Impact Of Rose On Shelley Vs Kraemer

414 Words2 Pages

Shelley v. Kraemer played a pivotal role in abolishing RRCs and opening urban housing to minorities. However, Shelley did very little to influence the patterns of segregation present in most neighborhoods. The idea that racial segregation or racial mixing did not change for people and influence the housing market for long after Shelley (Property Stories: Rose on Shelley v. Kraemer, pp. 218-219). “Legality helped to cement the idea that maintaining property values depended on segregated housing, and that was an idea that did not go away with Shelley.” (Quoted in Rose 56ArizLRevSyl11, pp. 15)
Federal Housing Administration (FHA) FHA that made RRCs an important condition of mortgage insurance continued to enact their policies to segregate white families to new and exclusive suburbs. Even after the courts prohibited explicit racial zoning, FHA believed that African American families threaten home value and their insurability. “the FHA took the position that the presence of African Americans in nearby neighborhoods was nonetheless a consideration that could threaten FHA insurability” (quoted in Making Ferguson, pp. 16). The effects of their actions of racial segregation persists even today in most neighborhoods. (Making Ferguson, pp. 15-17)

Distribution of African-American Population (and the social effects) …show more content…

Louis is still being influenced by racial segregation due to its history and social norms present in the city. The segregated distribution of African-American or minority population influence the political power, cultural, health, wealth, education, and employment (Race in St. Louis. St Louis Magazine, pp. 1-2). Ferguson also face the same pressure of facing certain social and cultural norms associated with racial segregation because it still exists in these cities. Moreover, racial segregation and the impact of RRCs still continue to affect the educational opportunities of today’s Mexican-American community in San Antonio (Educational Legacy, pp.