Ian Mcleod's View Of Naturalizing Indigenous Knowledge

According to Little Bear (2009) “Indigenous Knowledge (IK) is the reflection of the assemblage of skills and information vis-a-vise individuals, groups, cultures, communities, societies, and the various situations representing human kind all over the world” (Little, 2009). Indigenous knowledge therefore comprises of over 5000 cultures and languages spoken by a wide variety of people across the world (Little, 2009). In this context, McLeod presents an argument that defines the Aboriginal as cultures and peoples who have been living in a certain region indigenously. The Aboriginal people have therefore inhabited this land long before the arrival of the European settlers. Put into cognisance, this translates to the fact that they are the rightful owners of the land. Ideally, naturalizing indigenous knowledge in

An individual should have an idea of how culture relates to knowledge, learning and education. According to (Little, 2009), the naturalization if indigenous learning must benefit from a proper understanding of the relevant culture. This means that individuals must have a comprehensive understanding of the culture related to information, realizing, and instruction. Little defines culture as the collective operations of a society consisting of language, beliefs, morals, and their respond to nature of real life (Little, 2009). Consequently, indigenous knowledge can be naturalized by knowing cultures of different groups in the community. In his argument, Capon (2008) states that the end result of schooling among Aboriginals have been disregarded regardless of their uppermost significance. Little (2009), continues to regard learning as the method of acquiring knowledge or skills as a result of teaching bouts, training programs, considering what has been observed, or obtaining consciousness concerning a particular aspect or