Social Cohesion Essay

795 Words4 Pages

(A) In Australia we have three main areas of human rights, individual human rights, democratic human rights and legal human rights. Individual human rights include, civil rights (freedom of speech and religion), economic rights (contract and property law) and social rights (privacy, education, family, environment). Democratic human rights protect political views but are reflected in the system of government in Australia and its laws. These include rights to vote, regular and democratic elections, and voting by secret value. Legal human rights are contained within common law principles of rule of law and natural justice. These rights reflect desire for a fair and just society and include concepts like citizens are presumed to be innocent until …show more content…

... Social cohesion contributes to a wide variety of social outcomes such as health and economic prosperity. With social Cohesion even if harmony isn’t reached, us as a society will have the believe that these four elements of law will achieve it once again. Social cohesion is achieved through four elements, Reinforcing values and rights in the community for example political, economic and religious rights, creating acceptable standards of conduct in society, limits of behaviour for example murder is unacceptable conduct. Establishing dispute settling institutions and processes , to enforce standards and resolve conflicts, providing law making and law reform for the changing law and changing values of …show more content…

These laws are democratically made by elected parliaments, using legislative powers specified in the commonwealth constitution. As a federation, it means statue law can be made by the national parliament, or 8 state or territory parliaments. Parliaments can also delegate law-making authority to local councils and government departments to change laws in there local area. Another way law can be changed is through judges. Judges have the right to make a new law when resolving a legal dispute, however it can only be reactive as a dispute must come before a court law can be made, courts are only reactive when changing the law and only able to act on the case presented to them. Executive made law, is when laws are made In the executive arm by bodies like councils and or government departments for example speed limit changes in tea tree gully are changed by the tea tree gully council.
(E) Australia’s two sources of law are Australian Parliaments and Australian courts existing at federal, state and territory levels. Statutes are made by democratically elected parliaments where their powers are specified in the constitution. Parliaments have the opportunity to delegate law making authority to subordinate bodies for minor issues for example speed limits. Parliaments are proactive to keep social cohesion. Un like common law which involves the courts being in the second source of Australian