Although, Ojito described her commitment to staying objective she failed towards her conclusion in Hunting Season by providing her own personal opinion and stating "what I think I do know is that Jeffrey Connor didn't set out to kill anybody that night" (Ojito, 2014, p. 223). However, Ojito provided sufficient information leads the reader to make his/her own personal interpretation including the note Jeff wrote at the end of the police report that stated, "killed by me" and the stab wound described as a "twist in the knife when it entered the body." Thus, ultimately, concluding that Jeff lacked "mens rea" when he committed the offense, appears to be bias and the final opinion should be left up to the reader.
Another area, not discussed in more detail included the statement Mayor Pontrieri used as a scapegoat throughout Hunting Season. He said, immigration was above his pay range because it’s a federal issue. Instead Pontrieri argues, he welcomes everyone into his town. However, by using this technique, he fails to acknowledge that ignoring the problem of hate towards immigrants in his community is failure to protect
…show more content…
Ojito (2014) discussed some of the effects of 9/11 on immigration law, studies pertinent to the Hunting Season such as a study conducted by Brown, looking at the influx of immigrants into suburbia and clearly defined concepts such as assimilation and acculturation. Additionally, Hunting Season provided a diversity of opinions, from the local undocumented individuals and citizens residing in Patchogue and local towns, government officials, community members, etc. Of importance, Ojito personally collected information by visiting Gualaceo, and examining the economy of the small town, the reasons why individuals migrate to the United States from the small town and paying her respects to the family of Marcelo