Im Done With The Nfl By Dan Mclaughlin

Which one is more persuasive? In two article, they shows the readers about flag protest problem. One describes how the NFL football didn’t respect American and flag. Another one describes the famous person Colin Kaepernick who wants to explain his protest to people. but the people misunderstand it. n “I’m Done with the NFL “ by Dan Mclaughlin, Fox News, the author describes when he was little, and like football team very much. When he saw the NFL players disrespect the country and flag, he didn’t like the NFL football teams anymore because god and country are more important than the NFL football to him, and he suggests people do another thing instead of watching NFL football. In “We Can’t Hear Colin Kaepernick Anymore. He’s Being Drowned

And you clearly don’t understand the people who make you stars and make you rich (McLaughlin 1). Point out the NFL players disrespect our country, he protest against them. Meanwhile, McLaughlin explain they like football and make the NFL players to be the famous and rich people. Regardless not NFL players don’t know the country and god are the most important things in the author life. That’s why McLaughlin wants to protest NFL player, and he suggests the people try to do the same. McLaughlin adds appeals of emotion to convince the readers. He doesn’t reliefs on ethics or logic convince the readers, only

For example, Loggins quotes Kaepernick “This (protest) is not something that I am going to run by anybody, I am not looking for approval. I have to stand up for people that oppressed. If they take football away, my endorsements from me, I know that I stood up for what is right.” (Loggins 3). Demonstrates to the readers that Kaepernick thinks it is the right way to let the people understand his opinion, and why Kaepernick protest the country. The author adds another example is about his protest reason “I’m seeing things happen to people that don’t have a voice. People that don’t have a platform to talk and have their voices heard and effect change. I’m in a position where I can do that, and I’m going to do that for people that can’t” (Loggins 3). In this parts the author shows the readers Kaepernick’s loyalty, and he never cares about the money. He just wants people to know what he is doing now. This is the better article because Loggins shows more evidence and credible reasons or about logos how Kaeperick defend his beliefs. Loggins reflects that Kaeperick has ethics, and pathos because he donates lots money such as $50,000 to a program that provides meals to older impoverished Americans, or $50,000 to desperately needed health clinics to charities as