ipl-logo

Identify Any Role Specific Obligations Involved With The Death Penalty Essay

669 Words3 Pages

1. Identify any role-specific obligations involved with the death penalty. • When it comes to the death penalty and identifying any role-specific obligations involved with the death penalty a few that come to mind are: the friends and family who care about the victim, loved ones of the persecuted, the executioner to the person(s) on trial as well as the inmates. 2. How might a utilitarian argue in favor of the death penalty? How might a utilitarian argue against the death penalty? In other words, think about the benefits and harms involved, and explain how we might weigh the benefits and harms against one another to produce the greatest sum total of happiness/good in society. • A utilitarian might react to the death penalty when in favor of it with “an eye for an eye” it is fair and just. The …show more content…

What concerns might we have about fairness and justice in thinking about the death penalty? • If two people committed same crime and one got the death penalty and the other didn’t, that means that the person died arbitrarily. This does unfortunately happen do to racial, gender, disability, prosecutorial discretion, and when poverty disparities are present. • Sadly, in my life I have seen and been a part of incidents where the wrong person was blamed. As I was heading to a Birthday dinner with a few friends, a woman, not a part of our group ran up and started hitting one of my male friends. I called 911 and when they arrived they didn’t even question the woman, instead they came straight to him asking what he did to her… this was a gender discrimination, I was scared and worried for my friend as he had done nothing wrong but the way the police conducted themselves towards him who horrible. 4. Is anyone’s autonomy at stake in this issue? Are any rights being violated, or liberties being limited? If we need to limit anyone’s autonomy, do we have sufficient justification for doing so? Here, ask yourself whether Kant’s principle of humanity applies to the death

Show More
Related
1318 Words | 6 Pages

I am not one to argue that capital punishment is without its flaws, nor am I one to argue that the death penalty is not inherently ugly in its entirety. I simply make the argument that the death penalty, or capital punishment, is a necessary evil. To accomplish this, I will begin by dissecting the arguments made by Stephen Nathanson in An Eye for an Eye. Nathanson states that for some crimes, it would not be considered morally acceptable to provide equal punishment to crimes committed. For example, I listed earlier that if we applied the equal punishment principle flatly across our justice system, it would require us to not only kill murderers, but also rape rapists, torture torturers, and kidnap kidnappers.

Read More
1218 Words | 5 Pages

In actuality, the death penalty is not ethical, as there are more practical ways in dealing with dangerous criminals; the sentencing of life without parole. Meanwhile, as the substantial topic on the death penalty persists, supporters for the death penalty that life without parole is unfair; if they denied a person a right to live, why should they get to live? While that may be true, the thought of

Read More
1646 Words | 7 Pages

Support for capital punishment requires valuing retribution over rehabilitation. Those who favor capital punishment value highly the closure it provides to the families of the victims, and they believe that it deters would be murderers from killing. Retribution, closure and deterrence are the main reasons in favor of the death penalty. Opponents of capital punishment generally believe that it is hypocritical and immoral for the state

Read More
720 Words | 3 Pages

Even though the death penalty can produce irreversible miscarriage of justice, death penalty should be allowed because it provides comfort to the victim's family, it deters crime, and you know the criminal will never hurt anyone again. Even though the death penalty can produce irreversible miscarriages of justice, Death penalty should be allowed because it provides comfort to the victim's family. Family and friends of the victims should never have to worry about parole or a slight chance of that same criminal escaping. Knowing that that one person

Read More
330 Words | 2 Pages

The arguments and disadvantages of the death penalty in the United States. The death penalty is one of the most explosive and emotionally charged debates with some of the most controversial issues regarding, who will be put to death and why? The death penalty has been continuously debated, not only with legal disputes, but as a religious and ethical reasoning. We must ask that question what would cause someone to act in a way that he or she would have a violent impulse which would make him or her commit a murder?

Read More
1147 Words | 5 Pages

Each ethical perspective would consider different aspects of the death penalty decision to determine if it would in fact be considered ethical. Utilitarian Ethics, Religious Ethics, Dual-Life Value, Objectivism, Formalism, and Virtue Ethics determine ethical decisions differently. In the case of

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

Should America continue to allow the death penalty? This essay will tell you why America should not be continue the death penalty. For starters, the death penalty is punishment by death; usually resulting after a crime that America calls capital crimes or capital offences. There are many of reasons why the death penalty should not be carried out in America or anywhere “Application of the death penalty tends to be arbitrary and capricious; for similar crimes, some are sentenced to death while others are not.”

Read More
645 Words | 3 Pages

Research Perspective: The Death penalty The death penalty in regards to our nation as well as our world is one of the biggest issues today because it plays god. The death penalty decides who can live and who dies. I got into this topic when I was reading about the Atkins v. Virginia case. Crimes and law has always fascinated me.

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

Of the eight possible topics in which I was presented to choose from, I have chosen to consider the topic that states: The death penalty is immoral, and no one who has been successfully taken into custody and imprisoned should ever then be executed. The reason I chose this topic is because I am neutral on the subject and have no bias towards either side. However, the fact that I am neutral on the subject will help me represent both sides equally and give a fair and honest argument from each angle. The reason I chose this topic over the other options would be because I have never really invested much time or thought into how ethical/unethical the death penalty actually is. This presents an opportunity for me to think critically about this topic, and therefore, form my own opinion on whether or not I agree/disagree with the statement provided.

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

For this is my second journal entry and we are talking about the death penalty which I think it’s very necessary to kill someone but at same time that person has a life even if his life is meaningless. Myself as American is established on the system we have here today, for the worst crimes and life without parole is better but yet for so many reasons people do bad things to good people. But then again I don’t how people operate now these days on how people can justify one person life to make a life changing decisions. For what, what’s right for our country, if that’s the case it doesn’t decrease crime, delays the suffering of families murder victims, costs a whole lot more than life in prison, and, worst of all, and risks executions of innocent people. Capital punishment is just the nice term to call death penalty is

Read More
816 Words | 4 Pages

The killing of anyone can not bring any good to anyone involved. In fact the Ten Commandments, the laws that are of the utmost importance for Christians, even states “You shall not murder.” A utilitarianist needs to sit down and consider the consequences of an action, and choose the one that produces the greatest amount of good. Having heard arguments to capital punishment my whole life pretty much, I could come up with two main arguments that a utilitarianist would have as to why capital punishment might be

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

Death Penalty and Constitutionality When looking at the death penalty there is a spectrum of ideas fueled by ideals and morals, many of which are correct in their own stance. While some may disagree with the claim that the death penalty is constitutional by a standard of an originalist or it is unconstitutional by a standard of a living constitutionalist, when looking at the the evidence as a originalist, the death penalty is constitutional. Although many people say that the death penalty is unconstitutional because of the VIII Amendment, the death penalty is constitutional, this is proven through evidence such as past cases setting precedents and the laws themselves that people want to change. The first idea to talk about is: What is the death penalty?

Read More
1542 Words | 7 Pages

Controversy of the Death Penalty The Death penalty is a controversial topic that has sparked a national debate. The death penalty is scrutinized for being morally and ethically wrong, but is justified since it can keep society safer. Capital Punishment, also known as Death Penalty, is a legal process where a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. Every state has a different opinion and viewpoint on the death penalty.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

The answer to this question is no, it is moral wrong, and does not follow the guidelines of the principle of utility. In all legal aspects of this process of the death penalty, it violates the principle consistently. From the realm of the cost aspect, the unfair representation of the prisoner, and the cruel and unusual execution methods, each creates clear and cohesive evidence that the death penalty cannot be ethically justified. If something does not inducing happiness and inflict pain to you, would you want it. No, this is the reasoning why we must cease using the death penalty, because it is not ethically

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Another pressing issue associated with the death penalty is the morals behind it. It teaches society that if someone has done something wrong you could just murder

Read More

More about Identify Any Role Specific Obligations Involved With The Death Penalty Essay

Related Topics

Open Document