Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative

1118 Words5 Pages

Immanuel Kant was an significant leader in the development of modern philosophy, formulating unique inputs and contributions. Kant constantly pleaded that “the moral worth of an action is to be judged not by its consequences but by the nature of the maxim or principle that motivated the action” (Cahn and Markie, 314). When looking at Kant’s point of view and ideology, he was a leader in deontology believing the theory of the ‘right’. Kant believed that humans of this world should do the right thing for the right reason, instead of doing things for the following consequences or the rewards afterwards. When dissecting Kant’s studies, he believed in the supreme moral principle that is called the Categorical Imperative. This means that all leading actions are morally correct and acceptable if performed as a duty. The categorical …show more content…

1). The theory suggests that the action must be based solely on the reason and moral alone. The categorical imperative has many key points that are crucial for explaining who Kant would favor for giving to charity. By discussing the crucial formulations like the universal law, the humanity formula, and the Kingdom of ends, Kant would praise the person that is giving to charity because she truly enjoys doing so. My first argument regarding this subject would be that the proposed statement follows all concepts of the Universal law. As a recap, the proposed statement was that the person gives to charity because she truly