ipl-logo

Immanuel Kant's In Defense Of Same-Sex Marriage

715 Words3 Pages

A moral theory is a description of what makes an action and person right and acceptable or good (Vaughn). There are many different views ethicists can take when considering the subject. Same-sex marriage is defied as marriage in a full legal sense of gay and lesbian couples (Vaughn). There are many arguments as to whether marriage between the same gender is morally permissible or not. Many wonder if it should be allowed and if so, do the couples receive the benefits a traditional couple would receive? Some of these benefits include health and life insurance, property rights, tax breaks, and adoption. The argument over the topic of same-sex marriage has always been around, however in the past twenty years it has become more intense and common. In 1996, the United States Congress voted to pass the Defense of Marriage Act. This act prohibited the federal government to acknowledge same-sex marriages. However, it did not take away the power of the states to …show more content…

The categorical imperative is a command we should follow despite our own particular wants and needs. It is inferred that Immanuel Kant would have disagreed with the idea of same-sex marriage. According to Kant, it is everyone’s duty to not be involved in any action that if everyone would do it, would lead to the fall of mankind ("Kantian Stance on Same-Sex Relations"). One of the most obvious reasons for the end of mankind would be due to a stop of reproduction. Same-sex marriage would not result in childbearing, therefore it is wrong. However, Kant’s theory may also support same-sex marriage (Vaughn). Kant’s theory also includes the respect for persons. It states that we must treat people not a means to an end and that the people’s rights be given the supreme priority. By denying gays and lesbians the right to marry, it takes away their rights. They are deprived of the equality and the opportunities they

Show More
Related

David Boonin's Response To Jeff Jordan

1192 Words | 5 Pages

David Boonin’s response to Jeff Jordan made great points. Boonin mentions that “marriage involves a public recognition of a personal relationship between two people and people who are married become eligible for various sorts of public benefits that are unavailable to unmarried couples” and that to take this away from homosexual couples makes it into a “public dilemma” (Boonin 247). I strongly agree with this claim, as it is basic to understand that regardless of your gender, race, or sexual orientation, you are entitled as a human to certain rights. It is a discrimination to try and retract this right from anyone because of their sexual orientation. Just as it would be to try and prevent marriages of different races or religious backgrounds.

Read More

Obergefell V. Hodges: Case Study

1057 Words | 5 Pages

The Supreme Court kept referring back to the Loving v. Virginia case because both cases had the same principles which were equality and not having the right to marriage. According to the Supreme Court “These new insights have strengthened, not weakened, the institution of marriage.” Also “Under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” These liberties include certain personal choices which include intimate choices. Marriage is coming together for better or for worse and same sex couples should have the same right as

Read More

Katha Pollitt What's Wrong With Gay Marriage Analysis

936 Words | 4 Pages

The essay written by Katha Pollitt, titled, “What’s wrong with gay marriage” is an intriguing one. At first, the author, explains the notion that marriage and procreation do not necessarily go hand-in- hand. And later, she carefully interprets the true meaning of marriage; by stating there is a separation of church and state. Most importantly, the author speaks to her audience in a clear and logical manner; without adding personal biases. Although the essay may seem to have deterministic view on social behavior.

Read More

Yonat Shimron What Does The Bible Actually Say About Gay Marriage

1768 Words | 8 Pages

Same-sex marriages can help add more money to the wedding industry, it can help decrease cost of state benefits, it can add more revenue to the whole state, denying them the right to marry goes against the fourteenth amendment, it would be the right source of action since they face discrimination, denying someone the right to marry means that you are denying them happiness, religious leaders support it because it bring peace in the communities, they support it because they see everyone as God’s children and they support it because, in the bible, the term marriage meant just between two women and the term didn’t regard to gender. Same-sex marriages can very important essence to help boost the economy because it can help during times when a state is going through a crisis like they don’t have a lot of employment. Don’t have funds to improve communities or it can help the entire country fund into healthcare, education and---- which can improve some nay lives. Allowing a ban on same-sex marriage is a bad example towards the next generations of children. It’s teaching them that it’s ok to discriminate certain people.

Read More

American Civil Liberties Union Pros And Cons

505 Words | 3 Pages

Those who are support same-sex marriage often argue that love is grounds enough for marriage, Regardless of sexual orientation(2 https://www.aclu.org/).Those who are against same sex marriage often tell their religious aspect, and viewpoints and concerns about the raising of children as the main reason for their opposition. The debate of same-sex marriage involves many legislative,cultural,religious,and family issues(3). Christian groups that argue for same-sex marriage believe that lesbian,and gay people were created by god and should have the same rights as heterosexual couples. Christian groups that argue against homosexuality often say that it is immoral, against gods will,and against human sexual goals which is to have kids. The Islamic faith openly rejects homosexuality telling the story of lot in Sodom as a condemnation of

Read More

Comparison Of Marriage And Andrew Sullivan's Against Gay Marriage

963 Words | 4 Pages

In Andrew Sullivan’s “For Gay Marriage” and William J. Bennett’s “Against Gay Marriage”, the two authors speak about the topic of marriage and what validates one. Sullivan is a former editor of the New Republic Magazine and is well versed in the topic of gay marriage. Bennett was a chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities and has multiple writings over cultural issues. While both Sullivan and Bennett write about marriage and what constitutes a valid marriage, Sullivan appears to favor the idea that any two people can be married, while Bennett says that gay marriage will ruin the institution of marriage. Both authors discuss the concept of marriage and who should be allowed to enter into a marriage.

Read More

Should Soldiers Be Allowed To Work

759 Words | 4 Pages

Nothing should dictate what a human being’s heart desires. If a citizen in the United States enjoys the freedoms the United States ensures, then they should be able to pick their desires in marriage without boundaries. If a person wishes to abide by what is considered orthodox in their culture, be it heterosexual marriage or polygamy, then that is purely their choice and should not be influenced by others. Moreover for homosexual marriage. And individual’s choice to marry a person of the same sex is their own, and it should not be bound by guidelines others consider to be

Read More

Constitution Amendment

751 Words | 4 Pages

Considering the political issues today same-sex marriage controversy serves to be significant as it has not been able to reach its height at the national level. As only 36 states out of 50 legally approve of same-sex marriage (Fausset and Blinder, The NewYork Times.com). Amending the Constitution for same-sex marriage serves to be a huge controversy and a difficult process due to many opinions present within the political and social circuit. Another reason many citizens do not support the idea of same-sex marriage is due to traditional social beliefs and morals. For example, many Americans oppose the idea of same-sex marriage on religious grounds.

Read More

Personal Narrative: My First Twelve Step Meetings

1157 Words | 5 Pages

I attended my first twelve step meeting on March 5th. I decided to go to this one because it was an open meeting, in a good location, and on a Sunday. I figured the crowd would be bigger on a Sunday because people wouldn’t be busy with work. The meeting was located at 511 Melrose Avenue, right across the street from Slater Hall. I left my sorority house around 9:00 a.m.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Conversion Therapy

1770 Words | 8 Pages

Many advocates for the ban of gay marriage cited religious texts and gods as their source saying man cannot define the meaning of marriage, only a god could. As religion is often used as a battering ram against the equality of marriage it has been claimed that homosexuality is unnatural and marriage for these couples would lead to moral decay and a “slippery slope” to things such as pedofilia and beastiality being legalized. The argument of that marriage exists for the subsequent children of the couple is also used, the basis being that a gay or lesbian couple could not have children “naturally”. Tied into this is the argument of children needing a mother and father to develop properly and not be at risk for unhealthy behaviors such as early sexual activity, drug or alcohol abuse, and the

Read More

Ethical Arguments Against Homosexuality

1149 Words | 5 Pages

This Statement of Principles also writes, “Jews who have an exclusively homosexual orientation should, under most circumstances, not be encouraged to marry someone of the other gender, as this can lead to great tragedy, unrequited love, shame, dishonesty and ruined lives” (Groves). Homosexuals are taught to stay celibate and unmarried because the Orthodox Jews define marriage as a sacred union strictly between a man and

Read More

Sociological Perspective On Gay Marriage

178 Words | 1 Pages

Gay marriage is one of the biggest controversies that has been going on for more than a decade in the United States. It is an issue that society can’t agree on and is always in a debate about because gay marriage is a violation of social norms. As humans, we don’t adapt well to change and since this would be changing a social norm, many people don’t agree with it. Through sociological perspective, it is known that we are influenced, society guides us, and social forces affect us and that’s what’s happening with this issue. It’s hard for many of us to see the functionalist perspective of gay marriage due to the impact that it has on society.

Read More

A Christian's Arguement For Homosexual Rights

852 Words | 4 Pages

The last point of view is full acceptance. This stance asserts that all homosexuals deserve the same rights as heterosexuals. They are entitled to same-sex marriage and cannot be punished for their acts. The idea behind this belief is that homosexuality should not be considered a sin because all lives were created by God, therefore, he created them for who they are. A person should not be criminalized due to their way of living life.

Read More

Gay Marriage Persuasive Research Paper Outline

1612 Words | 7 Pages

My second reason for supporting LGBT/ same-sex marriage is the reason for discrimination against marriage. The UDHR article number 7 illustrates that all people are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination. Furthermore, article 1 of the UDHR also indicates that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. We should act towards one another in a spirit of a brother. By denying the same right as anybody else just because you are different is a clear form of discrimination, and it goes against the constitution.

Read More

Thesis Statement For Gay Marriage Essay

934 Words | 4 Pages

Marriage brings legal rights that secure a couple that if not wedded, they should not have. Then again, some contend that gay person marriage may make issue bring up a youngster and upset the normal, natural reproduction of humanity (Burns, 2005). Thesis Statement Supporting gay marriage will bring peace and equality in the society and will promote better relationships and parenting. Changing Views on Traditional Marriage

Read More

More about Immanuel Kant's In Defense Of Same-Sex Marriage

Related Topics

Open Document