become so accustomed to the ways of the internet, and we are relying on Google 's ability to sort through the details for us so we don 't have to, in order to get the information we find necessary more efficiently. He finds that this process has become almost too handy, and that it is corrupting us from becoming better educated.

Read More
434 Words | 2 Pages

Our way of thinking is beginning to change to the way that computers do. Advancements are made everyday. These new advancements are attempting to make life in general easier for everyone. Nicholas Carr makes the claim that, “as the internet because our primary source of the information it is affecting our ability to read books and other long narratives.” Carr suggests that using the internet is altering the way that our minds operate.

Read More

More about How The Internet Changed The Way We Read

Related Topics

Open Document