ipl-logo

How Thomas Hobbes Curiosity Is The Lust Of The Mind?

780 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Thomas hobbes and the individual

Thomas Hobbes once said “Curiosity is the lust of the mind” and I have never agreed to a quote more. I mean, of course, there have been others, but none has truly reached my understanding of curiosity. Hobbes has created many pieces of literature, like the exemplification above, that have had a lasting impact on our lives today. Thomas Hobbes believed that because of our own greed and selfishness, without a ruler we would go into certain anarchy. In order for us to even picture a utopia, a leader would certainly be needed. However, this is where his morals and ideas are slightly faulted. How could we be ruled by someone who holds just as much selfishness as us? The answer is simple and in plain sight. Everyone must progress past our natural way of life and work together. We must appoint a sovereign or sovereigns in order for us to create and achieve a successful population. Thomas Hobbes has shaped the way our regime is today, for if his ideas were never introduced who knows what type of government we’d have right now. …show more content…

People have their own rights, even more surprisingly, women have their own rights. Our president is someone the majority of us vote for. Even being the leader of our country, he doesn 't have absolute power. We have three branches that keep each other in check. Not one branch has more power than the other. The United States government would probably make Thomas jump around with joy. Well, the outline would. The actual way we we are governed would make the poor man roll in his grave. His reflections on selfishness prove to be error-free in considerable amounts governments

Show More
Related
1053 Words | 5 Pages

There is no government, no authority whatsoever. Every being is born equal and share the right to do anything for their survival. His political theory was based off his idea that all humans are naturally evil and selfish. Hobbes said that this equality leads to war. “...a war of every man against every man.”

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

John Locke also went against Hobbes’ ideas by saying that government can be overthrown. These ideas all show different viewpoints, that government should have all the power, and that it should be split up to keep them from having all the

Read More
345 Words | 2 Pages

Hobbes argues besides, violence and lack of productivity , “No knowledge of the face of the Earth, no account of time, no arts, letters, or society” Knowledge is everything. Without knowledge you would be unable to spell or read this letter. At the same time absence of no knowledge of the Earth is a result of no productivity, in comparison if there is no productivity discovery cannot be made. Shortly without, discovery knowledge will not be perceived. In addition, to this living human life would be challenging because the next generation would not have prior knowledge to know what to do.

Read More
1162 Words | 5 Pages

He wrote the Social contract, which provided one of the basis’ for America’s government. Thomas Hobbes was alive during the English Civil War, and was against the theory, the Divine Rights of Kings. The

Read More
901 Words | 4 Pages

Thomas Hobbes He liked to study various types of government. He thought that the government of a monarchy was better than democracy because he had no doubt that they were naturally wicked and were not to be trusted to govern. He believed that it was better to have a governor like a king that would know how to act like a leader and rule a country.

Read More
1137 Words | 5 Pages

In today’s world, it seems to be that women have the same rights as men, but it wasn't always this way. The speech “Women’s Rights to Suffrage” by Susan B Anthony is the most compelling of all. Susan B Anthony persuades the audience that all women should have the same rights as men. It’s shown through the speech that the federal constitution says “we the people”, the government has no right to take away rights from just one gender, and that women are considered people as well. The fact that the constitution says “we the people” is a primary point in this speech.

Read More
1148 Words | 5 Pages

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke thought very differently during this time. Thomas Hobbes based his theories on government on his belief that man was basically greedy, selfish, and cruel. John Locke based his theories on his assessment of human nature or God. Locke believed that people could be reasonable and moral.

Read More
1591 Words | 7 Pages

According to Hobbes, a sovereign, whether the sovereign was placed into power by violence or force, is the only way to secure law and order. For him, if a citizen obeys the sovereign for fear of punishment or in the fear of the state of nature, it is the choice of the citizen. According to Hobbes, this is not tyranny; it is his idea of a society that is successful, one that does not have room for democracy. As a realist, Hobbes has a fierce distrust of democracy and viewed all of mankind in a restless desire for power. If the people are given power, law and order would crumble in Hobbes’ eyes.

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

One his theories, stated in his book called Leviathan said that people are not able rule themselves because of how selfish mankind is and they need to be ruled by an iron fist. His political theory was that was also stated in Leviathan was that we should respect government authority under all circumstances to avoid violence. Hobbes was scared of the outcome of the social contract which meant people could get rid of the government if they were unhappy with what they were getting. In order to make well with the social contract he states in Leviathan that people should be completely obedient to the government. His reasoning was that if there was no government, there would be chaos.

Read More
1441 Words | 6 Pages

When comparing the two different accounts of English philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke we must take into consideration a number of things such as the age in which they lived and the time in which they produced their philosophical writings. We will however find out that these two philosophers actually have a couple of things in which agree on even though most of their opinions clash. On one side we have Thomas Hobbes who lived in the time of the English Civil War (1642-1651) who provides a negative framework for his philosophical opinions in his masterpiece Leviathan and who advocates for philosophical absolutism . On the other side we have John Locke, living during the glorious revolution (1688-1689) he presents a positive attitude in his book The Second Treatise of Government and advocates for philosophical and biblical constitutionalism. It is important that we know that the state of nature describes a pre- political society prior to the social contract.

Read More
1815 Words | 8 Pages

He believes that the human condition, the traditions, experiences, and knowledge acquired by humans, is far to complex to be described by science and therefore avoids he commonly held views of political science from the Enlightenment Era. However, Thomas Hobbes, as he writes in Leviathan (1651) believed that all political phenomenons could be reported systematically as he equated all humans to machines, predictable by consistently acting in their self interest. [PG 3] Burke’s criticism that can be applied to Hobbes lies on three fronts; that the understanding human condition cannot be derived through logic; that consent, explicit or tacit, does not exist after the first social contract; and that a rebellion is neither possible nor effective when in a social contract. Thomas Hobbes’ prefaces his discussion of the social contract by giving credence to what he understood as science.

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

Hobbes developed the ‘social contract theory’, which is the idea that civilians give up some of their freedom and liberty for protection from the leader. This concept, which was used during Hobbes’s time, is still a part of the government today. Hobbes brings down this concept in his world famous book, Leviathan. A picture of a ‘giant’ monarch holding onto a tiny world is used to describe his version of the social contract. The drawing depicts the trade of freedom for safety.

Read More
1881 Words | 8 Pages

Thomas Hobbes has been famous for his philosophies on political and social order. In many of his scholastic works, he maintains the position that in the presence of a higher authority the duty of the rest of mankind is to simply obey. The discourse on this essay will focus on his views expressed in his book The Leviathan. In this book Hobbes’ views are fundamentally entrenched in his description that in a society with no higher authority life would be nasty, short and brutish (?) .This essay will engage in discussion by first laying out the conceptual arguments of anarchy and the human state of nature.

Read More
1740 Words | 7 Pages

Hobbes was an English philosopher, known through out the world as the author of “Leviathan” which is regarded as one of the earliest examples of the social contract theory. His writings were greatly influenced by the

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Thomas Hobbes proposed that the ideal government should be an absolute monarchy as a direct result of experiencing the English Civil War, in which there was internal conflict between the parliamentarians and the royalists. Hobbes made this claim under the assumption that an absolute monarchy would produce consistent policies, reduce conflicts and lower the risk of civil wars due to the singular nature of this ruling system. On another hand, John Locke counters this proposal with the view that absolute monarchies are not legitimate as they are inconsistent with the state of nature. These two diametrically opposed views stem from Hobbes’ and Locke’s different understandings of human nature, namely with regard to power relationships, punishment, and equality in the state of nature. Hobbes’ belief that human beings are selfish and appetitive is antithetical with Locke’s contention that human beings are intrinsically moral even in the state of nature, which results in Locke’s strong disagreement with Hobbes’ proposed absolute monarchy.

Read More

More about How Thomas Hobbes Curiosity Is The Lust Of The Mind?

Related Topics

Open Document