ipl-logo

How Was Andrew Jackson Effective Of The Removal Of Native Americans?

667 Words3 Pages

Andrew Jackson was one of the most proud and aggressive presidents the United States of America had seen so far in it’s young age. A demonstration of such a personality was his enforcement of the Native American Removal Policy. This Policy stated that all Natives be moved west of the Mississippi River, regardless of the Supreme Court’s rulings. This act of removing Native Americans from The United States of America was very beneficial to Americans, but unfortunately, was not helpful to the Native Americans at all. From this policy, Americans would gain more land, end America’s dispute between states and Federation on Indians, and would allow existing states to have a larger population and stronger militia. For Native Americans on the other …show more content…

An example being the new unimportance of Indian Affairs. Georgia and the Federation had recently experienced a great disagreeance on how Indians were managed. Furthermore, this disagreeance was brought upon the Supreme Court, and both sides followed their own ways of the issue, disregarding the Supreme Court’s final decision.With the Indians removed, it would “put an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the General (Federal) and State Governments on account of the Indians,” which would lead to a more united government (Andrew Jackson, Second Annual Message to Congress, December 6, 1830). Progress would begin to flourish with the government getting along, and states would also begin to …show more content…

Firstly, Native Americans would be forced out of their own homes, which were rich in Indian history. Proof of such events was when a Native American supported quotes “we wish to remain on the land of our fathers” (Howard Zim A People’s History of the United States). Secondly, the Native Americans had to suffer, and even try to survive the ‘Trail of Tears.’ As seen in Robert Lindneux’s painting”Trail of Tears.” The painting shows hundreds of Natives being walked west against their will, without basic clothes and health needs. This was truly a very sad chapter of American history. Lastly, Natives had to start their entire way of life over again. They came to their tiny new land with nothing but the little amount of clothes on their back. This wa a true trial for Native Americans, and was totally unfair because the united States of America’s “instantiated cupidity (endless greed) cries give!...give!” (Theodore Frelinghuysen, Address to Congress). Obviously, Natives were taken advantage of and forced into displacement for the good of The United

Show More
Related

Battle Of Little Bighorn Summary

297 Words | 2 Pages

It wasn 't fair to the Indians that they were always getting the short end of the stick and never being accepted for who they were. The Native

Read More

Andrew Jackson Abuse Of Power Summary

170 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Trail Of Tears

277 Words | 2 Pages

Under influence of president Andrew Jackson, the congress was urged in 1830 to pass the Indian Removal Act, with the goal of relocated many Native Americans in the East territory, the west of Mississippi river. The Trail of tears was made for the interest of the minorities. Indeed, if president Jackson wished to relocate the Native Americans, it was because he wanted to take advantage of the gold he found on their land. Then, even though the Cherokee won their case in front the supreme court, the president and congress pushed them out(Darrenkamp).

Read More

Evaluation Of Andrew Jackson's Native American Policies

148 Words | 1 Pages

Jackson’s Native American policies were very undemocratic because they decreased the power of the people. Document 9 states that the Native Americans have reasons to stay on their land, one being that the land west of the Arkansas Territory is unknown to them. Another is that the region is poorly supplied with food and water and that the new neighbors have different customs and a totally different language. Finally, they wish to remain on the land in which their ancestors died and where they were buried. The evidence helps explain that Andrew Jackson’s Native American policy was very undemocratic because the Native Americans had four very good reasons for staying on their homeland.

Read More

Jackson Indian Removal Analysis

327 Words | 2 Pages

Jackson faced the issue of Indian removal throughout his eight year in office. He made about 70 treaties with Native American tribes both in South and the Northwest. Jackson presidency marked as a new era in Indian-Anglo American relations imitating a policy if Indian removal. His annual message of December of 1829 contained extensive remarks on the present and future state of American Indians in the United States. It contained many observations, assessments, and prejudices about Native Americans that had been widely held by Native American hunters makers since Thomas Jefferson’s presidency.

Read More

Dbq Adams And Benjamin Franklin

1398 Words | 6 Pages

jurisdiction faced insurmountable oppression. The United States now had dominion from the Atlantic to the Pacific, thus Native Americans could no longer manipulate the prior competing imperial powers. Natives who once served as integral power brokers in the “in between” society now lost their advantage. The disease of American prejudice spread more quickly than the epidemics that killed many Natives in the first place. Anglo-Americans possessed Native land without notice, raped and enslaved Natives, and even demanded complete extermination of the Native people in many areas.

Read More

Andrew Jackson, The National Bank, And The Nullification Crisis

455 Words | 2 Pages

While Andrew Jackson may have believed he was helping the common man and ruling for the majority, his unfair and inconsistent presidency was reflected in his treatment of Native Americans, the National Bank, and the Nullification crisis. Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act into law in order to move Native American’s out of their own land to move in American settlers. For one, the Natives had no rights and no real way to reason with the US government, making it easy to remove them from any land East of the Mississippi. Jackson wanted to help the majority of Americans, but did not speak for the majority of Native Americans, who he considered savages and uncivilized. Jackson’s role in the nullification crisis was very important, as he helped increase sectionalism in the South.

Read More

Dbq Essay On Native Americans

1314 Words | 6 Pages

The United States sent armies into the Native American lands, mistreating the Native Americans, and caused trouble against them by sparkling conflicts and wars. “It is not, of course, to be understood that the government of the United States is at the mercy of Indians; but thousands of its citizens are, even thousands of families. Their exposed situation on the extreme verge of settlement affords a sufficient justification to the government for buying off the hostility of the Savages, excited and exasperated as they are…by the invasion of their hunting grounds and the threatened extinction of their game.” (Document 4) The United States government introduced policies for Native Americans to have a better life, but in fact, they kept them in

Read More

Andrew Jackson: A Hero Or Villain?

865 Words | 4 Pages

No living human is either entirely virtuous or wholeheartedly evil. Sometimes it can seem that way, but that’s because most of the time individuals hear want to hear what they want to hear. This concept is entirely true in regard to Andrew Jackson, who people can see as a heroic American war hero who came from nothing and stood by his beliefs or the complete opposite. People could also perceive him as an evil, tyrannical leader who forced thousands of Native Americans out of their homes. I believe Andrew Jackson was not a hero but a villain because of the way he treated Native Americans, the actions he took during his presidency, and the fact he was a slave-owner.

Read More

The Trans-Mississippi West

784 Words | 4 Pages

The government tried to force assimilation on Native Americans as well as an attempt to “kill the indian, save the man.” These ideas and policies are similar to those popular during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. Jackson developed a sense of ‘paternalism’ towards indians and believed he was saving them by forcing them to live out west of the Mississippi river away from white culture. The difference was that Jackson did not believe in assimilation of indians into white culture, he believed they should be kept separate. With the help of the Federal government removing indians from land west of the Mississippi, Americans were

Read More

Andrew Jackson Considered As A National Indian Killer

2337 Words | 10 Pages

In today’s perspective we see Jackson action as inhumane and selfish for only simply satisfy his own need to manifest further into North America. Jackson on the other hand saw the removal act as preserving the culture of the Indians. The Indian problem was way more complex that just simply removing all of the Indians and shoving them westward. Jackson had a four solutions to choose from and believe it or not, the removal and relocation of the Indians was the most just. The first solution was just too simply destroy all of the Indians.

Read More

Andrew Jackson And The Trail Of Tears

265 Words | 2 Pages

Nobody's lives would be the same after losing the ones they had lost during the long journey. The Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears were terrible events for the Native American people to live through. They lost lives, supplies, homes, and family memories.

Read More

Analysis Of Andrew Jackson's Speech

374 Words | 2 Pages

He achieved this by purposely neglecting the true horrors behind the removal of the Indians. Andrew Jackson portrayed the Native Americans as less than equal. The purpose of Jackson's speech was to justify his motives in moving the natives and to also convince congress that it was both beneficial to the Natives and the Americans. The source has value because it gives some insight into Jackson’s effort behind his motivation. Based on his purpose of speech, it can be learned that the relationship between the Natives and Americans was only beneficial for certain necessities.

Read More

The Impact Of Westward Expansion On Native Americans

847 Words | 4 Pages

Native Americans flourished in North America, but over time white settlers came and started invading their territory. Native Americans were constantly being thrown and pushed off their land. Sorrowfully this continued as the Americans looked for new opportunities and land in the West. When the whites came to the west, it changed the Native American’s lives forever. The Native Americans had to adapt to the whites, which was difficult for them.

Read More

Ghost Dance Argumentative Essay

928 Words | 4 Pages

Imagine everything about where you lived changed completely. Sadly on December 29,1890 this happened to the Native Americans. They were living their life calmly and normal until a tangle of events started to happen that led to the death of possibly three hundred Native Americans. The death were of innocent people and some that weren't even fighting back upsettingly these death also included women and children.

Read More

More about How Was Andrew Jackson Effective Of The Removal Of Native Americans?

Related Topics

Open Document